Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 03:39 PM
Original message |
Legal: Can a state limit commerce to any other (specific) state? |
|
I have no problem working to introduce legislation preventing my state from doing business or doing limited business with states which have draconian abortion laws.
Anyone? I don't need a full answer, just being pointed in a good direction would help.
PB
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Only the federal government can regulate interstate commerce.
|
Bok_Tukalo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I think a more interesting question |
|
is whether or not a Pro-Life state can prosecute its citizens for going to Pro-Choice state to have an abortion or whether or not a Pro-Choice state can deny a citizen of a Pro-Life state the procedure.
|
Bridget Burke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I believe some recent anti-abortion bills would not allow... |
|
Women to leave the state for the procedure. But--how would this be enforced? Set up checkpoints at the border, with pregnancy tests for all women of childbearing age?
Seeking treatment for the possible after-effects of an abortion would be dicey. Obviously, illegal abortions have a high rate of problems. Would women die of infections or bleed to death rather than risk being arrested in the ER? And a small percentage of women receiving legal abortions do need medical help afterward.
Why the HELL would a Pro-Choice state deny women living in Anti-Choice states the procedure?
|
Bok_Tukalo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I was not aware there was an attempt to criminalize going out of state |
|
I am not even sure if there are any laws that makes behaviour or an action that is legal in another state a crime. Wouldn't the activity be outside the State attempting to reach across borders' juristiction?
|
blue2helix
(280 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No - except for health and safety matters |
HockeyMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
5. New York. and New Jersey pre Roe |
|
NY it was legal and NJ is wasn't. Really angered the pro lifers in NJ that women could just hop on a PATH train into NYC for an abortion and there was nothing they could do about it. I remember all the screaming that went on back then.
They all KNOW this. This is why they will attempt to force the choice states in line by FEDERAL laws. I troll their sites and they has always said this. They want a federal law or amendment to constitution to declare a FERTILIZED EGG to be a person. You see, they have even thought about "chemical abortions" by pills too.
|
jfern
(394 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-31-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 03:57 PM by jfern
Is it constitutional to do something like prevent people from crossing state lines to get a pregancy? NO Will the Republicans pass a law to do so, and will justices like Alito uphold that law? PROBABLY
Remember the constitution doesn't matter a damn to them.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message |