Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Take another crack at that cocaine law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 05:19 PM
Original message
Take another crack at that cocaine law

By Eric E. Sterling, ERIC E. STERLING, president of the nonprofit Criminal Justice Policy Foundation in Silver Spring, Md., was counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, principally responsible for anti-drug legislation,
November 13, 2006

ONE OF OUR MOST infamous contemporary laws is the 100-1 difference in sentencing between crack cocaine and powder cocaine. Under federal drug laws, prison sentences are usually tied to the quantity of drugs the defendant trafficked. For example, selling 5,000 grams of powder cocaine (about a briefcase full) gets a mandatory 10-year prison sentence, but so does selling only 50 grams of crack cocaine (the weight of a candy bar).

Working for the House Judiciary Committee in 1986, I wrote the House bill that was the basis for that law. We made some terrible mistakes.

Those mistakes, aggravated by the Justice Department's misuse of the penalties, have been a disaster. Conventional wisdom is that the 100-1 ratio needs to be repealed. But that's an inadequate fix.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Sentencing Commission — the independent agency that gives sentencing guidelines to federal judges and advises Congress — will hold hearings on this issue. If logic prevails, in the next Congress we may finally see an end to one of the most unjust laws passed in recent memory. And that might correct the biggest mistake of my professional life.

more: http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-sterling13nov13,0,3353997.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nozebro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. The MOST "terrible" mistake was criminalizing what we ingest.

If Mr. Sterling was as interested in justice as in making himself look better, he'd advocate legalizing natural drugs and taking a closer look at those UNnatural ones that have so many adverse and side effects that it takes up a whole page of 4 pt. type to list them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i so totally agree
the "drug war" bandwagon was pure grandstanding.

makes you wonder... if an administration came up with a self-righteous slogan RE legalizing natural drugs, if the whole political landscape wouldn't fall over itself to make it happen. it's HERD behavior, not leadership.

we need some "working dog" democrats to tend the cattle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Man, at least they are looking at it now.
At least there is a crack in the dam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. it is a travesty - particularly since
the irony is that 5,000 grams of pure powdered cocaine would make roughly 8 - 9,000 grams of crack depending on the original purity and other factors.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC