Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Murray (D-WA) Now Says She'll Nix Alito. Here's Why:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
newswolf56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:43 PM
Original message
Sen. Murray (D-WA) Now Says She'll Nix Alito. Here's Why:
...As was discussed at his hearing, he has a troubling record of voting for the government and corporations and against individuals. He seems to favor the entrenched power over the little guy. His record does not give me the confidence that everyone who comes before the Court will be treated fairly.

I am also deeply concerned about Judge Alito's independence. We rely on our courts as a critical check and balance against government abuse. That independent check helps to protect our rights. This is especially important today because of the growing questions about the expansion of executive power. The Supreme Court will need to evaluate whether recent executive actions are constitutional. Here, Judge Alito's unbalanced, minority view of the scope of executive power tells me he does not have the independence to be an adequate check on government abuse of our rights.

Finally, I have serious doubts that Judge Alito will uphold our rights and liberties. One example is his hostility to the right to privacy. In the hearings, he refused to say that Roe v. Wade is "settled law," and he did not adequately explain his 1985 statement that the "Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion."


Full text of statement:

http://murray.senate.gov/news.cfm?id=250775

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes! Thank you, Patty Murray!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes! More good news! I supported her via Emily's List.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. no on Alito or no to cloture?? BIG DIFFERENCE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wrote her a nice email.. BEGGING for that! I'm a constituent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ok, your email did it!
I claimed that mine turned Feinstein ... so your can be the one that turned Murray. Congratulations! ;)

Absolutely excellent news. Now, will she support the filibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very well-reasoned and erudite...
but she left out that he's ticking time-bomb of reactionary whack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. LOL! Too diplomatic? LOL -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. It doesn't say how she'll vote for cloture...
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad she's voting no on Alito... but it would be nice to put her in the "No on Cloture" catagory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Well we better keep calling, emailing and faxing her then
i think she's listening. Two weeks ago she responded to my email saying she hadn't decided on Alito yet. She's since declared she'd vote against him. We can hope that if that is new today it means she supports the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Staffer at her office said "no decision yet" this afternoon.
He was fielding lots of calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yay!
I faxed her some of those very same words today. I'm glad she's not letting us down. She better support the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-28-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. Wouldn't it be something?
Wouldn't it be something it Senators and others brought up the fact that given "the growing questions about the expansion of executive power" and all the abuses, lies, crimes, investigations, indictments, etc. this is NOT the time to roll over for this appointment?

Now THAT would be a REAL fight.

(Are they insane or merely compromised?)



:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC