Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freeper talk of civil war - Bush/Cheney plan to keep power?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Target_For_Exterm Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:13 AM
Original message
Freeper talk of civil war - Bush/Cheney plan to keep power?
I read the disturbing threads this morning about Freepers defying the American popular vote and responding with violence. Could this be the plot many have anticipated the criminals in the White House would resort to to keep power past 2008?

OK, I have my :tinfoilhat: on.

Bush has certainly been cooking up a lot of anger between 'pukes and Dems by saying Dems are terrorists. Could he have had an ulterior motive for this? I've never seen a President/Vice President so in love with dictatorial powers, and so lost to the foundation on which our country was built. So, it makes me wonder what they might still have up their sleeve...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let the asswipes secede
We in the civilized states will just wave buh-bye and offer a prisoner exchange. We get Nawlins and Austin, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. and Savannah
don't forget Savannah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. And Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Durham (on a good day) and Asheville. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. If America degenerates into a Civil War, it would be a disaster
It wouldn't be the neat and tidy north vs south conflict of a hundred and forty five years ago. It would be much more like the way Missouri experienced that civil war, neighbor vs neighbor, armed conflict all the time, no clear delineation of boundries or sides. Chaos, in other words, anarchy and chaos.

I really hope that it doesn't come to that, it would be a disaster for this nation. However seeing how the hate rhetoric on the right has become increasingly framed as a conflict between enemies rather than political parties, I don't think that we can avoid it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. Don't forget that Dallas
ousted all of their Republican judges in favor of Democrats and turned their county blue too.
Progress is being made down here.
But...let me adjust my tinfoil hat here...I think voting machines in Texas are rigged and nobody thinks anything about it so they EXPECT Republicans to win.
But I talked to wayyyyy too many people...Dems and Reps alike...who all said they weren't voting for Republicans, yet they won.:shrug:
What everyone needs to remember...is that there are probably some secrets buried in Austin that the Reps don't want you to see.
It all started there, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read that puerile little thread too
and anyone who takes it seriously is almost as silly as they. It means less than nothing, and so do the kooks that populate freeperville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. We should never forget that a couple of these rightwing nutjobs...
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 10:20 AM by originalpckelly
killed 168 Americans in Oklahoma City.

They can be dangerous, even if there aren't many of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Target_For_Exterm Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. And don't forget the abortion clinic bombings and the killing
of doctors who perform abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yeah, and the unabormber was a left wing nutjob
And there's a a small percentage of digruntled idiots from both political extremes that commit violent acts. C'mon, most freepers are about as dangerous as most DUers. You may not like to admit that, but it's most likely accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. He was not a leftist:
"Beyond Leftism

Primitivists do not see themselves as part of the Left (see also post-left anarchy). Rather they view the socialist and liberal orientations as bankrupt. Primitivists argue that the Left has proven itself to be a monumental failure in its objectives. The Left, according to primitivists, is a general term and can roughly describe all socialist leanings (from social democrats and liberals to Maoists and Stalinists) which wish to re-socialize “the masses” into a more “progressive” agenda, often using coercive and manipulative approaches in order to create a false “unity” or the creation of political parties. While primitivists understand that the methods or extremes in implementation may differ, the overall push is seen as the same: the institution of a collectivized and monolithic world-view based on morality."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-primitivism#Beyond_Leftism

Now ELF and ALF and "weather underground" are/were all leftist terrorist organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Not really because the right attracts authoritarians who have
less of a problem pushing other people around. That's the topic of John Dean's last book, btw.

So, no, we don't produce the same number of violent, extremist terrorists as the right wing nutbowl does. And we certainly don't try to get them elected President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
26. You know, I used to respect your viewpoints here,
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 11:24 AM by TankLV
but I've come to just pity and laugh at you with every new post...

Unibomber "left wing" - only in YOUR mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. I can't say I care what you think of me, but I am curious.
Do you really believe that there aren't people from the left who have committed violence? And yes, I think there's a good argument to make that Kazinsky was influenced by "left" ideas". It's ridiculous to throw a label llke neoluddite or primitivist out there without examining the provenance of those philosophies.

My point is simple. People who are left wing have committed violence. People on the right wing have committed violence. Anyone who doesn't recognize this; and that it's largely a function of human nature more than ideology, has had their brains so addled by partisanship that nothing they say on the topic is worth consideration. It merely reflects blindness. And moral blindness at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Authoritarian types come in right and left flavors...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I guess I am silly...
but I do agree most of the freeps are harmless kooks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. I've had this sick feeling that another attack may come before congress...
swears in the dems with bu$h/Cheney invoking The patriot Act/martial law, thus nullifying the last election. :tinfoilhat:
They can do it and it wouldn't surprise me if they did so to maintain power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Tinfoil Is On A Little Too Tight
Actually, they can't do it in enough time. And, another attack would be a clear demonstration of the failure of their policies. The scrupulous Repubs in Congress (yeah, there are some, of course) would never sit still for it. I doubt even the military would.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. They're all talk
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 10:23 AM by YOY
They're all little cowards anyways. Otherwise they would be on the front lines in Iraq and putting their money where their mouths are.

They don't want to lose what little economic stronghold/job security they have by acting like their brother-in-arms Chad Constanza.

They might threaten some lone pacifist on a desert highway, but are will consign to huffing and puffing and listening to Rush Limbaugh despite all evidence showing that they were dead wrong about EVERYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I agree...
and the groups that want to fight are not freep types that support the present admin...they are RWingers though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Adolescent Rambo wannabees itching to shoot off guns.
And, refight the original civil war that they still can't accept that they lost.

Civil war is about as likely here as a revolution. Which is in the same realm of likelihood as Donald Trump giving all his money to charity or Bush reading "War and Peace" in the original Russian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. I'd be surprised if these geniuses had the sense to reset circuit breakers
in a power outage.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. let them try
the few percent that actually might not faint at the sight of a gun pointed at them would be blown away by the Americans who will fight for their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
15. Who will they get to fight it for them?
Cowardly little shits. Won't even fight the current war they love so much. Any organized civil war action will be put down in a day. We win, we keep everything.

So, sure, bring it you yellow bellied liars. Bring it on. We will simply use you to change out the contents of Gitmo and get back to saving the country. Liberals have a great tradition of killing conservatives in war. The Revolution, the war of 1812, volunarily fighting in Spain, killing Nazis in Europe. We can do it again.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Who Is That In Your Avatar?
Damn Cute!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. That's Thom hartmann.


www.thomhartmann.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. they're too cowardly to fight in iraq, and so like their hero
timothy mcveigh they'll blow up innocent people in some ''evil'' federal building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. Isn't this the truth!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. Do you have a link to those threads?
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 10:49 AM by Bassic
Edit: Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
21. If that is really the case
Advocating open armed insurrection against the government is a violation of federal law and should be reported to Homeland Security.

I bet they are scrubbing those posts as fast as they can.

Treason is still a hanging offense, last I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. All bluff and no bluster....
do you really expect them to come out from behind their keyboards and back up their words? :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lowell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
25. They are a bunch of pimple butted
4Fs. Who would they get to do their fighting for them. They are the minority now and the lunatic fringe of RWers wouldn't even be tolerated by their own party. Bring em on! Keyboard commandos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
28. They're speculating based on a new book....
Mentioned here. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2824318

Because the plot sounded halfway interesting, I looked it up on my local library's Website. Publisher's Weekly more or less trashed it as an implausible right-wing polemic, but when you're desperate to hold on to your power, anything sounds good, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
29. I maintained early in their "administration" , that they did NOT
plan on easily giving all these "newly-found" powers over to a democratic administration.

That said, our constitution and our national resolve would probably stop them from hanging on, but it seemed very eerie to think that they would be spending so much time changing things to "just they way they like them", only to cheerfully hand those powers over to ...say...Hilary:)

Of course I don;t think it was intended to be the case that Bush would stay..just that once the "voting thing" was perfected, they would have the pyramid firmly in place, and would only need to change the top piece every 8 years, as the democrats faded into the sunset for good..

Let's hope that recent events have wised people up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomp Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. Yet again giving too much credit
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 02:01 PM by Chomp
to a bunch of chancers and charlatans.

They are fininshed people. Finished. Not late comebacks, no coups d'etat, no secret plans. They have played their hand, lost and disgraced themselves.

Game over.





Edit to completely alter the meaning of my post and to remove a couple of racist and myseogynist comments I'd left in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC