Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Rahm Emanuel nearly lost the election -- A post that deserves its own thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:26 AM
Original message
How Rahm Emanuel nearly lost the election -- A post that deserves its own thread
Hardhead wrote:

Emmanuel's strategy is not what won this election.

From Matt Stoller:


Democrats pushing the conservative line, or giving credit to Rahm Emanuel, don't get it. Rahm Emanuel did everything he could to lose the House. His recruiting and use of money was strategically unwise, and he was bailed out by a national trend that brought us the Senate, the Governorships, state legislative chambers, and state constitutional officers all over the country.

Rahm Emanuel did his best to force Howard Dean to move money out of party building and into his terrible TV ad program that lost IL-06. He sniped at Dean, at Moveon, at George Soros, at blogs, at anyone he could. He ran scared, and he put his thumb on the scale against liberal Democrats. He couldn't even win in his own backyard, with the milquetoast Dan Seals and charismatically moderate Tammy Duckworth. Most significantly, for a good amount of time he didn't want Democrats to mention Iraq, period. If Rahm Emanuel were actually been a loyal Democrat instead of someone hellbent on sabotaging liberals, imagine how many seats we could have picked up.

It's clear that what happened last night was a repudiation of Bush and the Iraq war, and the beginning of the era of partial power for the progressive movement. It's the very very beginning. Realize that the 'victory for conservative Democrats' meme is being pushed all over Limbaugh and by the White House. It's false.



http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/11/8/13534/5744

Rick Perlstein at Joe Lieberman Weekly agrees with that assessment:

(Edit: The New Republic!!)


Democrats have won back the House. Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), nearly tripped over himself on the way to the microphone to claim the credit. In fact, while the tidal wave in the House looks like a bit of strategic genius by Emanuel--and pundits are starting to call it that way (Howard Fineman on MSNBC noted that the Democrats even picked up a seat in Kentucky, where the 3rd District candidate was John Yarmuth--"Emanuel's fourth choice!" Fineman exclaimed, as if in awe of the power possessed by Emanuel's mere table scraps)--in race after race, it actually represents the apotheosis of forces Emanuel has doubted all long: the netroots.

In two competitive House races in the Bluegrass State, Emanuel's first choices lost by 9 and 12 points. In the 2nd District it was Colonel Mike Weaver, the cofounder of Commonwealth Democrats, a group of conservative Democratic state legislators. In the 4th, it was Ken Lucas, a former congressman whom Robert Novak recently called "moderate conservative" in a column Emanuel's "recruiting coup" in coaxing Lucas out of retirement. Both were the kind of candidates Emanuel has favored in his famous nationwide recruiting drive. Yarmuth, meanwhile, was founder of the state's first alternative newspaper, said things on the campaign trail things like "the No Child Left Behind Act ... is a plan deliberately constructed to create 'failing' schools," and called for "a universal health care system in which every citizen has health insurance independent of his or her employment."

It was a pattern repeated across the country. New Hampshire's 1st District delivered Carol Shea-Porter, a former social worker who got kicked out of a 2005 Presidential appearance for wearing a T-shirt that said turn your back on bush. That might have been her fifteen minutes of fame--if, last night, she hadn't defeated two-term Republican incumbent Jeb Bradley. For the chance to face him, however, she had to win a primary against the DCCC's preferred candidate, Jim Craig--whom Rahm Emanuel liked to much he had the unusual move of contributing $5000 to his primary campaign. Shea-Porter dominated Craig by 20 points--and then was shut out by the DCCC for general election funds.

Not all Emanuel's losing recruits were beaten in primaries. Some were beaten in the general election. Christine Jennings, a banker and former Republican gunning for Katherine Harris's former House seat lost in a squeaker to conservative Republican Vern Buchanan. Dan Seals, a black moderate in the Barack Obama mold who criticized the Democratic Party even in speeches to Democratic crowds, lost to the Republican incumbent in Emanuel's backyard, Illinois's 10th District--as did the DCCC's most talked-about recruit, Tammy Duckworth of Illinois's 6th. Emanuel poured as astonishing $3 million into her campaign. It bought her a four-point defeat. Activists say the money would have been better spent on all the promising candidates to whom Rahm wouldn't give the time of day.

Many of them won anyway. John Hall is poised to become the Democrats' version of Sonny Bono--a former environmental and anti-nuclear activist and co-author of the hit 1970s hit "Still the One," he just won New York's 19th District House seat. Chris Carney, now heading to Washington to represent Pennsylvania's 10th, beat beleaguered incumbent (and alleged-strangler) Don Sherwood. "Until Carney was ahead by double digits," complained Howie Klein of DownWithTyranny, a blog that backed his candidacy, "Rahm wouldn't take his phone calls." Larry Kissell, a high school social studies teacher, is, as of this writing, in a statistical dead heat with an incumbent Republican from of all places, North Carolina. Says Klein: "If Rahm had a little bit of foresight to see this guy was for real, and to see that he was a candidate who could have won, a little bit of money would have made all the difference for him."


http://www.tnr.com/user/nregi.mhtml?i=w061106&s=perlstein110806
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a good repudiation for the DLC crowd.
It would seem Emmanuel has the reverse Midas touch.

Joe LiEberman Weekly - LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is fascinating
Rahm Emanuel is taking credit for the hard work of the netroots and Howard Dean's 50 state strategy.

Why am I not surprised?

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Because his skill at "taking credit" is equal only to...
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 05:49 AM by dicksteele
...his ability to avoid responsibility.

A lot of people who made this victory a reality
could honestly ask, "Rahm WHO? Never heard of him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Good point... I've never heard of the guy.
I have, however, heard of Dr. Howard Dean and his 50 State Strategy.

It makes good sense and it worked. The Right Wing Wurlitzer is such a behemoth
it can't focus on more than one challenge at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They are tryingto demolish both Dean and Kerry
They want them both out of office by 2008.

Think about that -- no dems to the left of Dean or Kerry allowed in leadership.

Unless they are wealthy, white "limousine libs" that only care about a few social issues but not others.

Or wealthy, southern boilerplate demagogues that quote the Bible but then take slush money and screw the working class with free trade deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. and who pushed Dean for chairman??? it was grassroots/netroots
constant pressure at the state level -- the DC dems were looking at 1-3 other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. 'netroots'...
That is a word I must remember!

I've been trying to think of it all day.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinaforjustice Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stoller & Pearlstein Have It Right.
A few more Emanuel-selected candidates and we would still be the minority in the House and the Senate.
The DLC/Blue Dog Democrats need to sent to the pound. Those dogs don't hunt!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Very interesting article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. These 'pundits' and Emmanuel can talk crap all they want. The
thinking members of the party know what brought back the House, Senate, and the Governorships. They know it was Dean.

And they know the DLC is all boast and bullshit. All show, no go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. The thinking members of the party knew what happened to Kerry.
But the "conventional wisdom" among all the AAR talking heads and Dem insiders is that Kerry insulted our troops and deserves to be ostracized.

Which kills Murtha, too (Kerry's chief ally in the House)

and elevates DLC Hoyer.

Who met with Bush and Pelosi yesterday as an heir apparent despite not having run for Majority Leader against Murtha yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. That's what I am talking about! A wonderful post. We didn't work this hard
to hand over the party to Republican-lites, or Dem-neocons. We must all let Pelosi know exactly how we feel and keep encouraging Mr. Dean to stay in the fight. He deserves more credit for this win than he is getting. Surely the likes of Rangel, Jackson-Lee, Conyers, Kucinich will not roll over for this. We want the newbies among us to understand how strongly we feel about keeping our party away from this danger of abandoning its true base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. I said it a few months ago: first we win, then we clean house.
The work has only just begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thepurpose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. Be concern with Rahm's eagerness to court K Street. That's not why the
American public chose to give us a chance. I think everyone us have had enough of that bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. What are Rahm's ties to AIPAC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. I believe he is
So there is this article...

http://www.mail-archive.com/political-research@yahoogroups.com/msg05979.html

But it sounds so, uhh, slanted that I question everything it says. So I'm wondering if anyone here has better info on this guy. I hadn't really heard that much about him until this election cycle. Anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Sheldon Drobny was on Malloy last night - and Drobny said
that Emmanuel did not invest in Seals campaign because Seals was "not sufficiently supportive of Israel" -- Seals supports Israel and wants there to be an effective peace process, but does not talk like a true Zionist (as in Israel can never ever do any wrong, Israel should never, ever compromise with anyone, militarism is THE way to keep Israel safe).

:(

Emmanuel should be CANNED. He brought in tons and tons of $$$$$ -- and the money was wasted because of his stupid decisions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
36. here's just one page of links
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 08:58 AM by notadmblnd
when I entered Rahm Emanual + AIPAC on "The Google", Enjoy.

Gorilla in the Room
The FBI is probing AIPAC's involvement in keeping Israel supporter Rep. ... Rahm Emanuel is the chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. ...
gorillaintheroom.blogspot.com/ - 40k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

Fwd: Who is Rahm Emanuel?
Israel lobby > Rahm Emanuel > Democratic Party ... a single war party, controlled by the Israeli government, AIPAC and Israeli operatives like Rahm Emanuel. ...
www.mail-archive.com/political-research@yahoogroups.com/msg05979.html - 11k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

AIPAC's Hold
In early March, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) held its ... Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chair Rahm Emanuel, ...
www.thenation.com/doc/20060814/aipacs_hold - 34k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

Why Have Democrats NOT Pointed Out Bush's Lies?
Enter Rahm Emanuel, chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. ... Despite the fact that AIPAC was recently busted for spying on the United ...
www.rense.com/general74/lies.htm - 38k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

MyDD :: Democrats Party Like It's 2002
There is something missing from Rahm Emanuel's discussion on Meet the Press ... is your source that Democrats' position on this is being driven by AIPAC? ...
www.mydd.com/story/2005/10/4/15943/4446 - 107k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

The Blog | RJ Eskow: Rahm Emanuel: Democratic Time Bomb | The ...
Newsweek has a story in its latest issue about Rahm Emanuel. ... Please forgive me, but I personally believe that the AIPAC control of congress will become ...
www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/rahm-emanuel-democratic_b_30089.html - 53k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

CLOAK AND DAGGER Internet Magazi
AIPAC INQUIRY WIDENS. It can now be reported that a Federal Grand Jury in ... this is noted Mega-Mossad North American representative Rahm Emanuel (click) ...
www.cloakanddagger.de/CLOAKANDDAGGER.DE_TOM%20HENEGHAN/cloak_IEAR%20Oct26.htm - 38k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

The Bestiary
Photo of Rahm and Clinton Rahm Emanuel (Rahmbo, Rahmses) ... AIPAC/WINEP alums are quite influential in Republican and Democratic circles alike, ...
www.smithbowen.net/linfame/bestiary.html - 8k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

AIPAC judge: I'll decide what's harmful
AIPAC judge: I'll decide what's harmful ... and Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.), the members of Congress also told Annan that the U.N. also must "formally respond as ...
www.washingtonjewishweek.com/main.asp?SectionID=4&SubSectionID=4&ArticleID=4344&TM=58.018 - 27k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter

AIPAC's Dangerous Grip on Washington by Ari Berman
AIPAC's executive director spent twenty-seven minutes reading the "roll call" of ... Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chair Rahm Emanuel, ...
www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/AIPAC'S_Dangerous_Grip.html - 12k - Cached - Similar pages - Filter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henryman Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm disappointed also that Duckworth didn't win. But...
for every dollar Emanuel put into Duckworth's TV commercials, the republicans had to at least match that in their ads. This was the most disgusting, negative campaign I could ever imagine from the republican committee. Millions spent on this campaign meant less available for other campaigns on both sides. Even the Chicago Tribune endorsed Duckworth. The sad fact is that the VFW endorsed her opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I also don't think...
...that insulting Emmanuel for chosing Duckworth is a particularly useful activity, as was done in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. The OP is an excerpt from a New Republic article.
I don't think it's an insult to Duckworth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Dubin chose Duckworth
That is one race that really doesn't apply because she had support from a lot of people, including Clak and Kerry and Max Cleland. That's Henry Hyde's seat and she just didn't win. It would be like expecting to take a senate seat in Utah, the people have to change before the vote changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. I still have lingering resentment about Duckworth because she was chosen
by the DCCC over Christine Cegelis during the primary. Cegelis was the candidate that the grassroots of that district wanted and has worked very, very, very hard for over two campaign cycles. Cegelis is a true progressive and then the DCCC anointed Duckworth in the primary and spent big $$ on Duckworth so she would beat Cegelis. Duckworth DID NOT LIVE in the district!! No one in that district knew who she was at the start of the primary while Cegelis had 100's of people walking and calling and distributing fliers for her. Emmanuel (and Kerry and Clark) decided they knew better what candidate people would vote for (an injured Iraqi vet) and did not pay attention to the fact that Cegelis was the better candidate -- Cegelis would have energized the base and she would've won. Duckworth is the candidate who they could've controlled more easily in the Congress than Cegelis and Duckworth had the 'surface characteristics' that they thought predicted success to the dumb public who wouldn't be interested in the deep, controversial thinking of someone like Cegelis -- who spoke with sophistication about international relations and monetary policy and ecology and...

I am SICK of the 'higher-ups' in the party anointing candidates and telling us who we like and who we don't.

HEY EMMANUEL - YOU FUCKED UP. Don't let the door hit 'ya where the Good Lord split 'ya.

Just my 10-cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. I knew Rahm Emanuel wasn't very good. But I had no idea that he did such a *horrible* job.
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 07:09 AM by w4rma
And this guy wants the House Majority Leader position (Pelosi's old position when she is elevated to Speaker). I do *not* support him for that.

This guy, that Emanuel chose could switch parties at any moment and will most likely vote and campaign against Democrats at every opportunity. This guy, from this description, appears to be a total waste of Democratic resources and Emanuel shoveled DCCC resources hand over fist into his race:

Emanuel had been too preoccupied to notice Kissell, Howie Klein complains: He already had a darling North Carolina candidate: Heath Shuler (who also won his election last night). But Shuler "won't even commit to voting for Pelosi," Klein groused. He "probably tossed a coin to decide if he was going to run as a Republican in Tennessee or a Democratic in North Carolina."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. If Emmanuel had invested even just a litte $$ into Seals he would've won...
I strongly disagree that Emmanuel lost the Seals race because Seals was milquetoast.

I heard Seals on AAR several times and Emmanuel was putting SOO much $$ into Tammy Duckworth's campaign that Seals got nothing. Why does this matter? In polls days before the election, among people who had heard of Dan Seals he was leading BIG -- the only problem was that less than 50% of the voters had heard of him. All this man needed was support. I donated and I have no regrets.

Seals on the issues:

Iraq: "I believe our best approach is a responsible withdrawal from Iraq. A withdrawal must be accompanied by clear, measurable goals that enable our troops to leave as soon as possible. Our troops deserve nothing less."

Terrorism Detainee Bill: "This "compromise" legislation was developed under White House pressure to respond to the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld -- which ruled that the current military commissions at Guantanamo are in violation of the Military Code of Justice as well as the Geneva Conventions.

I would NOT have voted for this bill.

Essentially, the bill lets the President detain suspected terrorists at CIA prisons and try them at special military tribunals. It also allows the President to define "torture," and to "interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions."

The new law also retroactively protects the CIA and White House from prosecution of offenses under the War Crimes Act.

I agree with U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy on this, who said during the debate: "We are losing our moral compass."

Health Care: "For me, this is a moral issue - it is unconscionable that the world's richest nation allows so many people to go without health insurance."

Immigration Reform: "The main goal of my immigration policy is to attract the most productive individuals to our country while repelling those who would work against us or our values"

Stem Cell Research: "Embryonic stem cells are the key to regenerative medicine, which scientists agree is the foundation of better health care in the future."

Education: "Education is about national priorities. If we believe in education, we need to invest in it."

http://www.dansealsforcongress.com/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
27. Umm... we won
Major props to Rahm, Chuck Schumer and Howard Dean.


We can't wait 72 hours after a historic victory to start eating our own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AusTexDem Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
28. I first heard Chris Matthews put this foreword on Tue Night
He said that people were not voting for Liberals they were voting for Conservative Democrats. That was his explanation for the wave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
29. Amen. Just because conservative Dems are able to get elected in
red states doesn't mean they should set the agenda for the whole party. They deserve a place at the table and are valuable members of the majority, but must not be seen as a prescription for the whole.

That's a trick used by the rightwing to shift the field rightward (corporate-ward).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
30. I didn't know who he was until the dems won the house and they
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 08:09 AM by Chimichurri
plastered his face all over the cable news networks praising him. He didn't even look happy and KO or maybe Chris mentioned his unhappy face.

The only thing I could think about was Dean being lambasted by the DLCers for "wasting" money across the U.S. and how vindicated his strategy became.

This sums him up perfectly:
"Rahm Emanuel did everything he could to lose the House. His recruiting and use of money was strategically unwise, and he was bailed out by a national trend that brought us the Senate, the Governorships, state legislative chambers, and state constitutional officers all over the country....
Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), nearly tripped over himself on the way to the microphone to claim the credit."

He's become obsolete and irrelevant. He should be treated as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
31. Now this is what we needed to know!!! (and suspected all along)
We need to shove this in their faces anytime we hear crap about "controlling the agenda"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
32. Hot Damn!
I was ranting on this subject Tuesday night! The second it started it was transparent as hell.

Conservative Dems.
Moderate Dems.
nd they only won because the repubs had gone soo far to the right.

bullsh*t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
34. Carolyn Shea Porter NH CD-1
She was abandoned and shunned by Emanuel's DCCC after she beat the corporate annointed creep in the primary. They wrote off her campaign. Carolyn is a great progressive Democrat and she won despite having the rug pulled out from under her.

"While the DCCC rarely takes sides in a primary fight, the committee last March contributed $5,000 to Shea-Porter's primary opponent, Jim Craig . Moreover, the committee chairman, Representative Rahm Emanuel of Illinois , was so confident that Craig would win the primary that he steered another $7,000 to Craig for use in the general election.
But after Shea-Porter beat Craig in an upset, the committee did not follow through with a donation to her campaign.

``I would say if wants to run ads, that would be a wonderful thing," Shea-Porter said. ``The media part is obviously the most expensive part of it."
<...>

A decision by the committee to extend its funding to new races could be make or break for candidates such as Shea-Porter. As of the end of September, she had $49,000 on hand, compared with $538,000 for Bradley. The committee is allowed to provide a maximum of $79,200 in expenditures coordinated with a campaign."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/10/19/63146/156

This is the work of our great leader of the DCCC and New Democrat DLC creep Emanuel. I'm willing to work with the corporate creep wing of the party, but we all need to be aware that they are not to be trusted.

It was the grass roots that won this election, the grass roots and the people of this nation who were finally fed up with Republican malfeasance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. Kinda makes one wonder if the DLC is really a repuke front
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
37. locking
This is flamebait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC