Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Hussein Obama on the ticket = disaster for Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:40 AM
Original message
Barack Hussein Obama on the ticket = disaster for Democrats
Just imagine the 6:30 national news in the fall of 2008. They start with a story about terrorism in the Middle East. They show clips of 9-11 and mention Osama and Saddam Hussein. Then they move to the election and mention Barack Hussein Obama.

It makes no difference what we think here on DU. The GDAV (generally dumb American voters) will not vote for a ticket with that name on it. We will get slaughtered. End of message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh for fuck's sake he hasn't even announced yet
Could we wait til he announces before we DON'T support him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. What a ridiculous post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You don't realize how dumbed down the voters are today
30% of these idiots still support Bushit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thank you for your concern.
Try reading a book. John Dean's "Conservatives Without Conscience," for instance, if you're so concerned about why "30% of these idiots" behave the way they do. Here's a hint: it's not stupidity. It's much, much more frightening.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. It's still ridiculous
People would vote against someone because of their middle name are a fringe minority, not enough to turn an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. I'd be more concerned about someone with Bush in their last name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
45. Not one DEM incumbent lost anywhere on election day! Is that dumb?
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 01:28 AM by RiverStone
Yes, rethugs ARE dumb and dumber; but the American voters at large showed they DID learn something over the past 2 years.

GO Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
46. Exactly.
After Obama got his ass handed to him in the last election he ran in, it's a wonder anybody thinks he could get elected to anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
165. You really think a lot of yourself, don't you?
"GDAV"? Get over yourself. You're making my party look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
141. No ...
It isn't in one regard ... No lie, watch Hardball from yesterday ... That had that scumbag Ed Rodgers on it, and, I had to watch it again because I could not believe he said it ... He called the junior senator from Michigan Barracko Osama Obama ...

This is going to be a talking point for the freaks ... Just the same as the retarded "Call me Harold" ad in Tennessee ...

For the record, the double standard continues ... If the people in question were REPUBLICANS, the outrage would have been been overwheming with what he said, or what Beck said to the Muslim congressman elect ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #141
148. Why let people like that control who Democrats nominate?
That's being held hostage by the fringe minority. And as for Harold Ford, he might not have won, but he got 48% of the vote, more than the last Democrat to run for Senate in Tennessee, Bob Clement who was white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Um, his middle name didn't prevent him from being elected to
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 12:49 AM by SeattleGirl
the Illinois State Senate, and then to the US Senate. Yeah, Jane and John Dumbfuck will probably dirty their diapers over that, but I don't think Obama is a dumbfuck by any means. I bet he already knows what the opposition would try to do with his middle name. His middle name has not stopped him thus far; I don't think he's going to run away screaming into the night rather than face the assholes down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
168. Illinois Isn't Alabama or Utah...
I'm in Illinois, voted for Obama in '04 and will do so again in '10, and I never knew his middle name until it came out last week.

No it didn't matter for him here, but this is a very blue state now and his Senate seat was all but handed to him when the GOOP couldn't put up a credible candidate. Remember Alan Keyes? Also, Obama's enjoyed the support of a very effective political machine that right now can get anyone elected they want in this state.

But this is not Alabama or other red states...and dare a I say a few purple ones as well where the racist vote still counts...especially if there's a close election. Unfortunately this country isn't ready for a black national candidate and IMHO Obama isn't ready for the national stage.

Just listen to the way his middle name was already made into a GOOP Codeword (watch the Ed Rogers on Tweety video to see how its done). He's also already being ridiculed on hate radio...I heard some asshat in Cincinatti on WLW take some nasty shots at his name...and name alone. Unfortunately it took Barack 24 long hours to get the word out that he isn't a Muslim...and that's an eternity when you have a Faux out there spreading the lies and slander and then hate radio amplifying it on 50,000 watts into the South & West.

While I don't think Obama is "ready for prime time"...I could and would support my Junior Senator if he were chosen at the party's VP candidate. I'm more concerned with what my Senior Senator, Dick Durbin, does as the two in command in the Senate as 2008 will mean nothing if Democrats don't do well with their control of the House & Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Imagine a guy named Barack Hussein Obama
Fixes Iraq and catches Osama. I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Do you want to dream, or do you want to win?
We HAVE to win the 2008 election. Placing a first-term senator on the ticket with that name will not cut the mustard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Don't lecture me.
My post is as absurd as yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
54. Like running an Irish Catholic wet-behind-the-ears Senator was a sure bet for a
Democratic loss forty some odd years ago, eh?

"Ooooh, he'll be taking orders from the POPE, he will!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
79. Who would cut the mustard in your estimation?
Who's out there, perfect and smear proof?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. If he's such a weak candidate that his middle name can knock him out
I don't want him. This is ridiculous. A perfect example of mountain meeting molehill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. Surely you jest.
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. If the Democratic party hinges so completely on a single man
then we are in BIG trouble.

That being said, and knowing full well the current misAdministration apparently rotates on the... er, whim of one (dangerously psychotic) person, I think it's utter bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Not on a single man
On his middle name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. My previous post stands unedited.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Right
I think I agree ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Ludicrous alarmism.
His name might be fodder for some typically stupid jokes on Freakshow Republic, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. My grandfather's name was Adolph
and he got elected to the City Council 3 consecutive terms in the late 40's and early 50's. In a real red state too. So I'm sure he must have picked up a large proportion of the dumdum vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
51. Here's another "Adolf" who managed to overcome, as well!
http://www.un.org/themes/sport/ogi.htm

People aren't always stupid. Thank heavens!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairie populist Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
133. My grandpa was named Adolph, too, and my son
was named after him - middle name.

Names carry a negative connotation only if you let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #133
150. One of my favorite politicians is named Wilma Mankiller
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 02:05 AM by Bucky
If someone can be elected chief with that name, I don't think a middle name like Hussein will mean much. People will either vote for him or vote against him. Just ask Woodrow Yeastinfection Wilson or Dwight Poodlekicker Eisenhower if their middle names ever held them back.

(on edit: photo added)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #150
164. No, that's an irrelevant example ...
because Native American voters are better informed than the averaged dumbed down American!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verse18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is a situation that will probably never happen.
There is no longer a need for * or the repugs to invoke 9-11, Osama or Hussein at the same time, let alone in 2008. This thread is seriously lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. I don't think his middle name will be a disaster
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 01:01 AM by Ignacio Upton
But it certainly won't help him. If he runs, you will hear the right-wingers breathlessly uttering "Hussein Osama! Hussein Osama!"

On edit: They already are:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1742604/posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
66. Hahahaha...but of course, they'd have voted for him otherwise!!!
If only he didn't have that doggone middle name!!!!

I think it's delightful that they focus on lunacy like that...makes them look like the idiots they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cool user name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
157. Here's a winner:
Liberals have low standards for blacks. Since Obama can say "ask" instead of "axe", everyone is supposed to be super-impressed.


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. Yeah, let's get a white man with a real 'murkin name on the ticket..
A name like 'george'.

:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:

What a racist thing to post.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. It's not racism. It's facts.
The corporate media will have a field day with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Fact: racism thrives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. You bet it's racism. It's pandering to bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. It seems like racism to me
Perhaps this post is just a way of saying, let's be safe and not run a black person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #30
158. Of course it is - but as long as you say, "It's not the way I feel, I'm just telling you what OTHER
people would say," then you can pretend that it's not bigotry and, as a bonus, whine that people are accusing you of being a racist if anyone calls you on it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
56. You're the only one having a field day, it would seem.
You're doing a great job projecting YOUR personal fears/prejudices and your lack of faith in American voters. I don't think they're all stupid racists, myself. I think they can listen to debates, decide that they like someone based on their intellect and quality of their ideas and their vision for America, and make their choice on something MORE than the person's middle name. Hell, Macaca's middle name was fucking FEEEEEELIX, and he managed to win a couple of elections before his ass got bounced for getting all racist on a teenager.

Heck, if your attitude prevailed, the GOP would have kept the House and Senate. Glad there aren't more like you, frankly....we'd all have to abandon hope if that were the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #56
166. Nail, meet head....l
MADdem slammed you into that wall! (In other words, exactly, MADdem!) Methinks that he's projecting his feelings onto the American people a little too much, and it's a horribly closed-minded view of both the candidate and of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. You don't understand -- we can't lose the Klan vote.
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Maybe we should recruit senator macaca for the Dem ticket?
We'd get the Klan vote!

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. I don't know - what's his middle name?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #32
57. Heh, heh...it's fucking FEEEEEEEEEEELIX!!!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. We should not disqualify a candidate based on his name.
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 01:07 AM by pa28
But we'll certainly hear this over and over. By the time election day comes it'll morph into "Hussein Osama".

:eyes:

That's just life as a Democrat. We'll tarred and feathered no matter who we pick.

Might as well go with the strongest candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
24. How often do they use middle names?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. The corporate media will use it every single day
We're fighting fascists, not democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. You don't fight fascists by caving to them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. They haven't been doing it so far.
And presumably the corporate media weren't thrilled about his being a Senator, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
62. Gee, why didn't they use it in his other contests? Huh? What, they just figured this out, AFTER he
got elected to the Senate? Ooooooooh!!! What a bunch of Jimmy Olsens they are!

I don't know who you are fighting, fascists, democrats, or your own sad and pathetic racist demons, but your entire thesis is pretty damned disturbing, frankly. Let's not run the black guy because of his middle name? Gimme a break.

I find it amazing that you'd even post such a sucky, discriminatory, and childish thought--but you're getting the reaction you expected, I imagine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. I'm just warning you
Don't you get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #65
68. Oh, I "get" it all right--I get exactly what you're doing. You're not even subtle. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. And you don't know what you're talking about
I want Bush and his crime family out of office. I want the best possible ticket to kick those bastards out of office. Then I want the DLC neutered. Then I want the trade deals like NAFTA renegotiated. Then I want tax breaks for the rich eliminated. Then I want VA funding restored. Then I want something done about global warning. Oh, hell the list is too long to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #71
76. Oh, really? So that's why you advocate denying a talented American
an opportunity to compete with everyone else, if he so chooses, for the nomination? Because he has an Islamic middle name? Because you're AFRAID of the pathetic opinion of a bunch of asswipes who wouldn't vote for any Democrat, even one named Jesus H. Fucking Christ, Son of God And Our Lord, anyway?

Grow the fuck up. Your thesis is asinine, racist, shameful and disgraceful. It smells to me like a cover for "We can't run a Black man." It isn't a concept any Democrat could get behind, because it's frankly disgusting. And your "fears" about the "Bush crime family" are insufficient cover for what you're trying to sell.

Shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #65
73. Burning crosses are still used as warnings, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #73
81. Indeed.
And what this lousy thread is, is a virtual cross-burning. It's offensive in the extreme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. It's a virtual cross-burning by a very 'concerned' individual. Yes, very offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #65
138. Even worse, you know,
people might think he's Mexican! The horrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #65
167. Warning us?
What the heck? Duh... his middle name is Hussein. Big Freaking Deal! I think we know the ramifications of which you speak. That a few bigotted idiots will associate his name with Islam (and Osama Bin Laden and Sadaam Hussein). Of course. But, it seems to me that only a few idiots would do so, and they are most likely idiots who wouldn't vote for a distinguished black man, or even a Democrat, so your warning is truly ridiculous.

And not only is it insulting to Barak Obama, it is insulting to the american people. Assuming prejudice and ignorance on the mass population. What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeffrey_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
116. oh bullshit....
fucking relax about the middle name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #24
169. Hmmmm, Let me think..............
Dwight David Eisenhower..DDE
John Fitzgerald Kennedy...JFK
Lyndon Baines Johnson....LBJ
Richard Milhous Nixon
George Herbert Bush
William Jefferson Clinton
George Herbert Walker Bush..GHWB

Just pointing out that a middle name has been used fairly often in the past 60 years. To the point where the presidents were referred to by their initials.

Agree a candidate should not be defined by how their name sounds. However, I remember that Jimmy Carter, although elected, was put down a lot for going as "Jimmy" instead of Jim or James.

Many voters are not as sophisticated or enlightened as those here at DU. Many vote with their gut instead of their heads. If a name doesn't sit well with their gut........

Just let me ask you,have any of you ever formed an impression of someone just by their name, before getting to know them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. Do the Italians still use the name "Benito?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #28
47. Well, yeah, they do--Benito Carbone comes to mind
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benito_Carbone

It's also a not-uncommon name in spanish speaking nations.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
31. There are many reasons I don't back Obama in 2008. His middle name
is not one of them.

The American electorate proved in November that they're not stupid, just slow to get pissed. Well now they're pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
33. I have nothing against Obama
I'm just warning you what the corporate press has in store for us if he is on the ticket. The 2008 election is going to be tight for various reasons that we all understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
34. How idiotic that assertion is. That's like saying that someone named JESUS
would be excoriated because some asswipe named Jesus committed murder, like, say, this guy: http://www.sonoma-county.org/da/press_releases/press_091206.htm

The name Hussein doesn't COME from Saddam, it comes from one of the two sons of Ali, Hassan and Husein. It's a name with religious overtones.


Ali's elder son Hassan accepted a pension in return for not pursuing his claim to the caliphate. He died within a year, allegedly poisoned. Ali's younger son Hussein agreed to put his claim to the caliphate on hold until Mu'awiya's death. However, when Mu'awiya finally died in 680, his son Yazid usurped the caliphate. Hussein led an army against Yazid but, hopelessly outnumbered, he and his men were slaughtered at the Battle of Karbala (in modern day Iraq). Hussein's infant son, Ali, survived so the line continued. Yazid formed the hereditary Ummayad dynasty. The division between the Shia and what came to be known as the Sunni was set. http://www.islamfortoday.com/shia.htm

It's one of those "teachable moments" that the media can have fun with, if they so choose. If Barak Obama has trouble winning, it won't be because of his middle name, or even his first or last name. It'll be because some bozos aren't ready to see an American with some African ancestry get the gig, or it could be because some rabid anti-tobaccoists get all excited because the guy .... SMOKES!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. How many voters know this?
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 01:18 AM by Elwood P Dowd
I say a tiny minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #37
70. How many opportunities have your "corporate media" passed up to warn the public?
Answer: several.

The only one worried about this is you, try as you might to "sound the alarm."

Your thesis is asinine. You really have outdone yourself, this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. He SMOKES? Oh, f@ck me, forget it!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #38
82. The kiss of death for the anti-tabacky squad!!!! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #34
75. African ancestry he has.
But he doesn't have African/American ancestry. Four hundred years of cultural tradition that influenced every facet of American life. That is NOT part of his background.

I feel like I'm the only one who noticed that and I'm not entitled to. And I don't know if it matters but it nags at me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #75
80. I didn't say he did. I said he was an American with African ancestry.
His Mama gave him the American, and his Paw the African.

Assuming he runs, if his ideas are good, and he can motivate and inspire, it doesn't matter what his ethnicity is. And there shouldn't be a concern that he's not "American-Black" enough. Hell, no one had a lick of a problem with the concept of Colin Powell running, and he wasn't "American-Black" enough, either, given that his parents were from Jam-Rock...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #75
89. What the hell is this post supposed to be about?
Seriously, what the fuck does it matter? You don't "catch" culture from your BLOOD for crying out loud! You are RAISED in a culture by participating in it. By BLOOD, I guess Obama isn't "American" enough for you, but the fact of the matter is that he is as American as someone whose ancestors came here from the Mayflower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #75
118. Of course he is African American.
Just as other people are Italian American, or whatever. You don't need a certain number of generations, and you certainly don't need 400 years, in order to qualify. Since his father was born in Africa and his mother is white, Obama is African American and European American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
36. The only people that dumb will vote Repuke regardless. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
119. Exactly. We forfeit the idiot vote anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
39. So now we don't even wait for Republicans to come up with shallow slurs?
We have to invent and apply them to our candidates ourselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. We always were pretty good at self-slurring. All the Repubs have to do
is wait, and then copy our playbook. Waffles, flip flops: they started with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #43
61. I don't think we've ever been good at that. But the trolls...
...who have infiltrated our ranks have sure made it look like we have.

:hi: LC.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #61
83. Hi CW!
I guess I was thinking more about the primary season of 2004 as opposed to here at DU. As the candidates campaigned against each other, the Republicans took note of the rhetoric, and when our candidate became apparent, all they had to do was pullout the primary playbook. I was under the impressing calling Dean the waffler and Kerry the flip flopper originally came from the primaries.

I suppose it happens on both sides of the aisle when there isn't an incumbent. I just wish we could find a way to campaign that didn't also give he other side fuel for the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Right you are~ I wonder why we do that ---huum
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
42. So then when should Obama run? In 10 years...100 years...
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 01:23 AM by RiverStone
It starts somewhere; and if Obama won his way through the DEM primaries, I'd vote for him in a heartbeat!

Remember the GDAV did not vote one DEM incumbent out of office across the whole USA on election day! That does not sound so dumb to me. The rethugs are dumb, NOT the American voters at large. We WON big and we can win BIG with Obama too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #42
49. "We WON big and we can win BIG with Obama too".
We won tons of close races. The repukes and the corporate media will come back with a vengeance. We need a ticket that can withstand what's coming. A young senator from Illinois named Hussein Obama is not going to win in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. How much more racist can you get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. This is NOT ABOUT RACE DAMMIT!
This is about kicking those bastards out of Washington. When will you get it? We can't afford to put our favorites on the ticket. We have to put people on the ticket that can actually WIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. It's about you thinking that someone can't win because they have an ethnic name
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 01:46 AM by Heaven and Earth
As though we were electing "Best Anglo-American Name" not a president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #55
122. My money's on Matthew Thomas Johnson
and Johnson Matthew Thomas. An unbeatable ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. What you've posted is racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. I haven't posted anything that is racist.
Everything I've posted concerns what the opposition will do if Obama is on the ticket. They are the racist and fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. Oh, it's all about this invisible "they" eh? You carry their water for them here. Why? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #59
139. Projection. It's an interesting concept
Perhaps one to look up? You may find out who "they" are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #53
72. Oh PLEASE. We did a pretty good job in this last election, and our good friend
Barak

Hussein

Obama managed to win a Senate seat despite that name of his.

This last election cycle was an exercise in "kicking those bastards out of Washington." Or didn't you notice?

When will YOU get it? The voters have awakened. They aren't buying that GOP hatefest bullshit anymore, so you might stop shopping it around--it's out of fashion, even amongst most of the Repiglicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #53
101. Certainly sounds like it to me.
Let's recap: You're claiming that people will balk at voting for Obama because his full name is "Barack Hussein Obama." You're partially right--but the only people dumb enough to do so would vote Republican under ANY circumstances. So why pursue them? All you're doing now is digging yourself in deeper. If he is the favorite of the American people then we should support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #53
137. Obama has an 86% favorable rating
That's higher than almost any other candidate out there. Americans like him. Stop projecting your own prejudices onto others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
More Than A Feeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. The ability to withstand "what's coming" depends on the content of his character
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 01:44 AM by Heaven and Earth
not the color of his skin, or his middle and last name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
120. His name is Barack Obama, not Hussein Obama. Not that it should matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
48. and don't nominate a ticket that rhymes with "Sore Loserman"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #48
87. I'd prefer a ticket that rhymes with "More Reinhold"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
selfdestructive Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
60. don't run obama

thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. ahem...why so?
hmmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #60
67. How about some elaboration?
:freak:

...taps foot, hums

thanks

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
selfdestructive Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #60
85. because it's a waste of a ticket

don't run obama
don't run hillary
i know how hard it is to hear but its true and dont waste all of our time with the idealism please....
shit is too out of control and its too important.

you need a candidate the other side can unwillingly vote for.
like bill clinton.
neither of the above mentioned fit that.

kerry edwards? yeah theyre both done too...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #85
86. It's VERY clear who the best candidate for the job is, as far as I'm concerned
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 03:34 AM by impeachdubya


He's got the brains, the experience, the gravitas, and he's been right on Iraq from the git-got-get-go. But most importantly, he's the best candidate because he understands that the NUMBER ONE security issue facing us in this century is the Environment.

I don't happen to think Obama should be the Presidential Nominee in '08, either. (However, I wouldn't rule him out for the VP nod)

But you know what? If all you do is lay one line negative bash posts on Democrats, you're quickly going find that you're rather unpopular around here. At the very least you should back up your assertions.

Welcome to DU. Enjoy your stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
selfdestructive Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. i can live with unpopular

i can't find a fault with gore.
let him choose the right running mate this time.
just look at what's happened to his last running mate since 2000... (psstt lieberman)
the time i could've saved you all there...

obama is not even vp material.
as much as i despise having to apoligize for the truth, ill make an exception here.

if you're leaning towards gore make your next choice as good as him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #88
115. "You all"? Who is you all?
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 12:31 PM by impeachdubya
Assuming you're a Democrat, you're as much a part of the process as the rest of us.

Right?

As for dream tickets, I'd like to see Gore-Feingold. Realistically, I think Gore-Clark could be a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #86
106. But but but his surname means BLOODY VIOLENCE! -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #106
121. What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #121
143. He's making a joke about this idea that people are going to vote based on
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 04:26 PM by impeachdubya
Obama's name.

And I agree with him.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #85
102. Thank God you're here.
Because otherwise we wouldn't know who to vote for! Who gives a shit about "idealism" anyway? I mean, we don't need change! We don't need someone in the White House with qualifications and the ability to listen to reason! Hell, why don't we all just vote Republican, because we can't afford idealism.

Goddamnit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
69. You forgot the word "ridiculous" in the line "End of Message"
I think Obama's not ready to be at the top of the ticket, but he'd be great in the #2 slot. With Al Gore at the head.

LET THEM RUN AGAINST THE GUY'S MIDDLE NAME. Then we can say "Is that all you've got?"

Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
74. All I want is the best possible ticket to kick the repukes out of office
Now that everyone has crucified me, I'm going to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #74
77. Well, you did one recommendation.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
78. Obama's name and smoking habit will have no effect on the electorate.
If you believe that, maybe you'll believe Dukakis didn't win in 1988 because he was short and had a Greek last name.

Maybe you'll believe Bill Clinton's birth name being "Blythe" would conjure up images of a mutiny and the military rebelling.

Maybe you'll believe Humphrey dyeing his hair cost the Dems the 1968 election.

Maybe you'll believe that Gore's bald spot cost us the 2000 election, or that his hair transplants would cost us the 2008 election.

Maybe you'll believe Kerry's botox injections cost us the 2004 election.

Maybe you'll believe that Johnson's heart attack, smoking and drinking habits, floppy ears and craggy face cost him the 1964 election...oh wait, we won that won in a historic landslide.

Obama is not my favorite primary candidate, but trying to say he won't win because of stupid stuff like this is just plain ridiculous.

How many presidents have had the middle name Gamaliel? Delano? Baines? Milhous? Birchard? S?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
90. What a tool...
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 04:08 AM by Solon
Seriously, what the hell is this? Playing by the Repuke play book now? Seriously, why the fuck should we coddle Gods be damned racists just because of some preconceived fear that you concocted in your twisted little mind? Seriously, if you have a problem with Obama's name, that's your problem, not his, and not the Democratic party's either. If he runs, he runs, and I will happily vote for him, and I don't give two shits what the M$M and the Repukes say.

BTW: You are definitely follow the example shown in your sig line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #90
91. It's playing the fear card....of course, ya never know!! Oooooooooh!!!!!!
This bozo might be right...whatever will we do when the GOP finds out about Wesley "Mussolini" Clark, Al "Hitler" Gore, and Hillary Rodham "Pol Pot" Clinton! They've done such a swell job of hiding their pesky middle names thus far, but thanks to Barak Obama, the word may well have gotten out!!!!

Everybody now, wring your hands in despair!!! Oh dear, what WILL we do??? We're DOOOOOOOMED, I tell you....doooooooooooooooomed!!!!


:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. Geez....I think the guy needs a little work experience before he gets
my vote for higher office. This hype is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #92
104. The issue postulated here isn't experience, though. It was never raised.
The issue in the context of this discussion is the man's MIDDLE name. It "touches" on two powderkeg issues, race and religion, while managing to appear above those frays. But if I had to bet, I'd probably make money betting that this middle name business is code for something pretty goddamned ugly.

As for "experience" he's running pretty close to the experience level of JFK, for whatever that is worth, in the political arena. JFK had the added experience of being a junior officer in command of a PT boat during WW2, and having to make command decisions involving the lives of his crew under tremendous stress and injury.

Here's what I think about 'experience.' If the guy wants to get up there and debate, and does well, and has sound ideas, he'll attract people to his cause. If he can't make his case, he won't. Ruling him out because of a vague thing called "experience" is as prejudicial as ruling him in because you want to check a diversity block off on a field of candidates. Quite frankly, I'd say his experience level by 08 will compare favorably to Mayor "Let's Shoot Us Some Black Guys" Giuliani, Mitt "I ran the Olympics, and Sat With My Thumb Up My Ass for 4 Years in MA" Romney, or Newt "I Wed Three Wives, Resigned In Disgrace, And Haven't Done Jackshit in Eons" Gingrich. Experience, as often as not, isn't gained just by the jobs you occupy, but with the opportunities you grasp while holding those jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #92
130. First, I never said I'd vote for him in the primary...
While my post could be considered vague, I meant that I would vote for him in the General after he won the primary, in which I may, or may not, have voted for him as the Democratic presidential candidate. I don't really participate in primary fights, you will never know who I will vote for in my State's primary for President, period. However, this does NOT mean that I'll be silent when stupid shit like this thread is started, while I have reservations about Obama, NONE of them are even remotely related to either his full name or his race. I think he needs more experience myself, I just hate it when people make issues out of stupid non-issues like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
93. Oh mah goodness!
We cain't have that Borat Saddam Osama on the ticket! We're DOOOOOMED!!!!! :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #93
103. Okay, if his name was "Borat"
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 11:05 AM by Arkana
I would most DEFINITELY support him. :rofl:

"Mister Obama, you have the floor."

"Very nice! How much?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
94. I can see what you mean.
I try to be a realist and I think it's dangerous to underestimate the intolerance of the American people these days. All the Republicans will need to cast doubt on his patriotism is the name Hussein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
95. Hey Elwood P Dowd
Is your real name Ed Rogers?

Cause he's that only one that's been spewing this crap lately.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #95
126. You may be on to something there!
Hmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #95
144. Ahhh, you Mainiac you, this Masshole salutes you!!!!!
Well said, well played, spot on, and right on the doggone money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #144
151. A Masshole salute to a Mainiac is always welcome
Course, most of them involve only one finger (or as we say up here...."fingah") :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #151
153. I do love Maine...I'm thinking of buying some land up your way in Aroostook Cty
I do promise to be a good Nay-Bah!!!! And salute with all my fingers!!!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #153
160. Why so far?
Got plenty of good land around here (N. Penobscot). Hell, one of "YOUR people" just built a nice cozy $900K+ "camp" on the lake front down the hill from me.

But if you insist on Potato-land, try around Mars Hill. You can get a great view of the new wind farm up there. I hear the early morning sun reflecting off them spinning turbines is quite lovely.

But if you do move up here, let me know. Always nice to have another "D" in the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #160
172. I would NEVER do that obscene "camp on steroids" shit
It offends me!!! Out of state nitwits do the same crap on the Cape, and they've ruined it for the regular folk.

I'm interested in Aroostook because I've a relative who likes the area around Houlton (has a ton of friends up that way) and the proximity to Canada from there. It's always nice to have someone who LIKES the area to go check your assets for you, too! Odds are probably close to even he'd retire up that way if I do end up getting something. I've been up there twice to look around, I find the people really mellow, and the area has a nice, slow pace that appeals.

If I bought a chunk of land with a small (nonseasonal) house on it, he'd use it more than I would, along with some of the hunting and fishing branch of the family (I'm not in that branch, but if you clean the fish I'll eat it!). He likes ME in all seasons. I'd probably go up more in the winter with the youngsters who visit from the Carribean during the cold weather and never see much in the way of snow, but as I continue to age, who knows? I could end up as a part time ME resident!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
96. It's too bad his middle name is Hussein - the 'pukes will have
a field day with it. That haggish Bay Buchanan always says "Osama, I mean Obama" already. That said . . . I think he should run and here's why. People can campaign for office any time they want, but the magic only happens once and it usually doesn't happen at all. The magic is surrounding Obama at this moment and he ought to go with it. If he happened to win the nomination, I don't believe he would allow his name to be swiftboated. He's too proud of his heritage for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #96
124. That is almost exactly what Dick Durbin is telling him
He's got the magic right now and he should ride that wave because it doesn't often come around twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
97. Unfortunately...
You are probably correct. "..and my opponent, Barack Hussein Obama - a Democrat, believes we should have a different course in the Middle East....I bet he does!" Of course, the Repubs would not sink to those depths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
98. I don't like Obama
But I don't think his name should prevent him from running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
99. Hussein is a great name. What did hussein do to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
100. No worries. Saddam will be dead, and Osama already is...
You think somebody won't vote for this man because of his name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
105. I don't think many Democrats would vote for someone with that name either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #105
109. Yeah, it certainly hurt him in Illinois, where he was so popular they couldn't find
a Republican to run against him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #105
111. Doesn't sound like you don't have much faith in the intelligence of democrats, then n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #111
132. Oops, forget the "don't" in the above message
I just noticed it and it's too late to edit. Speaking of intelligence...:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
107. Just to add to the list of others saying this: What a crock of shit
His charisma, intelligence and general appeal trumps that stupid shit about his name.

If his name was an issue, he never would have won in Illinois.

My tiny sample test is my husband, who is a registered Rebub who voted for Clinton, then Bush the first time (he bought that "compassionate conservatism" crap), then voted for neither in 2004 because he hated Bush AND Kerry.

He would vote for anyone over Hillary, he hates her.

But the other day he said he would consider voting for Obama, after getting a closer look.

These are the people we need to win over, the fence sitters and independents. We are never going to win the wackos who obsess over Obama's middle name or the fact that his name sounds like "Osama." Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
108. I remember hearing a lot of that in Illinois when he ran for Senate.
It turned out to be crap then too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
110. Silly
He did so poorly in his run for Senate, right? He even got a big chunk of the GOP vote here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
112. Obama rhymes with Osama
and he had no trouble getting elected to the Senate. It will be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #112
152. And it rhymes with Oh, Mama!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
113. We need to find somebody named John Glenn Smith.
Then, we can't lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #113
123. Damn!
That was the strategy and you blew it!! No one can be elected after an endorsement from someone with "Contra" in their screen name!

Guess we'll have to pick another name...errr candidate, that is. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
114. Bunk! and if the American people can't differentiate between them
then something is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
117. This is one of the oddest, and most ill-conceived posts I've ever seen here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
125. The GOP appreciates your business!
I heard Ed Rogers spewing the same Hussein crapola on Hardball the othernight. Keep it up! Say it three times a day to everyone you meet on the street!

That way, if and when Obama files papers and announces there won't be a soul out there who's not going to respond with a roll of their eyes.

And speaking of names...It always seemed odd to me that Bushetals (and others) referred to Saddam Hussein as simply "Saddam". I could never figure out what point they were trying to get across with using the friendly first-name basis approach. :shrug: And that being said, only now does it seem notable that Obama's middle name is 'Hussein'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
127. Dumb...dumb ...dumb ...dumb
nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
128. And he's black.
Can you imagine if American's found that out? Oh, my !!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zreosumgame Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
129. snarky posts like this one
do nothing to help and only hurt, everyone. Giving creadence to bullshit like this only appeals to the worst people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
131. This post is beyond stupid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
134. That's like saying people would not vote for Dukakis because of his name?
Uh..never mind. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #134
149. No, it's not. And I bet the poor souls who were rounded up
and held without charge and beaten, even killed, after 9/11 would probably agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #149
161. There were actual stories that people did not vote for Dukakis...
because of his name. It's unfortunate and dumb but it's naive to think the American voters are smart enough to distinguish after the last eight years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #161
162. That's not significant.
No shit the democrats aren't going to get the type of voter who is scared by a candidate's name. Not getting the KKK vote didn't have any significant impact on Dukakis's loss. The truth is that polls showed that Dukakis would have enjoyed the largest and most significant lead if he had selected a specific candidate for VP -- Jesse Jackson. Guess what? The jackasses who wouldn't vote for the ticket because of Dukakis's name sure as fuck weren't going to vote for a ticket with Jesse on it. But at the time, the majority of American voters said they would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #161
171. I'd be about the last one to misunderestimate the ethnocentricity
of American voters. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
135. Well. There 's 10 seconds of my life I'm not going to get back. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
136. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
140. Why?
If people truly can not separate him from Sadaam Hussein, then they are stupid. But, I have more faith in the American people than to fall for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
142. Another thread were we have to be afraid of something. Geesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaronbees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
145. Thanks for pandering to the lowest common denominator
Cowardly indeed.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
146. Partially correct.
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 01:51 AM by Xap
Many of the GDAV will not vote for that name. But I don't think it's because it sounds too "terroristic." I rather think it's because it is not a good ol' boy name that derives from northern Europe, primarily the UK.

Political tribalism.

I have great respect and admiration for the state of Minnesota, but I nevertheless doubt that Keith Ellison would have been elected if his name were Muhammed Saeed Abdula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
147. I Say Learn To Respect The American Voters A Bit More And Maybe You'll Win More Of Them Over.
About 30% of the voters are dumb beyond reproach. But the rest choose what they consider to be the best for their own reasons. Obama is an extremely talented Senator who will impress the hell out of many many people. Any voters who even have the slightest ability to vote for a Dem, are not going to refuse to based on his name. Undermining and minimizing the intent of the average voter in such a way as you just did is a huge disservice to our cause.

I think Obama is brilliant and would do just fine. Not sure if he's ready in 08, but if not then when the time comes he'll do fine. And it will be his character, his ideas, his personality, his promise, his presence, his context and his words that voters vote for: Not his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #147
173. I guess I'll get flamed too... oh well.
Edited on Sat Dec-02-06 05:56 PM by PBass
Forget about Obama's middle name. Forget that he's black. His name is a liability IMO. I don't think it's a ridiculous notion to bring it up for discussion, and this guy doesn't deserve to get ripped personally for doing so. America still has a problem with racism, and ethnic-sounding names are a liability IMO.

Getting elected president isn't only about who is best qualified or who would do the best job... If it were, Bush would not be in the White House. The president is a spokesmodel. Just being "boring" is considered a liability with voters...!!!!

"It's about you thinking that someone can't win because they have an ethnic name"

Actually, I do believe an ethnic name is a liability in a presidential election, just like being "stuffy" was considered a liability for John Kerry. Since presidential elections are won/lost by just a few percentage points, it's not out of line to discuss it.

Do I think Michael Dukakis lost some potential voters because of his name? Why YES, yes I certainly do. People are superficial. Not everybody is a political junkie who studies the issues. A lot of intangible or less-tangible things factor into an election, beyond the candidate's platform and experience. In my opinion, you don't want to give voters a reason NOT to vote for you (or to stay home).

And by the way, I don't think Obama is experienced enough for my tastes. I would like to see a more experienced candidate run at the top of the ticket (I feel the same way about John Edwards, by the way). I'd rather see someone who is viewed as a seasoned heavyweight, at the top of the Dem ticket. After 8 years of Bush incompetence, voters want someone experienced on the national (and international) stage.

This has nothing to do with how I feel about Obama's political views... he's mostly pretty good, he's certainly NOT PERFECT. (he voted for the bankruptcy bill and for the patriot act, I believe). By the way, the GOP has the exact same problem with several of their candidates... a candidate with the name PATAKI has a liability. A candidate with the name GIULIANI has a liability. A candidate who is a Mormon has a liability. These candidates will have a hard time in a national general election because a lot of people are not as open minded or well-informed as we are.

Just my opinion, I could be wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
154. Maybe Obama should change his name to "Bush" or "Cheney"...
That'll be a comfort. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamletsophelia Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
155. forget it...
dparty is not going to take back the white house with obama and clinton on the ticket,,, just not possible, it's debatable whether they've got the goods ... not dynamic people it's stupid... there has to be something better out there has to be.... where though??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
156. Hate to say it, but I agree.
Its about getting voters to pull the lever (or press, and repress, and repress the right spot on a touchscreen).

The GADV will deliver the winner, like it or not.

And coupled with Obama's perceived (rightly or wrongly) lack of experience, he seems to be one of the worst candidates for actually winning. Not to say he shouldn't run, he should if he decides to, I agree with Edwards on that. Anyone who feels they can contribute to the good of the nation should run (well, anyone with the resources).

Reality has little to do with reason in present day America. And in reality, we need a good share of the GADV's vote.

You point out his middle name is a liability in the reality of affecting the vote. I'm not happy about it, but I agree. Having said that, I don't think he has a shot at the nomination. Forgive me for pushing my own choice, but we need Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
159. What a stupid post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
163. Yeah, and Illinois voters will never elect someone with the "weird"
name Barak Obama in 2004 so it was said. He won with 70% which is an Illinois Senate election record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
170. Which state elected a Muslim to the United States House of Representatives last month?
I think that's a rather silly reason to vote against someone.

Don't worry, though....I don't think Obama will run in 2008 anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC