Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baker To Bush: Game Over (Dreyfuss calls ISG a "death blow" to Cheneyism)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:16 PM
Original message
Baker To Bush: Game Over (Dreyfuss calls ISG a "death blow" to Cheneyism)
Too optimistic? I hope not!


http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/11/30/baker_to_bush_game_over.php

Robert Dreyfuss
November 30, 2006



Robert Dreyfuss is an Alexandria, Va.-based writer specializing in politics and national security issues. He is the author of Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam (Henry Holt/Metropolitan Books, 2005), a contributing editor at The Nation, and a writer for Mother Jones, The American Prospect and Rolling Stone. He can be reached through his website, www.robertdreyfuss.com.

Today’s report that the blue-ribbon Iraq Study Group, led by former Secretary of State James Baker, will call for a pullback of American combat forces in Iraq is the beginning of the end of the war in Iraq. Stripped of its diplomatic weasel words, the ISG’s recommendations are a stunning blow to the administration of George W. Bush and everything it stands for. “We had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out,” said one of the ISG’s commission members, according to The New York Times.

Faced with the ISG consensus, backed by a determined Democratic majority in Congress that was catapulted into power by an American electorate sick of the war, President Bush will have no choice but to capitulate. Early in 2007, American troops will start to come home. War-weary, mainstream Republicans, eager to get Iraq off the table before the 2008 elections, will strongly support the ISG’s exit strategy. It marks a sweeping, irreversible change of course for American foreign policy, and a death blow to Vice President Dick Cheney and the remaining, but dwindling population of neoconservatives inside the administration.

Adding insult to injury, the policy will be carried out by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, a former member of the ISG, who will purge the Pentagon of neocons, Rumsfeld loyalists, and assorted other extremists.

The ISG’s decision, which will be officially announced on December 6, represents a formal recognition by the American foreign policy establishment that Bush’s criminally misguided war of aggression in Iraq is lost. A war that was meant to demonstrate to the world the shock and awe of American power is ending as proof positive that the United States is too weak to subdue a fragmented nation of 25 million. A war that was meant to secure a preeminent place for the United States in the oil-rich Persian Gulf is ending with America in full retreat, leaving a shattered Iraq, a resurgent Iran, and a Saudi Arabia that is angry, bitter and disgusted with American bungling. A war that was meant to enhance Israel’s regional might is ending with what is likely, now, to be a reinvigorated push for a diplomatic solution to the Palestinian issue that will come at Israel’s expense—in Syria, in Lebanon, and in the Occupied Territories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's make sure it is not replaced by just a "better managed" war on the
people on Iraq, and instead demand US out of Iraq. And a whole new US policy in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. this is the key, of course-- an entirely new approach to foreign policy...
...in a post-cold war world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forrest Greene Donating Member (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And Let's Remember That
...the Neocons weren't incompetent, they were mistaken. To put it lightly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. neocons were criminal. so yeah, "mistaken" is too soft a term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, they were also incompetent -
but that was their SECOND big problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forrest Greene Donating Member (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, Yes
...they were incompetent, but I shy away from that term. It's too easy to see in that term the implication that if they had performed better in their illegal, unilateral invasion of a sovreign state which posed no immediate threat to the U.S., it would have been alright. It wouldn't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forrest Greene Donating Member (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Criminal, Too
...I'll go along with that. I say "mistaken" because a lot of people back in 2002 seemed to think the Neocon's illegal invasion of Iraq was a pretty good idea. It wasn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R-- next step, war crimes tribunals....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. When did this happen? Bush and Cheney are ignoring the
...Iraq Study Group recommendations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. bush ignores or pays attention to whatever
he's told...

the one pulling the strings this week seems to be cheney.. me thinks there is a war of the puppeteers going on.. and that gives me an idea for a toon...

heeheeheehee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. great let's see it when you finish it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. It hasn't actually been delivered yet. Just leaked.
Dreyfuss shows how the situation has already changed for Bush, beginning with the Democratic gain of Congress, through Gates' replacement of Rumsfeld and now Maliki's snubbing of him in Amman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. TWO! Bring Them Home!
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 03:40 PM by Raster
:kick:TWO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Isn't Gates purging Defense of extremists something like
Stalin purging the Politburo of Stalinists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC