Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Bush won the Alito fight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Sleepless In NY Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:09 PM
Original message
Why Bush won the Alito fight
Why Bush won the Alito fight
A look at the decisive dates in the struggle over the Supreme Court

NEWS ANALYSIS
By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
MSNBC
Updated: 8:31 a.m. ET Jan. 31, 2006
WASHINGTON - The Senate's expected vote Tuesday to confirm the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court to replace Sandra Day O’Connor is — along with President Bush’s victory on Chief Justice John Roberts — the biggest domestic victory of his two terms as president.

This is all the more remarkable given the president's anemic approval ratings over the past few months. The latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey, released Monday, shows Bush’s approval rating at 39 percent, which is unchanged from last month’s survey.

How can such an apparently unpopular president win such historic victories?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11099780
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can such an apparently unpopular president win such historic victories
A spineless opposition party and a MSM in Bush's pants....thats how. I don't have to read the article any further than that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. my guess would be majority but hey, you want to spin it away
from the area responsible to kick the dems. again.... go for it. empower bush by weakening the dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh goody. Another MANdate!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. The author nails the crying stunt as the "most important date"
Why Bush won the Alito fight
A look at the decisive dates in the struggle over the Supreme Court

By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
MSNBC
Updated: 8:31 a.m. ET Jan. 31, 2006

Once Alito stepped in, you could argue that the most important date was Jan. 11, 2006, the emotional turning point of his Senate testimony.

Mrs. Alito fled the hearing room in tears after Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. expressed regret to Alito that Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., and other Democrats had attacked him for his membership in the Conservative Alumni of Princeton (CAP).

Some articles in CAP’s magazine — not written by Alito — had voiced inflammatory anti-feminist and anti-gay views. Graham asked Alito whether he was a “closet bigot.” Alito replied, “I’m not any kind of bigot.”

At that moment and at many others during his testimony, Alito appeared to be a sober, cautious and phlegmatic judge. The Democrats had an easier job when they battled Bush appeals court nominees William Pryor and Janice Rogers Brown who had made provocative statements which at least opened the question of whether they had the appropriate judicial temperament.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11099780/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They all got duped by this bitch's fake crying spell
Anyone with a working brain could tell that was planned out in advance. The camera zoomed right in on her at the appropriate time. She got her cue and the scrunced up face began...crying with NO TEARS. Hell,I could have done a better acting job than THAT.It worked. The media whores played it to the max.

It's embarrassing to live in a country with such stupid mental midgets as bu$h and his ass kissers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistwell Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. You don't know
I think that is an unkind thing to say. We have no idea what she was thinking, and no reason to believe she even has opinions similar to her husband. By assuming she is just a robot programmed to think just like her husband, you are buying into the very same sexism you object to in the judge himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. How's THAT!!!!!!!!!
:cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. What she was thinking
What she was thinking?

"Must think of something sad... must think of something sad! Hey, maybe my husband is a bigot..."

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfern Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Fuck the media
"Waaah, my lying facsist husband is being asked real questons in his quest for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. Waaaah Waaaah"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. yeah, and since when do spouses come along to job interviews?! The
woman didn't belong there, period. The hearings are supposed to be serious Congressional business - it's not the Oscars or the Golden Globes, dammit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Historic Victory My Ass! How Fucking Stupid
Heh? How is it historic that a President who's party controls congress got his pick approved? How is that such a big victory for him? This article is idiotic and pure propoganda. There's nothing historic or remarkable about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Very superficial article

mostly hot air.

But it does, finally, actually touch on the real political logic, which emanates out of Bush's stalemate survival but much more so the significant Republican gains in the Senate- middling mandate to push the Court a half or full vote more conservative/Right- in November '04.

The pundits are being too quick, or too easily spun, in terming this a Bush victory. The power that pushed this nomination through was the Republican Senate's, not Bush's.

As for the political price they'll pay for getting Alito through, it appears to be zero at the moment. But I wouldn't be so oblivious as to believe the inference, being made all over, that that's the final score.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. he won because apparently a lot of people . . .
including members of the House and the Senate, are so afraid and/or so compromised that they're fully prepared to accept a police state as a fact of life in the US . . . that's both sad and scary . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why did Bush win the Alito fight? The answer is easy...
The motherfucker still holds all the cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. His party holds a majority in the Senate.
That's all it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hmm
We have a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. He won because he has 55 Republicans in the Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Diebold.
and Katherine Harris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. According to some
It's nader's fault. Though I blame the Intelligent Designer. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-06 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. And what an intelligent design it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC