Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you are curious why Iraq is in the crapper and why America is next down the shoot...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
angry_chuck Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:06 PM
Original message
If you are curious why Iraq is in the crapper and why America is next down the shoot...
As eloquently stated by 'scholarly Jew' Al Franken in The Truth...

"...it's because every one of eminently reasonable recommendations fell not on deaf ears, but on ears into which fingers had been deliberately inserted."

Franken believes the postwar planning was ignored because they do not believe in objective reality (not hard to believe) and because they 'had' Chalabi..."who hadn't been in Baghdad since 1956."

" assured the Bushies that the postwar would be the easy part."

"We would be greeted with sweets and flowers...Chalabi would take over---and, presto chango, Iraq would be a U.S.-friendly Jeffersonian style democracy, an Australia with oil."

Chalabi is a money hungry fraud who is abhorred by his own people because they know his true intentions, i.e. the preservation and advancement of Ahmed Chalabi and his family, not you or yours. Is it any wonder the Iraqi's would be skeptical of such a man?

What I often find myself wondering is how can we fail to correlate the parallels between Chalabi, his intense self-interest and desire to promote the lives and advancement of his own inner-circle, and that of good ol' Bonesman George W. The oath George took on January 20th, 2005 was initiated 5 minutes before noon, on Skull and Bones time. Does that mean that his oath in 1968 to this secretive fraternal order supercedes his oath to us, the American people? Surely Bush apologists will cry afoul; labeling such occurrences as simple coincidence or conspiracy theory. That is the beauty about a secret society; it's existence and intentions are incredibly hard to prove through objective facts. The empirical record is substantially more difficult to disprove when faced with the unequivocal fact that numbers do not lie. Their analysis is spun to achieve different ends but the facts stand the blistering assault to ultimately reveal the truth.

Bush hates Iraq, he hates you, he hates workers, he hates the constitution, he hates Christians, God and Jesus, he hates freedom and liberty of all kinds.

Bush loves money, for him and his ken, and their friends , he loves to lie, to spin, to say one thing and act in a manner which not only contradicts his rhetoric but is a direct slap in the face to those who expound the true meaning of patriotism and of liberty....

"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls topped by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders.…The Goliath of totalitarianism will be brought down by theAs eloquently stated by 'scholarly Jew' Al Franken in The Truth...

"...it's because every one of eminently reasonable recommendations fell not on deaf ears, but on ears into which fingers had been deliberately inserted."

Franken believes the postwar planning was ignored because they do not believe in objective reality (not hard to believe) and because they 'had' Chalabi..."who hadn't been in Baghdad since 1956."

" assured the Bushies that the postwar would be the easy part."

"We would be greeted with sweets and flowers...Chalabi would take over---and, presto chango, Iraq would be a U.S.-friendly Jeffersonian style democracy, an Australia with oil."

Chalabi is a money hungry fraud who is abhorred by his own people because they know his true intentions, i.e. the preservation and advancement of Ahmed Chalabi and his family, not you or yours. Is it any wonder the Iraqi's would be skeptical of such a man? Why are we not more skeptical of those who would so readily lead us down such a hazardous path?

What I often find myself wondering is how can we fail to correlate the parallels between Chalabi, his intense self-interest and desire to promote the lives and advancement of his own inner-circle, and that of good ol' Bonesman George W. The oath George took on January 20th, 2005 was initiated 5 minutes before noon, on Skull and Bones time. Does that mean that his oath in 1968 to this secretive fraternal order supercedes his oath to us, the American people? Surely Bush apologists will cry afoul; labeling such occurrences as simple coincidence or conspiracy theory. That is the beauty about a secret society; it's existence and intentions are incredibly hard to prove through objective facts. The empirical record is substantially more difficult to disprove when faced with the unequivocal fact that numbers do not lie. Their analysis is spun to achieve different ends but the facts stand the blistering assault to ultimately reveal the truth.

Bush hates Iraq, he hates you, he hates workers, he hates the constitution, he hates Christians, God and Jesus, he hates freedom and liberty of all kinds.

Bush loves money, for him and his ken, and their friends , he loves to lie, to spin, to say one thing and act in a manner which not only contradicts his rhetoric but is a direct slap in the face to those who expound the true meaning of patriotism and of liberty....

"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls topped by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders.…The Goliath of totalitarianism will be brought down by the David of the microchip." ~ Ronald Reagan

"It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own." ~ Thomas Jefferson

"It is incorrect to think of liberty as synonymous with unrestrained action. Liberty does not and cannot include any action, regardless of sponsorship, which lessens the liberty of a single human being. To argue contrarily is to claim that liberty can be composed of liberty negations, patently absurd. Unrestraint carried to the point of impairing the liberty of others is the exercise of license, not liberty. To minimize the exercise of license is to maximize the area of liberty. Ideally, government would restrain license, not indulge in it; make it difficult, not easy; disgraceful, not popular. A government that does otherwise is licentious, not liberal." ~ Leonard E. Read

This is conquest of a new breed, accomplished through moral deception and intellectual subversion on a grand scale, seeking to destroy liberty and replace it with a humanist unitarianism. However the good shall only be maximized for the people who matter, the 'men of privilege'. But no worries, they are in charge because they care about you, and they know best. Trust them, unquestioningly, lest you renounce your patriotism and concede to your being 'Un-American'.

"All the world wondered after the beast . . . and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him?" (Revelation 13:3,4) David of the microchip." ~ Ronald Reagan

"It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own." ~ Thomas Jefferson

"It is incorrect to think of liberty as synonymous with unrestrained action. Liberty does not and cannot include any action, regardless of sponsorship, which lessens the liberty of a single human being. To argue contrarily is to claim that liberty can be composed of liberty negations, patently absurd. Unrestraint carried to the point of impairing the liberty of others is the exercise of license, not liberty. To minimize the exercise of license is to maximize the area of liberty. Ideally, government would restrain license, not indulge in it; make it difficult, not easy; disgraceful, not popular. A government that does otherwise is licentious, not liberal." ~ The Freeman by Leonard E. Read

This is conquest of a new breed, accomplished through moral deception and intellectual subversion on a grand scale, seeking to destroy liberty and replace it with a humanist unitarianism. However the good shall only be maximized for the people who matter, the 'men of privilege'. But no worries, they are in charge because they care about you, and they know best. Trust them, unquestioningly, lest you renounce your patriotism and concede to your being 'Un-American'.

"All the world wondered after the beast . . . and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him?" (Revelation 13:3,4)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um, it's "down the chute," not "down the shoot."
Just so you know.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angry_chuck Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. sorry
the point is clear. I thought 'chute' was nicer than some of the alternative phrases. Thanks for the lesson...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's a good post, though.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC