Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Radio Address: Every Thanksgiving, we remember the story of the Pilgrims who came to America

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 02:51 PM
Original message
Bush's Radio Address: Every Thanksgiving, we remember the story of the Pilgrims who came to America
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 02:56 PM by bigtree
November 25, 2006

Bush: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/11/20061125.html

"Every Thanksgiving, we remember the story of the Pilgrims who came to America in search of a better life and religious freedom. Much has changed in the four centuries since these humble settlers landed at Plymouth Rock. While they were only a shivering few, we are now a strong and growing Nation of more than 300 million. And the desire for freedom that led the Pilgrims to the New World still guides our Nation today."


Typical of Bush to frame the Pilgrim's theft of the land they happened upon, and the oppression of the "savages" they encountered and conquered, as all about the humble settlers' "desire for freedom." Not a word from Bush about the "freedom" of the first inhabitants. It makes the blood boil to hear Bush use the same jingoistic nonsense that the first band of misogynistic thugs used to justify their marauding invasion and occupation of the first inhabitant's land, and realize that it's the same nonsense which guides his thinking about the inhabitants of the lands he's invaded and occupied.


from a Pilgrim's journal (letter by Caleb Johnson): http://www.mayflowerhistory.com/PrimarySources/MourtsRelation.pdf


. . . some will say, what right have I to go live in the heathens’ country?

And first seeing we daily pray for the conversion of the heathens,
we must consider whether there be not some ordinary means, and course
for us to take to convert them, or whether prayer for them be only
referred to God’s extraordinary work from heaven. Now it seemeth unto
me that we ought also to endeavor and use the means to convert them,
and the means cannot be used unless we go to them or they come to us: to
us they cannot come, our land is full: to them we may go, their land is
empty.

This then is a sufficient reason to prove our going thither to live,
lawful their land is spacious and void, and there are few and do but run
over the grass, as do also the foxes and wild beasts: they are not
industrious, neither have art, science, skill or faculty to use either the land
or the commodities of it, but all spoils, rots, and is marred for want of
manuring, gathering, ordering, etc. As the ancient patriarchs therefore
removed from straighter places into more roomy, where the land lay idle
and waste, and none used it, though there dwelt inhabitants by them, as
Gen. 13:6,11,12, and 34:21 and 41:20, so it is lawful now to take a land
which none useth, and make use of it.

And as it is a common land or unused, and undressed country; so
we have it by common consent, composition and agreement, which
agreement is double: first the imperial governor Massasoit, whose
circuits in likelihood are larger than England and Scotland, hath
acknowledged the King’s Majesty of England to be his master and
commander, and that once in my hearing, yea and in writing, under his
hand to Captain Standish, both he and many other kings which are under
him, as Pamet, Nauset, Cummaquid, Narragansett, Nemasket, etc. with
divers others that dwell about the bays of Patuxet, and Massachusetts:
neither hath this been accomplished by threats and blows, or shaking of
sword, and sound of trumpet, for as our faculty that way is small, and our
strength less: so our warring with them is after another manner, namely
by friendly usage, love, peace, honest and just carriages, good counsel,
etc. that so we and they may not only live in peace in that land, and they
yield subjection to an earthly prince, but that as voluntaries they may be
persuaded at length to embrace the Prince of Peace Christ Jesus, and rest
in peace with him forever.


some things never change



http://journals.democraticunderground.com/bigtree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. You can bet the Indians loved the Pilgrims
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 02:57 PM by Submariner

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lawsuits
And the government that leases the land belonging to the Indians to the corporate oil and lumber industries. The government that has been faced with a lawsuit for tens of tens of years because they are cheating the Indians out of their money. That's the govenment for you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bu$h remembers the Pilgrims but forgets why they came to America
as he pushes the right wing Christian fundamentalist agenda. They fled religious persecution and we have come full circle where we must worship only as the fundies think we should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. History has shown us what happens when fundies get in power
1692. Salem, Massachusettes. The Witch Trials were used by the clergy to try and usurp power from the Royal Governor, but it didn't work-people finally came to their senses. But not until several people, my 9-great grandmother included, were dead before their time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The Pilgrims were hypocrites in their complaints of religious persecution
They not only wanted to worship as they pleased, they wanted everyone else to worship as they did. They had no respect at all for the beliefs of the inhabitants they encountered.

some things never change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. The "freedom" many of the Pilgrims came for
was the "freedom" to tell everyone they had to do things their way. When Gabriel Wheldon decided he liked hanging out with the Wampanoags better than living in the English style, he was banished from the colony, which didn't matter to him a whit. He moved to Cape Cod (along with Stephen Hopkins, himself a "Stranger" or non-Puritan, who had been hired to be a liason between the Pilgrims and the Indians)and married Massasoit's neice. Their daughter married Giles Hopkins, Stephen's son. Funny, but after a number of years, all was "forgiven" as far as these folks and Plymouth was concerned...maybe it was too hard for even them to swallow stealing land from fellow Englishmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Massasoit's bargain with the Pilgrims was an ultimate surrender
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 04:07 PM by bigtree

He wanted to use the Pilgrims in an alliance against his rivals, the Narragansett. In the end, by allowing, and enabling the Pilgrims to establish themselves, on the land, and in direct trading relationships with the other tribes which had been previously managed by Massasoit, the bargain ensured the survival of the expedition.



from Pilgrim Hall Museum: http://www.pilgrimhall.org/massa-tr.htm

THE TREATY WITH MASSASOIT

"... the coming of their great Sachem, called Massasoiet. Who, about four or five days after, came with the chief of his friends and other attendance, with the aforesaid Squanto. With whom, after friendly entertainment and some gifts given him, they made a peace with him (which hath now continued this 24 years) in these terms :

I. That neither he nor any of his, should injure or do hurt to any of their people.
II. That if any of his did any hurt to any of theirs, he should send the offender that they might punish him.
III. That if any thing were taken away from any of theirs, he should cause it to be restored; and they should do the like to his.
IV. That if any did unjustly war against him, they would aid him; and if any did war against them, he should aid them.
V. That he should send to his neighbours confederates to certify them of this, that they might not wrong them, but might be likewise comprised in the conditions of peace.
VI. That when their men came to them, they should leave their bows and arrows behind them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The treaty lasted and held many years with the Separatists
Trouble started, and the treaty failed, when the Puritans usurped authority. Like ayeshahaqqiqa, I am descended from Strangers, and tend to view the history of that period from a different perspective. In some small way, the Plymouth Colony experiment (allowing 'Strangers' - non-believers - all the rights and privileges of the church members) was just as much a victim of the 'ultimate surrender' as the Indians.

Would have, could have, should have.

The Theocratic Puritans were the trouble, not the Separatists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. ... and cut out paper Indian headdresses and ....
:eyes:

Did Bush graduate from kindergarten?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Give credit to Bush
He made it through the whole speech without mentioning "September the 11th" even once! When's the last time that happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. he wanted you to think of it though
freedom, freedom, freedom, (Bush is Miles Standish, pass it on) freedom, freedom . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC