|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:05 PM Original message |
Impeachment is about Democratic balls as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. How is engaging massive resources in futility leadership? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
partylessinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we got an ass kicking Speaker and it was NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. I want Conyers not Pelosi. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. Agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. No. The Republicans would have done better than under 50% if they hadn't impeached Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Of course * is criminal, but Pelosi is smart and doesn't need your sexist slur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Metaphorically it is not a slur n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. It's just like saying "that's awfully white of you!" to a black person. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Deleted message |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. When you wrote "balls", it implies only men have the courage. Drop the sexist term, please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Deleted message |
MuseRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. That comment was sensitive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Racists said "Mighty white of you" was "just an expression". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. What if I said "Barbara Boxer has balls"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. No, you're suggesting being female is not enough to have moral strength. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. No I'm not, she has more courage than most male senators n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. You don't need 'balls' to have moral courage. It's insulting to assume otherwise. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. I'm not always sure where the sexist line is, but you crossed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nofurylike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. self-delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Pelosi doesn't need 'balls' to be tough. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 07:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. True, certainly. But she does need to put IMPEACHMENT back on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canetoad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
14. You seem to believe that balls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. Ah yes. Balls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 12:32 AM Response to Reply #17 |
38. I am so tired of the inference that male body parts are required for courage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
21. Kick for balls, not in them. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
22. DAMN STRAIGHT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. LOL!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. It's an INSULT to assume women don't have what it takes for moral fortitude. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boolean (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:13 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. It's an expression that means moral fortitude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MuseRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Then why use genitalia? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. And saying "that's awfully white of you" to blacks also was a compliment. But it's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelly Rupert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. It's still a terrible way to rule a government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
novalib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
26. BACKBONE!!!! NOT "BALLS"!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nofurylike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
32. sexist. i know, you could give a shit. still, i have to support those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nofurylike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
33. thank you, all who tried to raise consciousness on the sexism. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 11:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Malkin, the theocon, also tried to use "balls" as a term of guts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nofurylike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-14-06 04:25 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. that says it all, Erika! sad! DUers allied with "theocon" malkin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. If the voters cared about character in 2004, W shouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-13-06 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
37. Backbone to impeach AFTER we save lives! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC