|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:42 AM Original message |
WTFH ?- Chafee up 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Looks like an outlier to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 10:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Not just this race... skewed for others as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. Must be a bad poll, look at all the others before and after... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Yes, how can it be so far off - it's not like Whitehouse got caught |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
3. and Burns even in MT. The senate 'takeover" is looking bad today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Who said Burns even, just curious. Does it mean they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hav (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laura PourMeADrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:48 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Amen. One good thing is that we have Sweitzer up there to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
8. Throw Out The Top & Bottom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
9. Kyl is only up 4 in AZ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkhawk32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
10. They need plausible deniability for a theft. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
11. What was the sampling on that poll? Like new ABC/WaPo poll oversampling CONs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Mason-Dixon is using 2004 turnout numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 10:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. And Ohio had a same-sex ballot in '04 which helped the rwingnuts GOTV |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
12. Those NBC polls looked very weird |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 10:02 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Way too skewed... Ford is not down by 12... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 10:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. JC: Complete agreement with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. I can believe PA and VA. Ohio is way out of line with every other poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sshan2525 (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-05-06 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
19. Not to worry.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC