Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Nobody likes Democrats because they say such stupid things.."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:50 PM
Original message
"Nobody likes Democrats because they say such stupid things.."
Says Tucker Carlson regarding the assertion that "Nancy Pelosi's win is a victory for women everywhere."

He actually said, "You know, I think that's why nobody likes Democrats, because they say stupid things like that."

Hey asshole - we won!!! GET OVER IT!

God I think I hate that little fucker almost as much as I hate Sean Hannity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. But wait, that itself was a stupid thing. Is this a trick? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Guess he tripped over this one, much like
his Dancing with the Stars appearance, ("one...two...three four...ooops!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He is kind of an expert on stupid things... - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I actually thought he was going to start crying or something...
he seemed bloated, flushed and bordering on losing control of his bowels.

He was obviously very angry. Which makes me very happy. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow. I'd hate to see what kind of elections we could win if people DID like us! nt
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 06:52 PM by impeachdubya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's his first problem, he "thinks".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. No, Blue State Native
the opposite is true. He does NOT think.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Of course that is what I meant.
:hi: Hence the quotation marks. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. oh, yeah, there are quotation marks...
but I was just messin' with you. I know you know the little monkey doesn't "think". You're a DUer, after all. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. !!
:toast: :hi: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nobody likes Republicans either
Cause they're a bunch of right-wing, fundamentalist corporate whores.

BURN!
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's right, though. It's not a victory for Ann Coulter, Phylis Schlafly, or Dr. Laura.
Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. nobody likes Tucker
'cause he opens up the pie-hole, atop his idiotic bow tie, and spews out divisive and ignorant nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He wears big boy ties now.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. He may wear big boy ties now, but he still sucks his thumb. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. !!
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. And little girl panties....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. !!
:yoiks: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nobody? Is he unaware of Tuesday's results?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. It was the "nobody" part that got me.
I wanted to grab him by his little preppy-dork bow tie and scream "So how did we win back the House AND the Senate, whiny boy???"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wrong! Nobody likes Tucker Carlson because he says such stupid things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. dupe
Edited on Fri Nov-10-06 07:10 PM by EstimatedProphet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. It is a victory for women, and I'm a guy...
I think it is cool that this bigoted nation is finally starting hold up its end of the bargain with women. Slight more than 1/2 of the country is female, yet we have never had a woman President. THAT SUCKS!

We need to be fair in America and get over this shit already, this is 21st Century, we should already have had a number of women Presidents by now! (To say nothing of the least, women Speakers of the House.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boolean Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck him.
If I had a penny for every idiotic thing a puke said, I'd be able to buy my own planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. And calling any one who opposes you
a traitor and making fun of someone like Micheal J Fox are things that endear the country. I think the people said NO to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yep, Just look at those ignoramuses: Clintons; Cuomos; Carter; Kerry;
Barney F.; etc. Dummies 'R' Us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. "Nobody, somebody, unnamed sources, people" OkayTuck..NAMES please
This is the nonsense that needs to be attacked..

Glittering generalities

Glittering generalities "was one of the seven main propaganda techniques identified by the Institute for Propaganda Analysis in 1938. It also occurs very often in politics and political propaganda. Glittering generalities are words that have different positive meaning for individual subjects, but are linked to highly valued concepts. When these words are used, they demand approval without thinking, simply because such an important concept is involved. For example, when a person is asked to do something in 'defense of democracy' they are more likely to agree. The concept of democracy has a positive connotation to them because it is linked to a concept that they value. Words often used as glittering generalities are honor, glory, love of country, and especially in the United States, freedom. When coming across with glittering generalities, we should especially consider the merits of the idea itself when separated from specific words." --ThinkQuest Library.

* "Use attractive, but vague words that make speeches and other communications sound good, but in practice say nothing in particular.

* "Use linguistic patterns such as alliteration, metaphor and reversals that turn your words into poetry that flows and rhymes in hypnotic patterns.

* "Use words that appeal to values, which often themselves are related to triggering of powerful emotions.

* "A common element of glittering generalities are intangible nouns that embody ideals, such as dignity, freedom, fame, integrity, justice, love and respect." <1>

Examples

"'Freedom' and 'Democracy' are notable examples of glittering generalities: vague terms with high moral connotations intended to arouse faith and respect in listeners or readers. The exact meanings of these glittering terms are impossible to define, hence vague generalities. 'We the people' could mean prudent, wise, fair rule; it could also mean repression. It all depends on who the 'people' who rule actually are. Furthermore, one person's idea of freedom could very well be another's idea of slavery. Glittering generalities sound sincere but they really mean nothing. As such they are a logical fallacy. Used by people who sincerely mean well, and also by people who seek to muzzle freedoms and democratic government, whatever these terms may mean." --Unattributed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bandwagon

"You're either with us, or against us" appeals to an audience to join a ground swell of public opinion and activity because everybody else is joining. The "bandwagon" technique appeals to feelings of loyalty and nationalism, as well as the desire to be on the winning side. The technique tends to obscure the ethics of the activity at the expense of victory: better to belong to the winning side than be too concerned with the rightness of the means to achieve it.

The "4 out of 5 doctors recommend..." slogan uses both the bandwagon technique and the argument to authority to promote an action. (The two techniques are commonly found linked.) In psychographics terminology, the bandwagon technique appeals most strongly to the group called belongers, those who make decisions because that's what everyone else is doing.

In the post-9/11 world, public figures in the U.S. find it difficult to express even mild criticism of the Bush administration's foreign policies -- so powerful is the bandwagon mentality that seeks to assert that everyone must unite in the fight against terrorism, the axis of evil, the makers of weapons of mass destruction, and those against freedom.

Obscured in this powerful propaganda technique are the facts that, for example, the U.S. has more weapons of mass destruction than any other nation, and is the world's largest arms dealer.

As the "world's most powerful nation," the U.S. has tremendous bandwagon appeal. Factors relevant to the bandwagon technique may be the fear of losing or the threat of reprisals.
......................................................
pure propaganda techniques.............

We have to challenge and call them out when the people with the airtime try to get away with this shit..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC