walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:06 PM
Original message |
So thats what they mean by "bi-partisanship" |
|
Coulter, Hannity, Malkin, O'Reilly, already these heads are gearing up for the "bi-partisan" war. They are each discussing how Bush is handing "olive branches of bi-partisanship" to the Democrats :eyes: and how the evil libruls are going to do their best to "make a bonfire" out of all the branches. I guess they figure that after all they've done for the dems, after all the nice things they said, after all the honest rhetoric they have delivered, after all the bi-partisanship the Republicans have exhibited they are owed something. I'm positive that if the shoe was on the other foot they would... what? They were? In 94'? Contract with America? Newt who? Well what did they do with all their new found power? Oh.. THEY IMPEACHED CLINTON! Oh so thats what they call bi-partisanship! Well then I for one am happy to join in the bi-partisanship spirit that the Republicans so deftly displayed during the 90's. :evilgrin:
|
POAS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. "Coulter, Hannity, Malkin, O'Reilly" ---wow |
|
talk about an axis of evil!
Hey wait, you left off Limpballs
|
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. They're so "post 911." |
NastyRiffraff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. They're post 11/7! n/t |
warrens
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
No one watches Fox anymore, and those cretins don't get invited onto sane news channels anymore either.
|
filer
(444 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm for bi-partisan investigations. |
|
The Pubs are welcome to join in.
|
SharonAnn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. For that, I prefer the term "non-partisan" since the party should be irrelevant for this. |
filer
(444 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
SharonAnn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Just use Hastert's rules in the House and Frist's rules in the Senate |
|
Wouldn't that be "bi-partisan"?
|
Faygo Kid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-13-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
9. They are foaming at the mouth. Rove's commands have gone forth. |
|
I heard only a little of Hannity today, on the way back from the airport. He doesn't get it; the American people want out of Iraq, and he is still yelling for "victory," whatever that is now. Frankly, it's a Chickenhawk fest - Hannity et al all ready to have somebody else's loved one killed for this insanity, as always, and screw him. Bring 'em home, so Hannity can support cheap pols who cut VA benefits. I would rather fight on that turf.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |