Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman voted with GOP for Alito. Would you like to get rid of him?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:14 PM
Original message
Lieberman voted with GOP for Alito. Would you like to get rid of him?
You've probably heard the buzz about Ned Lamont challenging Joe Lieberman in the Democratic primary this year.

Ned is considering running because, like most Connecticut Democrats, he is tired of being represented by a senator who is not willing to stand up to the President on the war — and on the rest of his extreme right wing agenda which is so harmful to our country.

Ned Lamont is a successful businessman who understands the importance of health care and education to our economy. He will fight for universal health care and to bring all of America's schools into the 21st Century. He believes the federal government should stay out of people's private lives and stop spying on its own citizens. He would push for energy conservation and bio fuels as better alternatives than the liquefied natural gas plant in Long Island Sound. And he would demand that corrupt public officials be held accountable for their actions.

The polls show that Democrats are ready for a change, but the entrenched interests behind Joe Lieberman are going to fight tooth and nail and pour millions of dollars into this race. To win, we'll need volunteers working hard in every city and town — and we'll need thousands more Americans pledging to contribute financially as well.

What's the next step? Ned has stated that he will not move beyond the exploratory phase of a campaign until at least 1,000 people in Connecticut have signed up to volunteer. So no matter where you live, this is a chance to make history. Please sign up today!

http://www.nedlamont.com/

It's Not Shaping Up To Be A Party For Lieberman

January 22, 2006

Greenwich millionaire Ned Lamont is strongly considering a challenge against Lieberman for the Democratic nomination to the Senate. Lamont, whose active interest in politics has been limited to developing a dead-on JFK imitation, a run for the state Senate in 1990, service on the state's pension advisory board, raising money for Bill Clinton and working with the liberal think tank the Brookings Institution on budget issues, may have found his unlikely moment.

At 52, Lamont is tan, fit and possessed of an easy confidence that often comes with being born into a fortune and making it bigger. He understands the long odds against succeeding in a primary against an incumbent senator. His interest in making the race springs from issues, not burning personal ambition. Lamont declared in a recent interview in his cable company office that "two things really got my goat." The first was the war in Iraq, which Lamont has opposed from the start. The other was last year's transportation bill with its emblematic millions for the "Bridge to Nowhere" in Alaska.

Iraq, however, is the issue that will drive Lamont's race. He was inspired when hawkish Democratic U.S. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., called for a withdrawal of American troops late last year.

That provided a stark contrast to Lieberman's stalwart support of the war, particularly his optimistic assessment of it in a Wall Street Journal piece in November. Lieberman's chummy relationship with President Bush has added to the "groundswell of anger" that Lamont detects.

So let there be a debate, says the earnest challenger, who will have no trouble mounting and funding a primary campaign. His sunny countenance is more that of the energetic go-getter than ambitious politician. He won't let the race degenerate into a series of bitter accusations.

http://www.courant.com/hc-renniecol0122.artjan22,0,1685433.story?track=mostemailedlink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
adduco Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. time for Joe to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BaLiberalMom Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. I contribute...
to anyone running against him, exect a repub of course,
but any dem or indpendent, yes, I'd give!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you really have to ask this?
:hi:
If he isn't with us, he's against us. I'd support anyone against him that IS NOT republican--or exactly like him, of course. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let me know when he's ready to accept donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Right now, getting rid of Lieberman isn't...
... enough. I want to see him bankrupted and working as a greeter at WalMart for $6/hr, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dems are a big tent. There are some who are hawks. That is who
Lieberman is. 90% of the time he votes as we like.

I don't think now is any time to be pulling down our big tent and trading it in for a pup one.

Why focus on Lieberman? There are 17 others who didn't vote for filibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We trade a DINO that Bush kissed on the cheeks with a real Democrat
and one that has enough of his own money to finance his Senatorial campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Why concentrate on him tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Because he's a scumbag sellout
and we're sick of him letting us down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But don't you understand that Israel is that one issue that he has
to vote aggressively on? He represents a part of the Democratic Party. He does.

If you get so angry that you are intolerant of everyone who is not exactly like you - who may have another belief system - democracy is diminished indeed. And so too a big tent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. With people like that in your tent, I'm glad to sleep on the sand.
Lieberman gives visible political 'concealment' for the fascist right wing. It's one thing to make political compromises that don't sacrifice core principles. It's another to abandon core principles and GET NOTHING IN RETURN. The current fascist regime offers nothing in return for the most extreme right wing policies in the history of this nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, I want him gone.
But I don't want us to eat our own in primary challenges. We need Lieberman and the other traitors to INVADE the Republican party.

More here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x277934

Wouldn't it be nice to have the R's spending their money to keep our DINOs in office while we ran unopposed, real Democrats against them?

Imagine the possibilities. Please, everyone, invite the traitors to joint the Republican party ... ASAP.

-Laelth

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. He did not "vote with the GOP for Alito"
He voted with most other Democrats against Alito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. That vote was totally meaningless and cosmetic
The only way to stop Alito was through a filibuster. Holy Joe did what Al From wanted, give the illusion of opposing Alito without really doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. He voted NO on Alito.
Unless you're talking about the cloture vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. By not supporting filibuster, he gave a "YES" vote to Alito
His subsequent "No" vote was totally inconsequential and meaningless. The only way to defeat Alito was through a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Say buh-bye, Joe!
Don't let the screen-door hit ya on the way out.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Its not going to be that easy.
His approval rate remains very high here and not too many people have even heard of Lamont. I wish him the best but it will be very difficult unseating Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Anyone have an actual e-mail for Ned Lamont?
Please PM me. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Lamont needs volunteers
The only website where one can sign up is http://www.nedlamont.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. We are lying about Dems now?
He voted against Alito. He and 20 others voted for cloture. Are we out to replace all of them?

Anyway, Joe polls at like 68 percent in CT. They love him there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Cloture was the only vote that mattered
Once that was done, ALito was a shoe in because he did not then need a super majority to be approved (60 votes).

And here is how every newspaper is spinning it today...from my area paper, the Columbus (repuke) Dispatch:

Alito to be confirmed!
Republicans easily stop filibuster.


The word EASILY says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. We will see how the voters respond to Ned Lamont v. Holy Joe
Lieberman can always join Bibi Netanyahu and the other lunatics in Likud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. If Lieberman gets less than 60 percent, I will eat a hat
A small one, but I will eat it nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. But a good primary challenge will force him to go more left/moderate.
I'm ALL for it and will send his challenger check(s)(plural)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I hope you are right.
I am VERY disappointed with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. He voted against the filibuster- who is lying?
Just because a DUer is not fooled by his yes/no voting stunt does not make him a liar.

Joe want to have it both ways huh? We will see about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Run, Ned, Run
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. Go, Ned. Godspeed!!
Joe needed to go a long time ago. My husband still mumbles incoherently when Joe appears on the screen of the teevee, "I can't believe I actually voted for that man once."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC