Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Obama is voting no and then pissing on the guys who started filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:49 AM
Original message
If Obama is voting no and then pissing on the guys who started filibuster
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 09:56 AM by blm
and saying they were wrong to do it on NATIONAL TV, what kind of signal is he sending to his constituents and the senators who are still on the fence?

He's telling his constituents that he's not voting for cloture out of his own convictions, but is being forced (I guess by them). Coercion not conviction - pretty damn INELEGANT, Sen. Obama.

He's telling other senators that the filibuster isn't legitimate in this case. Which is BULLSHIT!

I have never once said one untoward thing about Obama - but his performance today was DEPLORABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. I totally agree, blm...
I am appalled. WTF is up with this guy?

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
42. He's getting citified.
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 02:16 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Too bad. The transformation is beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
57. HE IS NOW ON BOARD. HE WILL FILLIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. Good. Because I expect Obama to play a big role in the Dem
counter-punch, and if all goes as I hope, it started two days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. HE IS NOW ON BOARD. HE WILL FILLIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. That was not the only thing I had problems with.
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 09:52 AM by Mass
He basically said the Democrats did not work enough with the Republicans to get things accomplished, that they were too partisan.

That did not strike me.

I stopped after this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
58. HE IS NOW ON BOARD. HE WILL FILLIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
78. I think he is mainly about his own
political future, as he sees it, not about doing what is right for America. He is about Obama, not about us, so he is trying to "triangiulate."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm horrified.
Didn't see the segment, but :wtf: does he think he'll accomplish with such talk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
59. HE IS NOW ON BOARD. HE WILL FILLIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps he's not jaded enough yet due to lack of experience.
He sounds way too idealistic to me, and needs to wake up and smell the coffee.
I like Obama, but this is a bad move IMO.
And I'll be sending an e-mail or phoning to let him know that.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't know about that.
What he said doesn't sound idealistic to me. It sounds very DLC like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. "It sounds very DLC like..."
Couldn't agree more. I was so goddammed disgusted with his "schpeil".

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't trust him, I think he a party politician above a people politician

I think it is more about him then people realize.

I haven't trusted him for awhile due to a few of his votes.

I am not overly impressed with the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgewater_Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. He's Doing Better This Week Than Last Week
Obama needs to stop talking like a Senator, but he's still drawing contrasts.

I thought the little dig about working with "reasonable Republicans" was pretty good: Democrats will try to offer solutions, and REASONABLE Republicans will too.

Then we'll be left with NO Repunks, and the conclusion becomes obvious: THERE. ARE. NO. REASONBLE. REPUBLICANS.

A pretty good and accurate Democratic message, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
60. HE IS NOW ON BOARD. HE WILL FILLIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago1 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. IF, IF, IF He DOES NOT join the Filibuster...I WILL NEVER EVER
VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN.

This is sooooooooooooooooooooooo disgusting. It's a slap in the face to Kerry and Kennedy and I have a feeling THAT HE WILL PAY for this in the future. (HE BETTER!!!!!)

I'm going to wait to see what he does. HE BETTER WATCH HIS BACK AND VOTE FOR THE FILIBUSTER. (I can't believe he's doing this)


START THE REVOLUTION
START THE IMPEACHMENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
61. HE IS NOW ON BOARD. HE WILL FILLIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. I just cursed him out on my tv..not a great way to start my Sunday.
I honestly believe that he is a GOP plant. The GOP put in a ridiculous candidate to run against him, and I thought then it was very deliberate. The minute he voted to confirm Rice, I wrote him off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. I agree w your assessment blm
In the interview with Steph Obama is undermining the use of the filibuster and talking about "when Alito is confirmed" ...also he's pretty vague on why he believes the Dems didn't do enough in the earlier stages (given a sham hearing I thought they did OK).

What's up with Obama? I hope Illinois will get on his case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. The problem is they still view this
as an issue that relates to them representing their constituents. And as Kerry pointed out it is an American issue. There is no doubt that the 38% number CNN put up is way off, if only because the number of unsure was so high. Given that this is a lifetime appointment and nearly half the country (or more than that in reality) opposes this nomination, not only should a filibuster ensue, but many should be calling on Bush to pull the nomination. This is extremely divisive. It was divisive before the filibuster efforts began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. Man can give a good speech
but apparently it means nothing. I am tired of those that talk a good game and sell you out when you are not looking, at least he is selling us out right before our eyes. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. He said on "This Week" that he will support the filibuster
He said he is outside of American values, not just Democratic values.

But he felt that Democrats needed to rely less on inside the beltway procedural maneuvers in the future.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. If he did... he said it when I was no longer listening...
and the lead-up to it was not encouraging enough to keep me there without bursting a blood-vessel.

I was very upset with him and his "bi-partisan" bullsh*t. That ship has sailed!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. It was the first thing he answered. He looks stressed. He is a bit
mealy mouthed, I must agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. I tuned in just after he started... must've missed it.
The rest of his interview SUCKED! Who would have known he was SUPPORTIVE in any sense of the word after that performance? What is the matter with him???

Where the hell are the LOUD and PROUD to be a DEMOCRAT Democrats? JUst wait until Biden hits CNN at noon... I can't wait to hear what THAT bozo has to say. If ever there was a Sunday when the country and this Party needed to hear a POSITOVE and UNITED Democratic mnessage, it was today. And what do we get? The same lousy Democratic Party Gumbo of pessimism, bi-partisanship collusion, and bullsh*t.

I may just turn the tv off before I need a paramedic!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. He will vote for it but spoke against it which is nonsupportive.
People who SUPPORT a filibuster will speak up for it. Obama made clear that he will vote no but is not taking a supporting role.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Yea, he will give the bare minimum. A NO vote on cloture, while
condemning his own party's tactics.

Oh Barack, you cannot ride your high horse in Washington DC and get anywhere, if that is what you're trying to do.

I'm so disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Obama will be a ONE TERM SENATOR unless he filibusters.
I am in his state. I will work as hard as I know how to see him defeated in the next Primary he stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Me too, Ben! I will do everything in my power to see him defeated
and I told him so in my email last night.:grr: This is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. How can a young fellow seem so promising...
and be such a jerk once elected? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. I don't know, but I am SO disappointed in him! I worked my behind off for
his campaign, donated money, went to rallies, bought his campaign buttons and handed them out to everyone who wanted one, wore Obama t-shirts and put his bumper sticker on my car....AND HE ENDS UP LIKE THIS? *sigh* I am BEYOND pissed off at this point.:grr: That was a SHAMEFUL thing he just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. I worked for Nancy Skinner in the primaries.
And I really wish she had won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Me too. Maybe she'll run again. I'll work for her! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. She moved to Detroit...
So I think she is a Michigan resident now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
herbbrown Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. She Did
She's running for congress in my district against Knollenberg, I'll work for her. I live in Royal Oak a suburb of Detroit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. And didn't John Kerry give Obama the keynote speech
at 'Kerry's' convention and sort of give Obama a national stage on which to introduce himself to the nation? Heck of a way to say thanks, IMHO. I can see grumbling about the tactics. (Most people at DU wish this effort had started weeks if not months ago.) But at least Sens. Kennedy & Kerry are doing something about it and trying not to let a dangerous extremist ideologue sit on the Supreme Court for the next 30 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
79. My son encountered him as he got off a plane in
Washington. My son identified himself as a constituent (he lives in Chicago) and thanked Obama for his work. Obama blew him off. Not polite at all. Mind you, my son is 26 years old, was dressed in a business suit, and looked quite professional. He didn't look like some silly or immature political groupie trying to suck up to power. He was just trying to politely express appreciation for the guy's work.

Now my son is pissed. He feels personally insulted, and I doubt he will ever vote for Obama again.

I know that is foolish--we need Dems in the House and the Senate, and it is wrong to harm the party and the nation because of personal pique. But that does happen, and politicians used to be aware of that.

What ever happened to gladhanding politicians who thought you had to be polite to constituents to win and hold office?

I think Obama might be getting a big head from being considered such a rising star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. Unbelievably TRAITOROUS at this point. We stand together or fall
apart on this particular issue. Obama should be a one-termer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. He's being a COMPLETE ASS. Can you believe what he said???
The Democrats are using Senate procedure to stop the repuke agenda/Alito confirmation instead of going out and talking to the peole? WHAT A FUCKING ASSHOLE. I hope the Dems make him eat those words.:grr:

Obama is not my kind of Democrat. Damn. I had such high hopes for the guy. Now, I'm not so sure I even LIKE HIM.:( shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. This was a really disappointing performance on This Week
Seems like he's shooting for the middle, to be one of the gang of 14 moderate types.

Not what we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. That is just absurd
Are Americans voting on this? No. Are the lockstep Republicans ever going to waiver from WHATEVER Mr. Emperor says they must do? Apparently not. We are a miniority in the senate. But not in the country. So maybe the ordinary citizens should storm the bastille of the supreme court or something?

Obama is a fool. I'll say it again-he still thinks it's 1995. He doesn't seem to realize that things are a wee bit different now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. If Dems weren't talking to the people, every senate office would not have
FULL voice mails and fax machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balzac Donating Member (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
26. Obama is just like the rest, i suppose.
I guess it shouldn't suprise us anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. His wonderful speech at the Dem Convention gave us a lot of hope.
Maybe that is his main strong point, giving speeches.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O.M.B.inOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. I'm still sore from his comments last January re: Nov '04 election
He declared that he was "Absolutely convinced" that Bush won the election in Ohio. A person with an open mind would have been open to the facts. Him and 98 other Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
33. DLC trickery comes home to roost
How disappointing, let's change his mind okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
34. he can't decide whether to be a club member or and activist.
Slick stuff from the freshman. He needs some re-education of what he was sent there to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
36. We need to keep faxing/emailing/calling him...
this time with a critique of his "This Week" preformance. Just let him know that while we appreciate his support on the filibuster, his comments undrmine all the hard work his Democratic base has done. Remind him that the sanctity of the US Constiution is ALWAYS a legitimate reason to filibuster... and it should be a concern for EVERY SENATOR - not just the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
37. We need one more vote for the greatest.
He needs to know we are pissed. I couldn't believe my ears watching him on TV this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. Small minds, no souls - I hate the strategerists!
If he can't see what's at stake, he is in the wrong place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yeah, WTF is going on with Obama?
How did they get to him?

He's obviously running very very scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. This fillibuster thing has separated the men from the boys. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. I think his issues are with our sales pitch, not so much the filibuster???
On this I agree with him:

"We need to recognize ... that, if we're going to oppose a nominee we've got to persuade the American people that their values are at stake," (shortened version of his comments.) Obama said.

We DO need organized/persuasive/marketing if you will. If we oppose Alito and America doesn't understand WHY, then we've got "issues." However in the interest of time, we have to filibuster FIRST and educate later.

:shrug:

He certainly isn't helping the cause he speaks of though, by going on national TV bitching about "tactics." Has he heard of a telephone? Call Reid, Kennedy and Kerry and share your thoughts PRIVATELY Mr. Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. But that's what one says in private meetings NOT on national TV.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. ITA!
Absolutely right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
65. But how does one " persuade the American people"
when the press is more interested in reporting on Mrs. Alito's theatrical blubber-fest instead of her hubby's creepy take on the Unitary Executive Doctrine?

When the Constitution is in trouble it is Barack's job to protect it.

Even when the media does their best to dissemble upon and twist ANY message the Dems have, it is his duty to rise above it and do the right thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. Excellent point. Though, according to a thread by prosense in GD
Americans are leaning toward the "persuaded" side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Then, I'm guessing that Barack is speaking to someone other than
the Democrats.

And I just thought of this: there was absolutely no other way to go BUT a filibuster, given that the Republicans number 55 and appear to be voting in their usual lockstep by command of the Chimperor.

I don't know what DLC adviser worked with Sen. Obama on his comments, but I guess there must be some method to the madness of his statements. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #43
81. Also, if his issue is that they have to do a better job making the case
HE was on TV - complaining about the "tactics". He COULD have used the same time to give a cogent coherent argument for why Alito should be stopped. Obama taught law at the University of Chicago, this should have been child's play. Kerry has written some very good arguments, but he seems able to speak only on the Senate floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #81
83. Hard to argue against that! I totally agree with you.
Obama is an amazing orator, he should have taken an opportunity to show how it's done if he felt it was being done "wrong."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
45. Agreed.
I have been on the fence about Obama. He's new to the senate, have been waiting to see where I stand with him. He has straddled pretty well until now. Today has shown an aspect of Obama that we just don't need any more of in the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
46. The filibuster has a pretty shitty history in his neck of the woods
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 03:28 PM by dsc
The civil rights acts of 48, 52, and 55 were all filibustered to death. The civil rights act of 64 endured a massive filibuster as well. For someone with his backround the filibuster is hardly a great thing. On edit The Senate never outlawed lynching in large part due to filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Thanks for a different perspective.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. thank you
I hate to see Obama savaged for a natural adversion to a tool which as been used so harshly against his people in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Obama is saying that Dem leadership didn't do its job weeks ago
He's not criticizing them for filibustering now - he's saying that the filibuster - especially a last minute, cobbled-together, one - should not be our only hope from day one. Dems did NOT do their job on this one. They caved on Roberts, they ducked on Alito and hoped that they could get away with just voting no but not having to take a real stand. Now that they've been pushed into it, they're scrambling.

A filibuster would have been unnecessary if they had been more effective and organized at the outset - they could have convinced the public how bad Alito is. And they should have been laying the groundwork for a filibuster weeks ago instead of cutting and running and having to have Kerry and Kennedy pull their butts out of the fire.

THAT'S what Obama is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. I agreed with him on that part, but that's NOT what should be conveyed
on National TV the day before. I grant that it was a newbie mistake, but, it still hurts with overall perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
68. Dupe.
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 08:09 PM by quiet.american
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #46
69. Dupe.
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 08:12 PM by quiet.american
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #46
70. Don't mean to be harsh, but applied to Obama, this reasoning is nonsense.
Firstly, Obama is not someone whose experience has only been confined all his life to one location. He was born in Hawaii, and his childhood was spent primarily there and in Indonesia. He then spent his young adulthood in New York (Columbia University) and Boston (Harvard). After he finished law school and worked for some time in the corporate world, he then ended up in Illinois in public service.

Secondly, Obama is very seasoned in the public realm and is used to pushing back against entrenched bureaucracy, as related in his book, Dreams From My Father, which details the many struggles he worked through as a community organizer and civil rights lawyer in Illinois.

Lastly, suggesting he is frightened off the filibuster because of it's so-called history just doesn't add up. There are many ways and means of government which have been used to advance less than decent objectives -- if he's frightened of the tools of government, he just did an awful lot of work to become a senator, apparently all for naught. Obama is much more sophisticated and intelligent than this.

I would hazard my own theory is that Obama is actually far too fair-minded for the present state of our government, a government so one-sidely corrupt that one majority leader is under indictment, and the other is the target of a serious securities violation investigation. This is Obama's wakeup call that his honeymoon is over with the Democratic party base. He's got roll up his sleeves to the fact that this country right now is in a state of, as Al Gore put it, "a kind of cold civil war," and our party needs every fighter we can get.

It will be interesting to see where he goes from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. Very interesting perspective
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. No matter where he goes he is still black
and the filibuster is not highly thought of by blacks. I didn't see This Week but from what I gather the jist of his comments were that winning by filibuster doesn't make him feel warm and fuzzy and that we should have done our work getting a majority of the people to oppose this man. Given that the filibuster was used for literally decades to keep people like him down it is more than reasonable for him to find winning using that method more than a little distasteful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #77
80. Sorry, still doesn't wash.
I'm not sure what you're basing your ideas on, but I'm an African-American, and we don't sit around moaning about how the filibuster has kept us down, and how we don't like it! I've never heard anything remotely like that ever.

Obama's reasons for opposing the filibuster are politically based -- it has nothing to do with this curious "race" theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
52. He's NOT pissing on the guys who started the filibuster-he's pissing on
those who DIDN'T plan for it weeks ago. He's obviously ticked off - and rightly so - that the Democratic leadership did nothing to lay the groundwork for defeating Alito, that they were so disorganized that we've reached this point in the final days of scrambling to mount a filibuster.

Listen to what he's saying - he's not annoyed with Kennedy and Kerry - he's angry at the lack of leadership!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. I hear ya...but that is what private meetings are for not national TV.
It really came off to alot of people that those who started the filibuster are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #55
72. And when he gets nowhere in private meetings, what's he supposed
to do?

The word is that Obama has been warning the Democratic leadership for more than a month that they had to get their sh*t together on Alito, to no avail. And since he's a freshman Senator down at the bottom of the pecking order, there wasn't much he could do - except refuse to be a good boy and cover up for the inept leadership when he was asked his opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. Could that be because the "leaders" were going to let aLIEto slide
until they heard from US? Keep the calls FAXES and emails flying. The Fundies are preaching today Lets keep those in boxes full of OUR message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. Bingo!
They were just hoping it would all go away and they wouldn't have to take any tough stands that would make them look "obstructionist" - something they fear more than Superman feared cryptonite.

As if going along with Bush has been working for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
64. It's been front page on
Google News All Fucking Day for krissakes!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
71. Glad to see you wake up. Obama has been a disappointment since
his election, in the main. Taking instructions or at the very least "ideas" from the DLC and its consultants and so-called strategists will do it for ya every time. That's being charitable toward him -- I'd really rather not think all these times he's disappointed were his own failings, unassisted. But it's one or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
75. i am not an obama fan, but from what i understand reading his
words, it agreed to the filibuster, he doesnt like how they have to do a filibuster on a technicality. i gathered from his comment he is saying, sad state of affairs this is how we have to do the filibuster. i dont know if it is because dems are the minority or because no repugs came to the other side. but that is what i got from his words. i dont know for sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
76. Actually Obama is smarter than I had thought initially
He is laying groundwork to be a statesman and not just
another party hack, me too, yes sir, kinda guy.

I smell a presidential run coming in 2012. He has figured out
he can never win presidency by getting only the left leaning
democratic votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmatthan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
82. I have condemned Obama for almost ALL

his actions after his speech at the Convention.

And I am not even American!

He got a great big head for that speech and since then has behaved Republican Lite!

And because he got so much criticism, he cut off accessto himself through email!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
84. locking
per request of original poster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC