Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems to question Abizaid on violence in Iraq and what it means for the 152,000 U.S. troops there

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:12 PM
Original message
Dems to question Abizaid on violence in Iraq and what it means for the 152,000 U.S. troops there
Wednesday, November 15, 2006; Page A06

U.S. Commander in Iraq to Face Democrats Eager for Troop Cuts

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/14/AR2006111401246_pf.html

{snip}

Army Gen. John P. Abizaid, head of the U.S. Central Command, which oversees American forces in the Middle East, will face questions on the violence in Iraq and what it means for the roughly 145,000 U.S. troops there during scheduled testimony today before the Senate Armed Services Committee, senators from both parties said.

Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.), poised to take over as Armed Services Committee chairman, said that Iraq is headed into an abyss of civil war and that only by beginning a troop pullout in four to six months can Washington exert the necessary pressure on Iraqi leaders to forge political solutions to the country's violence.

What Iraqis "need to hear, and what the American people need to hear, is that we are darned impatient," Levin said at a news conference Monday, recounting a conversation with President Bush.

Levin said he believes a majority of the Senate would now back a bipartisan resolution he initiated on a phased pullout.

Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), a committee member who joined with 40 other senators in backing the resolution six months ago, said in an interview: "The best approach is to clearly state the policy to begin redeployment The critical problems . . . are political in nature," not military, he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/14/AR2006111401246_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great news!
I hope it's in a real room this time and that he's sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC