Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Offcial Recall Obama Thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:05 PM
Original message
Offcial Recall Obama Thread
yeeeeeeaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrgh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unproductive - he's still new and needs to grow - TV isn't easy and he
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 03:24 PM by blm
worded his position poorly. For that I am angry.

We have every right to be angry at this juncture, but no right to cannibalize our own at this time, especially for a mistake that TV doesn't make easier.

I thought his PERFORMANCE was deplorable, but recalling is just cannibalizing someone for a POORLY WORDED MISTAKE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He's voting no on Alito
and he's voting no on cloture

I hope this thread is a joke, because he is going to do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. OBAMA IS ON OUR SIDE... KNOCK IT OFF and get to work contacting
the ones who still need convincing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. I don't see how it was worded poorly.
It was very clear to me. He said that he supports the filibuster, but he was upset that the party had let it get to the point where last minute parliamentary manuevering was necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. It came off like the maneuver itself was wrong.
And the FACT is that the senate hearings made plenty of points why Alito is wrong for the court, but the MEDIA played it down. Dems need to call out the media for not reporting the substance of the Dem arguments.

THAT observation would have made a difference at this point.

The poll numbers show alot of Republicans and Independents are UNSURE about Alito which means the MEDIA didn't give them the reportage of the pertinent facts that they needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I don't necessarily agree with his reasoning,
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 04:50 PM by drm604
there may very well have been nothing the Democrats could have done, so he could be mistaken about that. But, at this point, that's basically a matter of opinion that will never be resolved.

I don't think that it came off as him believing that the maneuver was wrong: saying "I support the filibuster" doesn't give that impression to me.

If anything, I think it came off as reluctant support for a maneuver of last resort. Most last resorts are distasteful and uncomfortable, that's why they're held till last. Being uncomfortable with it, and regretting that it's become necessary isn't, at least in my mind, the same as saying that it's wrong.

ON Edit: Fixed grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarienComp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. i like cookies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Thanks for reminding me to order Girl Scout cookies.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. popcorn not to your liking?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tell me what he said that was so evil or untrue, eh? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Has anyone ever said you're a drama queen
or king, or whatever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. OBAMA IS ON OUR SIDE...HE IS SUPPORTING THE FILIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. I recall his convention speech .
It seems consistent with what he is saying now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nonsense! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Jeez!!! He is voting "NO" on Alito, and "YES" on the filibuster!
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 03:16 PM by Wordie
What more do you need? There are lots of very misleading articles about the interview where he apparently expressed reservations, which is a minor issue in comparison with what really counts, his VOTE!

Don't let misleading msm articles cause you to attack someone on OUR side!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Ditto. Couldn't have stated any better. Thank you.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. EXACTLY! OBAMA IS VOTING FOR THE FILIBUSTER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wish I Could Recall Oblama! But I'm Not In Illinois
He seemed to have so much promise when I heard him speak at the DNC in 04

Now he just seems to be another inside the beltway or DLC type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. OBAMA IS SUPPORTING THE FILIBUSTER
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 03:27 PM by ticapnews

Senator Barack Obama says he will support a filibuster to block a confirmation vote on Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito.



But the Illinois Democrat also says his party relies too heavily on procedural maneuvers like filibusters and Democrats could do a better job of persuading the American people directly.

Obama spoke this morning on A-B-C's news talk show "This Week."

http://www.wqad.com/Global/story.asp?S=4425639&nav=1sW7

Saying we need to do a better job talking to the American people is not a bad thing.

DO NOT BUY THE BULLSHIT FROM THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!
The corporate media is spinning this as Obama criticizing the filibuster but HE IS SUPPORTING THE FILIBUSTER.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That's why he should've kept his
fucking mouth shut!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. The Democrats are not effective at pursuading the
American people directly. There are far too many Dems in the Hillary mold who triangulate every position and do not take a solid stand on issues. What is wrong with saying, "I was wrong on voting to authorize Bush to attack Iraq?" yet Hillary wont say that. Most Americans are against the war.

The Democrats need to establish CLEAR and SUCCINCT differences between them and the Republicans. One way they can do this is to rid the party of the pro big business and Republican lite DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heewack Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not here.
I can only laugh at the idea that Obama needs to be stricken from the party. Like it nor not Obama is the future of our party. HE IS AN ASSET!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. That's right
let's tear down the next generation of Democratic leaders because they don't vote our way on one issue.

How adult and helpful to our cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. He's been a disappointment. Compare his actual votes with campaign promise
there is the stench of national ambition coupled with the Hillary-esque fear that the NASCAR zealots in the South won't vote for a black man named Obama unless he proves he'll compromise his ideals to their whims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. He has a very progressive voting record
and what exactly did you think his campaign promises were? I am in Illinois and I heard him loud and clear that he wanted to work with both sides of the aisle to attain some progressive policies. He had a rep in the state senate for working with both sides.

Sheesh, I think that it was everyone's expectations of him that were incorrect. What did you expect? For him to turn his back and raise his right fist in protest? To be a combination of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton? To try to increase the partisan divide?

He is a statesman in the mold of his mentor and friend, Paul Simon, who won great respect for his honesty and integrity from both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Exactly, I wonder if the DUers who bash the hell out of Obama. . .
. . .truly listened to his speech. It was about bringing this country together. Obama was my state senator and he is a neighbor. This man is a true liberal, however as a US Senator as opposed to a state senator he represents a more diverse constituency. I remember attending an anti-war rally in 2002 at the Federal Building and the speech he gave blew me away. I walked up to him introduced myself as a neighbor and told him he was going to be the next senator from the state of Illinois. I have been a fan ever since that day. There are so many DUers micromanaging and second guessing all of his actions its just disgusting. I'm confident when he is up for re-election in 2010 he will win again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Check out this post by KharmaTrain
On another thread, I think he is right on:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2411978#2412177

Also, for those who need their memmories refreshed, here's a link to video of his speech at the convention. Listen carefully now.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/07/28/1313225
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. He's been more moderate than progressive compared to what I had been led
to expect from his national speeches.

According to Eagle Forum, Illinois is more progressively represented by Bobby L. Rush, Jesse Louis Jackson, Luis V. Gutierrez, Rahm Emanuel, Danny K. Davis, Melissa L. Bean, Lane A. Evans, Jan Schakowsky, and here's a shock, Republican Mark Steven Kirk.

I'd hoped Obama would be on the progressive end of the Illinois Democratic Party. He's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Comparing a Senator to Representatives is like comparing amples to oranges
The representatives you mentioned, including the Kirk, come from congressional districts that are liberal. Obama represents the entire state not one particular congressional district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. His voting record is identical to Carl Levin and Pat Leahy
tied for 17th most progressive, per the Patrick Henry Think Tank
http://patrickhenrythinktank.org/sen-score7.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruthStream_dot_org Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. What a HUGE disappointment
Audacity of hope my ass. Audacity of cutting and running from the Constitution is more like it. Scumbag. Wasnt this the 'up and coming star of the democratic party'? God help us all. What a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
33. Are you fucking kidding me?
If you're not from Illinois, go wander off somewhere.

Besides the fact that you can't "recall" a US senator, this is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. Locking
This thread works for the defeat of a Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC