Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:24 PM
Original message |
My take: It was a power play between Reid & Kerry/Kennedy |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM by Jersey Devil
Harry was clearly against a filibuster as recently as the middle of last week. Then Kerry/Kennedy tried to get it going and his message to them was: I am the leader and you may not bypass me. Thus, I am hanging you out to dry - and then Reid let everyone know it.
There is no other way, imo, that a minority leader in the Senate could have mustered less support unless he was the most incompetent to have ever held the office. Either way, we lose.
|
Dave Sund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. And, in doing so, made himself look even weaker |
|
He better come with it tomorrow night.
|
0rganism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. In that case, he only compromised his own position by opposing cloture |
|
If Reid REALLY wanted to screw them over like that, why would he support their filibuster? He could have painted Kerry & Kennedy as rogue mavericks, but instead he just made himself look weak and ineffective.
|
Jersey Devil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. He had to oppose it as the minority leader |
|
That doesn't mean he was really for it.
|
0rganism
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Reid could have abstained |
|
No, I don't think there's any grand plan at work here.
Reid is weak, and many of the Democratic senators are compromised beyond reclamation.
|
Trevelyan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I think you are right. So... what should we say to Reid and what can we |
|
do to get a different Minority LEADER?
|
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. My take? We got screwed again. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
6. K and K had over half the dems on board. That counts for something. |
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. And they had Durbin in their camp |
|
Dont forget the media said that Durbin was strongly for the filibuster.
|
Mind_your_head
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
7. No, I didn't see that at all. However, we lost ~nay, the nation lost ~ |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Or maybe it's about Ted Kennedy style Democrats vs Bill Clinton style Dems |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 07:38 PM by blm
Kennedy will compromise on some things only after putting up a fierce fight and possibly gaining some little things along the way. Clinton would prefer compromising on many things without tha rancor to gain SOME thing, no matter how little it is.
The only reason it is like this for either of them is because the GOP spent the last twenty years gaining near total control of the media. so they get to define pretty much EVERYTHING about the Democrats.
|
AX10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. We do need our own media echo chamber. |
LittleClarkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
11. There does seem to be an ego thing going in there |
|
Where Reid will oppose someone if he perceives a challenge to his leadership. He appears to want everything to go to his game plan, his chess match. When someone wants to fight for an issue that doesn't go with his plan, he sort of slaps them down.
Early on, we'd hear about how Kerry wanted to fight harder, and Reid was angry with him for trying to take a leadership position when he's not the Minority Leader. Plenty of folks sided with Reid, and wanted Kerry to stop acting like he had something to prove, or like he was running for 2008 or whatever.
We've heard from Reid's staffers and Clinton's staffers how they're almost laughing at Kerry like he's some sort of doofus. How dare HE try to overshadow their respective bosses!
And someone here once said that they felt like there was a Kerry-Kennedy-Boxer wing of the party, and that Reid was not comfortable with them.
That said, I do like the way Reid fights on some issues.
The factionalism gets me down. You'd think we could hang together once in a blue moon.
|
WildEyedLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
12. That's exactly how I see it |
|
And why I think Reid needs to go.
|
KoKo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Harry Reid HAS TO GO! I know than many DU'ers love the guy because |
|
he seems so much better than Daschle who gave away the "Dem Party" when we had a MAJORITY...but he, like Pelosi are "weak and ineffectual voices for those of us who DEMAND CHANGE.
Status quo with bouts of "activism under pressure" is Reid and Pelosi's mantra. And they always come across as a little clueless and disorganized compared to the Repug MACHINE which will NOT GO AWAY with DeLay and Abramoff's piccadillos. They have recruited THOUSAND OF YOUNG REPUGS TRAINED BY THEM ..who are OUT THERE WORKING IN THE BACKGROUND~
We have nothing but "feckless, toadies" on our side who whine "they just didn't see it coming." :-(
|
Innocent Smith
(466 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I think he was against it today |
|
I think that he reluctantly voted for it today and did nothing behind the scenes to advance it.
|
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
16. OR reid didnt believe in the filibuster move. kerry believed in the |
|
filibuster move. so even though reid didnt believe in it, he let kerry and kennedy take it and he supported them with a filibuster vote, even though he didnt believe in it.
and that is the end of the story
|
New Earth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
17. i swear this shit is like whiplash |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-30-06 08:05 PM by Faye
months ago everyone was praising Reid for shutting down the Senate over the Iraq war investigation.
now this.
i'm not blaming anyone, just sayng....that's what i mean with the Dems, they are so all over the spectrum it's hard to know wtf they stand for :shrug:
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. I think you are confusing emotional reactions with principles. |
|
Especially on a board as large as this there are emotional reactions that blow with events.
Political principles aren't reactive they are directive. Unfortunately the Dems BIG TENT strategy has the members and the pros stretched over a very broad range of general views. If you listen to the same people over and over you will come to see their views as generally stable. BUT when you listen to different dems on different days you get all the viewpoints from all over.
|
Generator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. Yeah that was great but meanwhile |
|
Where's the fucking report? Where's the outrage over the spying? Where's the supreme court? It was one moment of being brave. We need day after day after day after day of it just to have a chance against these fascists. Not enough. Reid apparently knows how bad this administration is and can state it plainly. But that little Roe. V. Wade thing-was that it? He's against Alito-kinda. I will never trust a half Dem. And if you are anti-choice in the end you are half Dem.
|
GreenArrow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message |
18. playing both ends against the middle |
|
with "playing" being the operative word.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I honestly don't know when it will be any clearer. I don't say that to bash them, but to identify where we need to target our efforts.
|
ourbluenation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
21. United we stand, divided we fall...and fall and fall and fall... |
stepnw1f
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-30-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |
22. I Think People Here are Trying to Split Our Party (nt) |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |