demdiva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 10:02 AM
Original message |
Senator Durbin on the Senate Floor |
|
Alito is "likely to receive more "no" votes then any nominee to the Supreme Court, except Clarence Thomas".
|
n2doc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Boy, that sure makes me feel better |
Justitia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Words right outta my mouth. BFD! -eom |
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
2. And is anyone silly enough to think that will make him humble? |
|
The pattern of the cons is to take every victory no matter how minimal and treat it as though it as a mandate for their most radical positions.
|
SammyWinstonJack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Boy, if that isn't the truth! |
|
The smaller the victory, the more the cons gloat, the more radical they become and the harder they work to shove their radical agenda on the majority of Americans who don't agree with them or their agenda. :crazy:
|
Paulie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
3. If it's not 52 NO votes |
|
then it makes no difference what so ever Mr. Senator.
|
flordehinojos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. i so agree with you ... |
|
don't tell us that a rusted iron pipe is a gold bar. it isn't. so, what difference does it make if alito gets more NO VOTES than thomas... it doesn't. thomas is sitting in the supreme court and so will alito.
thanks for the fake consolation.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |