Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was it right or wrong for Mike Jones to out Rev. Haggard?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:50 AM
Original message
Was it right or wrong for Mike Jones to out Rev. Haggard?
Just curious to know what most folks feel about the powerful hypocrite being outed. Is it a good or a bad thing? Should more people out more hypocrites?

Wither Mike Jones?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. 100% correct
Expose all hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Ditto
Push these lying bastards out into the streets so that the whole country can see them for what they are. And it's not because they're gay, it's because they're lying bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm fine with exposing HYPOCRISY. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. His sexuality is unimportant - It's the hypocrisy that bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. If he was doing a FEMALE hooker who was his meth dealer...same diff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. You are todays winner
That is exactly the point we shoulg be making anyone and everyone.
If he was having an extra-marital affair with a woman we would have reported it, because he's a f**king hate filled hypocrite who preaches that extra-marital affairs, sex out of wedlock and homosexuality are wrong.
In addition he tries to get laws passed that would discriminate against about 10% of the population,

He's a hypocrite that's the issue.

for your hitting the bullseye I give you the following:

:D

:party:

:toast:

:beer:

:yourock:

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anniebelle Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Same here.
I have friends that are gay that have been shot at, had their house burned down and all by "christians" in our little community. I'm so sick of these lying scumbags that dress up on Sunday and play like they're so good. Fuck 'em. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Right especially with Haggard pushing Colo One Man One Woman Amend. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm against outing people
I understand the hypocrisy angle. But outing just doesn't feel right to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Normally I would agree with you,
but anyone who engages in gay sex privately, but publicly denounces homosexuality and promotes legislation against same-sex unions is fair game in my book.

I'm pretty sure my brother-in-law is gay, but he chooses to live quietly in the closet and I respect that. If, however, he was involved in anti-gay activities I would have no problem speaking out. I feel the same way about public figures like Ted Haggard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. It is the Frank Rule.
Anyone who uses their power and prestige to further a hateful agenda against the rights of homosexuals loses the protection of the community that they are publicly attacking and deserves to be revealed for what they are. It is really very simple. There is no real ethical dilemma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. You act like there is something wrong with being gay
Telling the public that someone is gay is not a slam or insult, except to hypocritical bigots.

There is nothing wrong with being gay, so an 'outing' is just pointing out that due to a discoverable fact about someone, they are acting like a hypocritical asshole.

I understand you are being considerate in your opinion, but you have to keep in mind that this person was DIRECTLY responsible for creating and pushing a gay marriage ban in Colorado, so destroying his credibility with truth to protect innocent gay peoples' rights is not only OK, I feel it is OBLIGATORY in this situation, and to not do so would be a moral failing.

Same thing as pointing out it is hypocracy for a black man to oppose civil rights legislation or an anti-feminist woman opposing the ERA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. It is a violation of privacy
No, there is nothing wrong with being gay. But, imo, even hypocrites have a right to privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. So is a gay marriage ban
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Haggard's family may be destroyed.
But he had absolutely no problem destroying other people's families.

He's a self-righteous hypocrite who supported a fascist administration. Out him and ruin him. Why should he be allowed to continue on his blithe path of horror?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. His Family Will Heal AFAIC They Will Be Better W/O Him
Ted on the other hand is being cast aside as a pariah and rightly so. God is shining the light on this DEMON (and I do not choose that word lightly) and he deserves all the scorn, hate, anger, turpitude, wrath, malice, and shit sandwich's thrown at him. How many people have killed themselves over his deceit and HATE during the past 21 years of his "ministry"? How many people have lived in despair and depression because of the things this man said to them in a fucking church for Gods sake.

While Teddy had his hot sex, and meth, and whatever other illicit tawdry things he engaged in; he was bludgeoning people with his words of damnation and condemnation, he was actively working to enact legislation to keep two people in love from getting legal martial status, he was agitating and fomenting HATE and DIVISIVENESS, he was reducing an entire community of people as NON HUMAN TRASH. He is a DEMON.

Bring it on for the Tedster. He deserves to be hung by his teeth as far as I'm concerned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ecumenist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. ABSOLUTELY!!!
hypocrite doesn't even begin to describe the good pastor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. Justice is a dish best served cold but when it comes to Republicans
good grief...the Girls Gone Wild guy could start a new line with these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bear down under Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. Mr Jones put it in a nutshell
"It made me angry that here's someone preaching about gay marriage and going behind the scenes having gay sex."

Yes, Haggard would have been just as guilty of hypocrisy had he been, er, seeing a female hooker; but this goes beyond simple hypocrisy, beyond "do as I say, not as I do". He hasn't been pushing for constitutional amendments to ban heterosexual prostitution or adultery -- he's been pushing for anti-gay ones. It's "I want the law of the land to compel you to do as I say, but of course as a man of God I am above mere secular law and may do as I please."

Mr Jones was right to follow his own conscience in the matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Jesus exposed hypocrites too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. It was correct. When hypocrites like Haggard and his ilk are in
positions to do massive harm, their right to privacy does not exist in my opinion. Like in any war, you have to fight fire with fire, and these people have declared war on homosexuals. They deserve whatever they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'm sure that he couldn't live with the secret anymore.
He probably didn't like living a lie. Or, he wanted to get a book deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
22. Based on the interviews of Jones
I think he acted in a way that was necessitated by his feelings. I suppose most people in a similar situation would feel the same way. And I think it is necessary that the holy rollers changing the laws for the wrong reasons be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. I think Mike Jones was steered by God to out him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USA_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
24. Haggard!
"I didn't have sex with that male prostitute, Mr Jones"

"I used meth but didn't inhale"


there's an old story about the fact that God punishes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
25. Because Haggard sought to inflict his professed "values" upon the rest of us...
that makes him 100% fair game.

The minute he talks to a politician and says, "Change these SECULAR laws," he is no longer a minister-- he is a politician. And that makes him fair game. Politics is a full-contact sport.

So, I have to vote 100% for "fuck him."

Now, there is another case that appears to be very sad.

This Presbyterian minister took his own life when his secret misdeeds were about to be exposed. But I can find no evidence that he was politically active in changing the rules that people outside his flock live by. Therefore, I would say this guy should have been left alone by the media:

See:
{Pittsburgh, PA} Pastor takes his life in wake of TV probe
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=175x11773
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
27. As I understand, amongst teen suicides, gay teens make up 30% of that total. How
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 09:10 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
many deaths does this man have on his hands due to his hypocrisy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC