Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:03 PM
Original message |
DEMOCRATIC VOTERS will decide if Hillary is nominated, not Dean, DLC or Carville |
|
Got a problem with that?
I predict Hillary will meet the same fate as Dean in early primaries. Whatever happens, it will be DEMOCRATIC VOTERS who decide.
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
3. As long as the votes are on paper and the count is transparent |
|
Hill can take her chances with all the rest
|
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
fooj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
5. You know what? You are spot on. |
|
Dean gives ALL of the credit to the American people. At least he has it right. WE have spoken. WE will vote in who WE want. Period.
|
tularetom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
6. You know what I like about Hillary? Wingnuts hate her. |
|
You know what I dislike about her? Practically everything else.
|
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
The wingnuts will find a reason to hate whomever we choose.
|
The Count
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Exactly! They may annoint a designated loser in the primaries, heaping praise |
|
but the moment the genera; election start, ANY CANDIDATE (even Lieberman) would become Satan to them. And the media too.
|
The Count
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message |
8. True in principle, but primaries are already rigged by media et al etc |
|
Disparate coverage - where only Hillary & Obama are mentioned and say, never Clark - is not really giving the voters a fair shot to evaluate ALL their choices. I'd be really happy if Hillary replaced Reid. A lot of other people probably would too.
|
lcordero2
(832 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The PNAC wing of the Democratic Party can go F**K ITSELF.
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-10-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Well, right now Democratic voters have her as their #1 choice w/Obama 2nd |
|
But I think by the time the primaries roll around, Obama will gain serious ground, just as he's been doing all along, and then maybe Hillary will shock everyone by not running for president. Not that I don't think she'd make an excellent president is she were to win, but I think Obama will have a better chance of winning once he gets more of the limelight. Too bad that mainstream American Democrats don't think more highly of General Clark for their pick in the primaries. I can't understand that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message |