Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay, conservative "whites" ... if you're afraid of becoming the "minority"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:20 AM
Original message
Okay, conservative "whites" ... if you're afraid of becoming the "minority"
(this argument confuses me ... I'd have to get the details to be sure, but if one group is 45 percent, and ALL THE OTHER MINORITY GROUPS TOTAL 55 PERCENT, but no one "minority" group totals more than 15 percent or so, how is the overwhelming majority a "minority"?)

then get busy having litters of kids ... I mean, if you're a conservative white male, isn't it your belief that having babies was the sole reason why women are on this Earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lizerdbits Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think they only see "white" and "not white"
All non whites are equally lower according to some, I don't think some people differentiate once they see you're not white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I get into trouble around here occasionally
Because I DON'T share the prejudices people are used to. This is an overwhelmingly Hispano part of town and I honestly have no clue when it comes to the prejudice northern Europeans are supposed to have. They don't quite know what to do with me until they know me better.

Bigots tend to flock together, to reinforce each other's distorted thinking so that it looks like common sense. People here expect me to share the prejudices of white Angelenos or white Texans and I've got a very different set of them than they do.

There's nothing like moving to an area with different prejudices to make you realize just how stupid yours were all along. Too bad the experience isn't mandatory.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Has it occurred to you that this post is racist in and of itself? Sweeping
generalizations and tired stereotypes are offensive no matter to whom they are directed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yes, it did occur to me that this post is racist in itself - because it was based
on the premise of the Repuke talking point - that "whites" are going to become the "minority" in this country - despite the fact that, in another post on this thread, the overwhelming majority of this nation is, ahem, white ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think your figures are way, way off.
In the last Census, those who are "White Alone" (which includes Hispanic Americans, apparently), number 215 million out of 288 million. Of the 215, Hispanic Americans number 44 million, leaving 171 million white people out of 288. That's 59% by my calculations.

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFPeople?_submenuId=people_10&_sse=on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I figured my numbers were way off, but using the usual rightie argument
of "whites" becoming a minority in this country, I was overly generous on the part of the non-white minorities in my initial post. I knew it wasn't accurate. I appreciate the clarification of my numbers, which further makes my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ahem!
You said: "...if you're a conservative white male, isn't it your belief that having babies was the sole reason why women are on this Earth?"

If that's the way conservative white males truly think, they'd best re-think. With the advances in the medical world, someone (probably a woman) might come up with a way to shift the "experience" of child birth to the male population, for no better reason than to watch those conservative white males' reactions. All things are possible. JAT, with tongue in cheek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frustrated_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why bother?
It's easier just to let you breed and then send your kids off to war, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. You would benefit by learning the word "plurality." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. So, the opposite of "minority" is "plurality"?
I thought the opposite of "minority" was "majority" ...

and then, the "plurality" of the votes - heard that word tossed around a lot when Repukes tried to claim that Clinton won neither the 1992 nor 1996 elections, because he never had the "plurality" of the vote ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Nobody claimed that.
Clinton won '92 and '96 because he had a plurality. They were complaining that he only had a plurality, and never a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Okay, my error on the 92 & 96 "plurality" statements - but -
so, if "whites" become 49.9 percent of the population, they are still the largest group of "ethnics" - because the other 50.1 percent is made up of a bunch of ther "ethnic" groups ...

still, that means that the "whites" haven't been doing their jobs ... keeping up the pace of squirting out kids to keep the "majority" from the other mix ... of course, having to feed that many mouths on one person's salary (wife having to keep home to tend the kids and incubate more) would put them on the fast track to being totally ignored by the conservative Repukes they back ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. It just means
the largest group where there is no true majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Threads like this make me love my racial status
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. Or be in favor of laws assuring protections to minorities
If you're in danger of being one, then why not support affirmative action? You may actually need it one day. Just one example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC