In '00 and '06, Lieberman's challenger received 448,077 votes.

PsychoDad

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:38 AM
Original message

In '00 and '06, Lieberman's challenger received 448,077 votes.

exactly 448,007 votes each time.

http://thepeskyfly.blogspot.com/2006/11/moment-of-zen-yogi.html

In 2000, Joe Lieberman's Republican challenger received 448,077 votes.
In 2006, Joe Lieberman's Democratic challenger received 448,077 votes.

Wow....
How's that for a coincidence?

Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Botany

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:40 AM
Response to Original message

1. Nothing to see here .... move on .... Nothing to see here

So the odds are 1 in billion but the real ? is why do you hate America?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

KingFlorez

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:41 AM
Response to Original message

2. Here it comes

Lamont lost, so Lieberman must have cheated :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Hav

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message

3. .

Seriously people, we've already dealt with this issue. It's not a coincidence, it's just that someone made a mistake so that Lamont is shown with the wrong vote count. Lamont actually got more than 480000 votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LynzM

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message

4. Not true.

If you check the state tallies, the results are different. The issue is explained here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2962088

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

PsychoDad

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #4

6. Ah, I see...

Thanks for the link. :hi:

Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LynzM

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6

9. You're welcome!!

If it were true, it'd definitely be worth looking into!

Peace back at ya, dude! :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

LTR

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message

5. Malloy mentioned this last week

Then a listener called in to correct him, saying it was a reporting error, then gave the correct figure.

I believe this was debunked here at DU, but I don't know where the thread is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

PsychoDad

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message

7. My bad...

I'm a week behind it seems :silly:

Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

goclark

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Nov-14-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message

8. My tin hat is not

off!

The scum Joey would do anything to win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.