Officials say F-16 belongs to New Mexico-based fighter wing, but all its pilots are accounted for?

[NNN0LHI]

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=41798

Mystery surrounds F-16, pilot in Iraq crash

Officials say jet belongs to New Mexico-based fighter wing, but all its pilots are accounted for

By Joseph Giordono, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Wednesday, November 29, 2006



The pilot of an F-16 that crashed Monday in Iraq’s Anbar province is officially listed as Duty Status Whereabouts Unknown, as defense officials confirmed that the plane — though not the pilot — was assigned to a squadron deployed to Iraq from New Mexico.

Pentagon officials have not confirmed broadcast reports and video and still images apparently showing the pilot’s body and parachute on the ground. The pilot’s body was apparently removed before U.S. forces arrived on the scene after the crash, officials said Tuesday.

Air Force officials at Central Command said they had seen a video from Al-Jazeera showing what was “purported to be the pilot’s body,” but the military said they could not authenticate or validate the footage.

The Associated Press reported Tuesday that videotape footage obtained by AP Television News appears to show the wreckage of a U.S. single-seat F-16CG jet in the farm field where it crashed Monday and the remains of an American serviceman with a tangled parachute nearby.

At a Pentagon press briefing Tuesday morning in Arlington, Va., spokesman Bryan Whitman offered no new details of the crash or the status of the pilot. Late Monday, a spokeswoman from Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico, confirmed that the downed aircraft belonged to the 524th Fighter Squadron, 27th Fighter Wing, part of which is deployed to Balad Air Base, north of Baghdad.

But, Capt. Rebecca Garcia said, all of the wing’s pilots were accounted for.

[tanyev]

1. Whaaaa?

Very strange.

[Old and In the Way]

2. I wonder if it a coalition pilot? Maybe a Saud?

Or Israeli? Seems like the pilot's name would have been released by now...unless there's a reason to keep it hidden.

[NNN0LHI]

4. I was thinking mercenary, which may not conflict with your theory n/t

[Richard Steele]

3. More funny bidness, eh? This bears some watching. nm