Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A filibuster would not have been a big deal. That's the frustration.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:21 PM
Original message
A filibuster would not have been a big deal. That's the frustration.
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 01:23 PM by Armstead
IMO the real frustration in the instant defeat of the filibuster is that it was ultimately not all that consequential. It is not likely that a filibuster would have ultimately prevented Alito's confirmation.

The Republicans knew that. Their attacks on a filibuster was just daring the Democrats to a game of chicken.

I'm NOT saying it was unimportant. In symbolic terms, it was VERY important as a sign of life from the Democratic Party. It would have demonstrated that the Democrats are willing to do everything possible to fight back. And it would have been a way to advance the awareness of what the real meaning of Right Wing GOP Politics to the average person.

So it should not have been such an uphill battle just to get the Democrats to pursue it. It should have come naturally.

We should have -- could have -- taken this fight to the wall, regardless of the outcome. Why? Because one of the biggest challenges facing Democrats is to restore the image (and reality) as a party of fighters, who will do everything possible to defend the interests of the majority of the population.

It's good that so many Democrats did vote "No" this morning. But the filibuster could have been part of a real fight, instead of a demonstration of weakness and disarray.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good post
I liked this in particular:

"It's good that so many Democrats did vote "No" this morning."

I guess I choose to stay with this as I don't know what was in the minds of the dems who chose to vote for Cloture.

This WAS a much greater fight than we had against Roberts, and, I am holding onto this as a sign that our dem reps are becoming more willing to fight.

I think that we will see just how much they are willing to fight in the months ahead.

I hope this is not just wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let's hope it isn't so hard next time
If the next time they are tending towards caving in on something they will take a minute and actually ask "How will our base react to this?" instead of asking "How will the Republicans and media react?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC