Are the Freepers freaking out about a possible Olbermann mention tonight?

[bbernardini]

Or are they of the "no publicity is bad publicity" mind?

[tridim]

1. Domestic terra trumps "Any publicity is good publicity"

Just look at BushCo.

[LSparkle]

2. There you go -- BINGO!

Bunch of nutjobs!

[PCIntern]

3. there it was...

KO'd...

[proud patriot]

4. ummm, they probably are now

:think:

[stanwyck]

5. "Costonzo" idolizes Coulter, Malkin, and

Ingraham and "wants to live up to their standards". He was "an acolyte" of theirs and they clearly "enjoy having acolytes." Malkin published the names and addresses of students who demonstrated against recruiters on their campus. And then claimed innocence when the students were harassed.
Coulter is a professional agitator who says outrageous things. She's called for the execution of the American kid who was fighting on the side of Al Queda as a "message to liberals".
This is what John Cook is saying on Olberman. (senior writer for Radar Online, I think).
Both Cook and Olberman have been clear to say the actions of "an acolyte" can not be blamed on the people who inspire them.
But, personally, I believe the hate talkers need to do some soul searching. Do they really want to promote harassment, or worse, of other Americans? Is this "godly", Ann?
There are consequences for your actions, and your words.
It's time for those on the right who have decency and standards to call these flame-throwers out. Or run the risk of becoming synonymous with the divisive views of people who wish other people harm.