Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My take: It was a power play between Reid & Kerry/Kennedy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:24 PM
Original message
My take: It was a power play between Reid & Kerry/Kennedy
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM by Jersey Devil
Harry was clearly against a filibuster as recently as the middle of last week. Then Kerry/Kennedy tried to get it going and his message to them was: I am the leader and you may not bypass me. Thus, I am hanging you out to dry - and then Reid let everyone know it.

There is no other way, imo, that a minority leader in the Senate could have mustered less support unless he was the most incompetent to have ever held the office. Either way, we lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dave Sund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. And, in doing so, made himself look even weaker
He better come with it tomorrow night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. In that case, he only compromised his own position by opposing cloture
If Reid REALLY wanted to screw them over like that, why would he support their filibuster? He could have painted Kerry & Kennedy as rogue mavericks, but instead he just made himself look weak and ineffective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. He had to oppose it as the minority leader
That doesn't mean he was really for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Reid could have abstained
No, I don't think there's any grand plan at work here.

Reid is weak, and many of the Democratic senators are compromised beyond reclamation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trevelyan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think you are right. So... what should we say to Reid and what can we
do to get a different Minority LEADER?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. My take? We got screwed again.
That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. K and K had over half the dems on board. That counts for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. And they had Durbin in their camp
Dont forget the media said that Durbin was strongly for the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, I didn't see that at all. However, we lost ~nay, the nation lost ~
SPECTACULARLY!

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Or maybe it's about Ted Kennedy style Democrats vs Bill Clinton style Dems
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 07:38 PM by blm
Kennedy will compromise on some things only after putting up a fierce fight and possibly gaining some little things along the way. Clinton would prefer compromising on many things without tha rancor to gain SOME thing, no matter how little it is.

The only reason it is like this for either of them is because the GOP spent the last twenty years gaining near total control of the media. so they get to define pretty much EVERYTHING about the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. We do need our own media echo chamber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. There does seem to be an ego thing going in there
Where Reid will oppose someone if he perceives a challenge to his leadership. He appears to want everything to go to his game plan, his chess match. When someone wants to fight for an issue that doesn't go with his plan, he sort of slaps them down.

Early on, we'd hear about how Kerry wanted to fight harder, and Reid was angry with him for trying to take a leadership position when he's not the Minority Leader. Plenty of folks sided with Reid, and wanted Kerry to stop acting like he had something to prove, or like he was running for 2008 or whatever.

We've heard from Reid's staffers and Clinton's staffers how they're almost laughing at Kerry like he's some sort of doofus. How dare HE try to overshadow their respective bosses!

And someone here once said that they felt like there was a Kerry-Kennedy-Boxer wing of the party, and that Reid was not comfortable with them.

That said, I do like the way Reid fights on some issues.

The factionalism gets me down. You'd think we could hang together once in a blue moon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. That's exactly how I see it
And why I think Reid needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Harry Reid HAS TO GO! I know than many DU'ers love the guy because
he seems so much better than Daschle who gave away the "Dem Party" when we had a MAJORITY...but he, like Pelosi are "weak and ineffectual voices for those of us who DEMAND CHANGE.

Status quo with bouts of "activism under pressure" is Reid and Pelosi's mantra. And they always come across as a little clueless and disorganized compared to the Repug MACHINE which will NOT GO AWAY with DeLay and Abramoff's piccadillos. They have recruited THOUSAND OF YOUNG REPUGS TRAINED BY THEM ..who are OUT THERE WORKING IN THE BACKGROUND~

We have nothing but "feckless, toadies" on our side who whine "they just didn't see it coming." :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent Smith Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think he was against it today
I think that he reluctantly voted for it today and did nothing behind the scenes to advance it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. OR reid didnt believe in the filibuster move. kerry believed in the
filibuster move. so even though reid didnt believe in it, he let kerry and kennedy take it and he supported them with a filibuster vote, even though he didnt believe in it.

and that is the end of the story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. i swear this shit is like whiplash
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 08:05 PM by Faye
months ago everyone was praising Reid for shutting down the Senate over the Iraq war investigation.

now this.

i'm not blaming anyone, just sayng....that's what i mean with the Dems, they are so all over the spectrum it's hard to know wtf they stand for :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I think you are confusing emotional reactions with principles.
Especially on a board as large as this there are emotional reactions that blow with events.

Political principles aren't reactive they are directive. Unfortunately the Dems BIG TENT strategy has the members and the pros stretched over a very broad range of general views. If you listen to the same people over and over you will come to see their views as generally stable. BUT when you listen to different dems on different days you get all the viewpoints from all over.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Yeah that was great but meanwhile
Where's the fucking report? Where's the outrage over the spying? Where's the supreme court? It was one moment of being brave. We need day after day after day after day of it just to have a chance against these fascists. Not enough. Reid apparently knows how bad this administration is and can state it plainly. But that little Roe. V. Wade thing-was that it? He's against Alito-kinda. I will never trust a half Dem. And if you are anti-choice in the end you are half Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. playing both ends against the middle
with "playing" being the operative word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Red State Blue Dogs
I honestly don't know when it will be any clearer. I don't say that to bash them, but to identify where we need to target our efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. United we stand, divided we fall...and fall and fall and fall...
It's as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. I Think People Here are Trying to Split Our Party (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC