1976 was the last year neither a Bush nor a Clinton was on the Presidental Ticket

[ECH1969]

Will 2008 continue the trend?

[Greeby]

1. I'll go one step further

It was the last time a Bush or Clinton wasn't President, period

[Dawgs]

6. Uh, Bush "the first" wasn't President until 88'.

;-)

[ECH1969]

7. The poster was saying that he/she thinks Bush was calling the shots in the 80s not Reagan

[Benhurst]

8. Bush was de facto president once James Baker became Reagan's

Chief of Staff in 1981.

Years ago I heard the Reagan Library's historian say he thought Reagan's Alzheimer's manifested itself within weeks after the Gipper was shot.

[H2O Man]

9. True. n/t

[ProdigalJunkMail]

2. it will continue...

Hil'08 is on the fast track...

sP

[lostnotforgotten]

3. Will Not Vote For Hillary - Bush Iraq War Enabler

I do not support war mongers.

Never have and never will!

[izzie]

4. Sometimes I think we are as bad a Victoria and all her children

and grandchildren all over ruling Europe. The good genes do seem to get filled out over the years for some odd reason.

[BlueEyedSon]

5. Hil's campaign should be illegal (and Jr's) - NO MORE DYNASTIC PRESIDENCIES

[KG]

10. jeb v. hil in '08?

:eyes:

[lapfog_1]

11. No reason to break up a good royalty

let's get Ted to run. Ok, I'm joking... but,

I sure remember all the complaining and whining when Bobby ran, and then Ted's very abortive attempt.
People were complaining that we fought a war to stop this kind of thing, father to son, brother to brother, and so on. But here we are again, with TWO families with dynastic aspirations. And strangely, few call out "fresh blood, no more Bush/Clinton". I wonder why that is?

[wisteria]

12. I don't think it has been that long, but I hope it ends before 2008.

Enough is enough.