Wonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 06:58 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Negative attention is better than no attention |
|
ie. 'Say what you want about me, as long as you spell my name right.'
Discuss?
|
Wonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Drudge seems to think so. Limbaugh seems to think so. |
|
Scarborough seems to think so. Coulter seems to think so.
:shrug:
I could go on...
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I think reading DU should answer that question for you. |
ClintonTyree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 07:40 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm not the attention grabbing type... |
|
I'd rather be invisible, doing my work far from the eyes and ears of those watching. I want to leave the smallest footprint possible, if any at all.
|
dipsydoodle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Technically the answer is yes |
|
Negative attention is actually a positive statement whereas no attention is bland indifference.
|
Lilith Velkor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-30-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
on whether the negative attention consists of words or bullets.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message |