Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It all comes down to Virginia, Missouri, and Tennessee for Senate, predictions?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 05:55 PM
Original message
It all comes down to Virginia, Missouri, and Tennessee for Senate, predictions?
We need 7 seats.

We are going to win Montana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Rhode Island.

It will all come down to Missouri, Virginia, and Tennessee.

What do you think will happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Webb has a chance in Virginia. But those three are hard states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. most polls, including GOP internals have Webb leading
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. MT,PA,OH,MD,RI,VA
I see us winning six.

I think MO and TN will go the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm in Md and I don't like the looks around here Cardin ignored the
black community too much. When will the dems learn you win elections by enegerizing and keeping you base, not by trying to be repug lite. The repugs always play to their base and they always come out to vote. I wish the dems would learn that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Elections are won in the center, not with base politics.
Base political theory only works in select circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. GOP has been using base politics for over a decade
Won for them virtually every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. They won in 1994 and 2002 with heavy support in the center.
Independents voted 56% for Republicans in 1994. That's not base politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Huge Misinterpretation, IMHO
Republicans play base politics instead of playing to the center. Turns out, centrist voters prefer that, as evidenced by the numbers you cite.

Its about standing for something that you really believe in and sticking with it, and trying to convince voters you're right. As opposed to picking which positions poll better (in April) and hoping the voters maintain those views on election day. That doesn't seem to be working very well for us.

Winning the center doesn't mean you played to the center at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. My point is that when you've pissed off the center like the Dems in 1994
or the Republicans in 1964, it doesn't matter how solid your base is. If Republicans came out declaring this a Christian Republic and ran on a campaign of outlawing sodomy and birth control pills like their base really wants, they would get 30% of the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. I agree, Maryland is our wildcard if we don't get the traditional
African-American vote to turn out for Cardin in sufficient numbers, Steele could win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. that won't be enough
We need to hold MD and NJ, win the 4 seats I mentioned, and win 2 of Virginia, Missouri, Tennessee.

I think our best chances are in Virginia and Missouri. Tennessee is looking very bad. Lots and lots of racists in Tennessee will do what they can not to elect a black man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Well, we'll still have some joementum, cough.
So 5 + Joe gives us control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am afraid we will get 5
:scared:

It fits with the "oh..so close..better luck next time" scenario that the media loves so much..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cadmium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would be a jinx so I will defer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dems win VA; Repubs win TN
MO...no firm prediction. I *think* it's trending Dem...but...MO sucks. No offense to Missourians. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Media better do their jobs in those states, as a way to make up for
Florida and Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. If we don't get one of them
We need to go back to the drawing board. I don't understand how this election is that close to begin with, or how every election is that close. It's not logical to me that the entire country is split right down the middle. I just don't believe it's possible that 50% of this country are willing to give Bush a rubberstamp when 70% say we're off track and need to make a change in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. it isn't split down the middle
the seats are gerrymandered big time in the house. What they do is put all the black people in their own districts as a way of electing minorities. The problem with that is when you make these 90% minority districts that are 90% democrat you have much less democrats in the other districts. So you get a few 90% democrat districts so the democrats are assured a token amount of represenation and all the other districts are carved to be 55-60% republican.

the senate also isn't "democratic" in representing the people. The small rural states get more represenation in the senate than their population should warrant and they lean republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. you said the magic word "gerrymander". And when we win governerships this week
it'll help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Many rural states are split too
AZ, MT, TN, VA. There's a Congressional race in WY that's 50/50. All these races are closer than what the facts of what people believe about the country would indicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Also, the red states represent far fewer
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 07:07 PM by Jim4Wes
constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Because the media is "driving the bus"
they HAVE to make it "exciting" or they don;t get ratings.

Would people tune in to see that the races were runaways? nope..

Everything in the US simply MUST be exciting and "oooh so close"..

When the poll all showed double digit differences, lots of us predicted that this would happen.

It "covers' for "fixing", and it helps people accept losses that should never have occured..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Two billion dollars of campaign ads
Don't you suppose that has something to do with these horse races?? I think a huge investigation is in order, into these polling companies and ad companies. This just isn't right and it's outside the point of any election fixing I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Of course it does... Who would run all those ads if they were
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 07:13 PM by SoCalDem
ahead by 15 points?

That's why we simply HAVE to have public financing and FREE airtime for candidates.

there;s NO reason on earth why we cannot have a speacial channel totally devoted to political campaigns.. a channel where ALL candidates have equal time to actually explain their stances on all issues... where there are weekly town hall meetings.. REAL ones with free admission..no "packing" the audience with plants.

It would eliminate to need for all the payola cash..

that;s why it will never happen :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Not to be stupid here
But isn't that part of what CSpan is supposed to do? There's 3 channels there. I hear what you're saying, but what would be the difference?

I think we should ban all political tv advertising along with public financing, strict caps on spending, and limited campaign seasons. I'm sick of this garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Nope.. C-span has a contractual obligation to "cover"
gavel to gavel

cspan1 house
cspan2 senate

because they rarely ever WORK anymore, cspan has time to show other stuff, but when they house and senate are in session, they HAVE to cover them

Most cable companies don't even offer cspan3

a political channel on REGULAR tv is what's needed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Regular tv?
Okay, so how would that work? These are curiosity questions, not argmentative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. CBS,NBC,ABC all have licenses. The govt could just
announce that there's a new license being created.. and a new channel..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Kind of like PBS
only restricted to state politics. Is that what you mean? I suppose that could work. I imagine with the internet though, there will be interactive townhalls and what not before too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. exactly what I mean
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grebrook Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. We win Missouri, undecideds will turn against Talent, and we win Virginia, we lose Tennessee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
46. Agree.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'd say two out of three.
I think that VA is a win, and we'll win either MO or TN. Toss-up which, but I would lean on TN being the one we win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlamoDemoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. My thinking is that we will win VA, and MO, and loose TN
But of course, I am not pollster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. MO outright win; TN a loss; VA fought in the courts. eom
...O...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. not necessarily, I think Maryland and/or NJ for Dems could also
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 06:25 PM by WI_DEM
be close, and if we lose one or both of them then the Senate is a goner. I think I'm most worried about Maryland right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why are people so confident of MT, I'm scared, that race has tightened
though I did my part in nagging my daughter nearly to death, til she voted on Friday. She said, "Thanks for nagging me, I wanted to vote, but kept thinking I was too busy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. There is 6% undecided in the last poll
They should break for the change candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Early returns
58% Dem returns to 37% Rep returns. Tester has been ahead in almost every poll and still is, he broke 51% the other day. Stealing an election there would be pretty difficult because it's too small for peculiar machine vote shifting, there aren't precincts that strongly lean one way or the other which would defeat the purpose of machine shorting, they know each other when people show up to vote, etc. That one looks really really good to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
34. I think we end up one short
I hope we dont but I have a feeling we end up one short .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
35. I would give my left nut
to see Allen,in particular, GO DOWN. Then I would spit on him. That man is evil.

Y'all know that it happened again to Mike Stark at another Allen rally? If not, he has a diary at kos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. Going out on a very tenuous limb..
Montana - win
Pennsylvania - win
Ohio - win
Rhode Island - win
Missouri - win
Virginia - win
Tennessee - lose

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
38. win VA, lose TN, MO could go either way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
39. Don't count out AZ as yet
Pederson has been behind in the polls but has been making some steady gains recently.

Hopefully the Big Dawg's appearances this week have helped his campaign even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bermudat Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. I had a job interview in Tennessee.
No f*cking way would that state send any black person to the Senate, even one as conservative as Harold Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
42. L,L,L
but I do hope we win one (perhaps VI?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
45. Ford will lose, all others win
IMHO, independents are going to break our way - much more so than the pundits think. But Harold Ford is cooked. He may only lose by a hair. But I don't think there's any way, barring some kind of bombshell, that he can pull this one out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. USA Today said that Ford was ahead by 5 points.
But, I don't know if their polls are very accurate or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
48. Treason, illegal invasion, "military commissions", Medicare mess,
pledge to privatize SS, deficit----WHAT MORE DO PEOPLE NEED to vote DEMOCRATIC??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC