Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore: 'I would have heeded 9/11 warnings' (Raw Story)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:32 AM
Original message
Gore: 'I would have heeded 9/11 warnings' (Raw Story)
Gore: 'I would have heeded 9/11 warnings'

RAW STORY
Published: Wednesday November 29, 2006

In an interview with GQ Magazine, former Vice President Al Gore - who many Democrats believe should have been determined the winner in the 2000 presidential election against George Bush which the Supreme Court eventually decided - maintained that he would have "heeded the warnings" before the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001, although he added that "no one can say that the 9-11 attack wouldn’t have occurred whoever was president."

.............

Gore admitted that "it’s almost too easy to say, 'I would have heeded the warnings,'" but left little doubt that he thought the president hadn't done as much as he should have, when warned by the CIA that bin Laden was determined to attack the Unites States in the summer of 2001.

"In fact, I think I would have, I know I would have," Gore said. "We had several instances when the CIA’s alarm bells went off, and what we did when that happened was, we had emergency meetings and called everybody together and made sure that all systems were go and every agency was hitting on all cylinders, and we made them bring more information, and go into the second and third and fourth level of detail."

"It is inconceivable to me that Bush would read a warning as stark and as clear as the one he received on August 6th of 2001, and, according to some of the new histories, he turned to the briefer and said, 'Well, you’ve covered your ass,'" Gore continued. "And never called a follow up meeting. Never made an inquiry. Never asked a single question. To this day, I don’t understand it."

Gore said that he thought it was "fair to say" that Bush "personally does in fact bear a measure of blame for not doing his job at a time when we really needed him to do his job."

more at:
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Gore_I_would_have_heeded_911_1129.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bring it on, Al! Bush has gotten a free ride on this bs for way too long!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder why * never asked a single question...?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think Gore is being very gracious......
in saying that MAYBE 911 would have happened anyway. Me thinks it would not have happened. I really like Al Gore but I can remember another time he was gracious and that should have been our warning that bad things were coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Al Queda would still have pursued attacking the World Trade Towers
They did it in 1993. But Gore is right, he would have heeded the warnings and done everything in his power to get the government agencies to work together to prevent Al Queda's mission from succeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I am CERTAIN 9-11 would not have happened if Gore were president - the HartRudman
report on Global Terror would have been read immediately that January and Gore would have worked to implement its urgent guidelines. Any Democrat even halfway familiar with the terror issue would have used that Report like a Bible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. But Bush* did name Cheney as the head of anti terrorism
And how many meetings did Cheney hold again? Before 9-11 he held zero meetings..Zero, which shows how seriously they took the warnings and the Hart-Rudman report which was on their desk Jan 20th 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC