AdvancedProgress
(203 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 03:23 PM
Original message |
Question about church influence during the election... |
|
I understand that if a preacher tells his congregation who to vote for that the IRS is capable of yanking the church's tax-exempt status.
During the election, Tennessee's proposition #1 was to change the state's constituion to define marriage as between a man and a woman. Which, of course, passed by overwhelming majority.
Prior to the election I saw a church sign that said something as blatant as "Vote Yes on Prop #1". Does this threaten that church's tax-exempt status?
|
RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message |
AdvancedProgress
(203 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Where's the logic in that?
:wtf:
|
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This person went to a church in Minnesota and the preacher told his 'SUBJECTS' to vote for her. He held a political rally. Very very illegal. But IRS has not even started to investigate. This is the republican way tho...the churchs get to campaign for the republicans and still get tax free status.
|
Sammy Pepys
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Don't know the law specifically, but tax exemptions usually seem to start being questioned when a church starts spending money or endorsing specific candidates or getting extremely political. I don't know if this gets it that far.
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I think the test is "partisanship" not issue advocacy. |
|
Churches can advocate issues; cannot advocate candidates or parties.
|
AdvancedProgress
(203 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 03:54 PM by AdvancedProgress
But I suppose I can see the difference. Not that I agree with it though.
|
Igel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-17-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Propositions aren't people and don't belong to parties. |
|
They're issues. Churches--or any other NGO--can take a stand on an issue. Small-p politics.
What they cannot do is say, "Vote for Pettibottom Hornstrangler (Q) for County Judge." That is big-P politics, clearly partisan (although I wonder what would happen if the race was non-partisan, i.e., no political parties involved per se?).
The church I was in would rail against specific politicians; but one doctrine was also 'don't vote', so had the IRS come they might have gotten the ministers on a technicality, but the entire 'don't vote' takes the sting out of the vituperation.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 03:42 AM
Response to Original message |