Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you trust that your absentee ballot will actually be counted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:17 PM
Original message
Do you trust that your absentee ballot will actually be counted?
Edited on Tue Nov-07-06 01:24 PM by in_cog_ni_to
If you voted absentee ballot, that is.

Our County Clerk is a repuke, Bruce Clark. That's why I chose NOT to vote by absentee ballot. This is the same man who chose to store our county's evoting machines in a Olivet University (Education with a Religious Purpose) warehouse. Olivet University received a $300,000 grant for their science dept. BEFORE the '04 election. Who gave them the grant? Repuke Jerry Weller. Bruce Clark also had Olivet University students working at the polling places in '04 to "help" in case there were any "glitches."

Hell would have to freeze over before I sent in a absentee ballot for HIS OFFICE to count. NO WAY. I took my chances with the optical scan machine.

Do you think YOUR absentee ballot will be counted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, which is why I refuse to vote absentee
If I can't hand my ballot off to someone in the direct chain of accountability, I don't see any point in filling the ballot out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Our whole county (Snohomish) is mail in now.
Edited on Tue Nov-07-06 01:23 PM by ClayZ
I do not think we had a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You should able to drop the ballot off at an official drop
Otherwise, the county is in extreme trouble for requiring what amounts to a poll tax (the 67 cent stamp.) Also, the drop should be in a secure, supervised location. Otherwise, what is to prevent voter fraud?

It seems unconcientable to trust our fundamental civic duty to who knows how many anonymous postal workers, all of whom are employed by a company that is totally controlled by people with a vested interest in the outcome of the election. I am very angry at the mandatory move to mail-in voting; it strikes me as extremely irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. No.
Edited on Tue Nov-07-06 01:29 PM by MindPilot
Since our SoS says paper ballots--which I assume includes absentees--won't be counted until Thursday.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3740

I've been voting absentee since way before the whole e-voting farce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eliphaslevi Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is doubtful
Edited on Tue Nov-07-06 01:23 PM by eliphaslevi
There really wasn't a choice. It was either the e-vote machine or an absentee paper ballot (early voting). -Florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
station agent Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sure mine won't be counted--but...
As Michael Moore says--you can't catch them cheating unless you vote. In my case vote absentee, which I have no choice on anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent Smith Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe not
I remember reading that absentee ballots that are received on the day of the election (or close to it) are only counted if they can change the election outcome. I don't know if this is everywhere or just is some places. They have to hand check every signature on them so it is time consuming. They can't just feed them through their counting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. We have a website where we can check
if our ballot was received. That's it. Who knows if it was counted. We would have to assume that the majority of the counters, were honest.

I wish I could believe that. I am no longer so naive.

....sigh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nope. Which is why I show up and hope the opti-scan
is working correctly. At least there's my paper ballot for an audit...like that's going to happen, but still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes. I trust our ballot counters and observers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. In '04 a bunch of absentee ballots disappeared in my county - So I won't vote that way
any more. In addition, it seemed like absentee ballots weren't counted until after Bush was declared the winner.

I was also reading a story about Karl Rove called "Karl Rove In A Corner," from Atlantic magazine. A google will help you find it.

There is a story about Karl getting absentee ballots thrown out in the courts so that his candidate would win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrdlu Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm on a Signature Verification Board...
...and you may have cause for concern. We met for four hours Saturday and compared application signatures to ballot signatures on about 900 ballots. Three of the five people seemed to be looking for any reason to reject ballots. I didn't kick any myself but the board sent about twenty for further review. That resulted in all but one being accepted. So I feel pretty good about my judgement.

Back tonight to do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, I don't trust that it will be. However, in the huge voter rebellion that
is occurring all over the country, in the form of Absentee Ballot voting--in effect, a citizen revolt against the machines--I do see hope, and also the outlines of a strategy for achieving transparent vote counts. I think that what this huge increase in AB voting is telling us is that a lot of people are now onto the rigged electronics, and are trying to DO something about it, to get around the rigged system. The election reform movement has been very successful at raising consciousness, but it has not been successful at coming up with a STRATEGY for achieving our goal.

So here's the strategy: Mobilize all these many new rebellious voters to put pressure on LOCAL election officials to, a) HAND COUNT the Absentee Ballots, and b) POST the results BEFORE any electronics are involved. This is what Absentee Ballot voters WANT, and these are quite modest, common sense demands for this big block of voters. I think it's doable. And, as we succeed with this, more and more people will vote by AB, because that will be the only way to get your counted. (AB voting is already up to 50% and 60% in some places--in Calif, half the voters in the entire state are voting by AB!) (That's a lot of citizen clout.) Then, if necessary--and if we can--extend these two simple principles to the optiscan ballots (count the ballots, post the results before they are sent to the central electronic tabulators).

Thus, we create a paper ballot system BY DEFAULT. This strategy avoids a head-on collision with the chief obstacle to transparent vote counting, the billions of dollars in e-voting contracts (which has affected both Dem and Repub election officials and legislators). Let them keep their big contracts and lobbying perks and all the rest, but gradually erode the power of TRADE SECRET, PROPRIETARY programming code--which is owned and controlled by Bushite corporations--by organized AB voting groups in each county demanding that THEIR votes be treated as the AB voters want them to be--counted and posted apart from the electronic system.

Another aspect to this Absentee Ballot rebellion that appeals to me: It's like the Montgomery Bus Boycott, in the sense that, if you don't like this system that is oppressing you, STOP USING THEIR SEGREGATED BUSSES. Walk to work instead. If you don't like this rigged voting system, STOP ENDORSING IT BY VOTING ON THEIR MACHINES! Every time you willingly vote on their machines, you give more power to Diebold and ES&S to corrupt our democracy. They may be scanning your Absentee Ballot right into the rigged electronics, but why COOPERATE with this? Why endorse it? Why not fight it, REFUSE to vote on these machines, and DEMAND that YOUR ballot--and those of all other AB voters--be hand-counted?

It's a REBELLION. That's what I love about it. So let's help empower these latter day Rosa Parkses--who are refusing to vote on the goddamned rigged machines--and are doing so in such big numbers--and give this movement some leadership and focus. It is gift to election reform activists --a gift from the People.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC