Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

[Globalization] Economic Occupation: The World Bank and IMF in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 02:56 PM
Original message
[Globalization] Economic Occupation: The World Bank and IMF in Iraq
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 02:58 PM by Exiled in America
A note to moderators: this is a very long article. I am sniping out excerpts so that readers can get a feel for the content - its a bit more than four paragraphs only because the entire article is so long.

This is a pretty significant piece that the really provides and excellent case study on how the IMF and World bank frequently work in pretty ugly ways, and it makes that case using what is on everyone's minds these days: Iraq.


Operation Corporate Freedom: The IMF and World Bank in Iraq
By Basav Sen, Mobilization for Global Justice, and Hope Chu, 50 Years is Enough Network

While the three-year U.S. occupation of Iraq faces a quagmire in operations, the economic forces of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are moving full speed ahead implementing various economic reforms that will cause U.S.-based corporations - Bechtel, Halliburton, and others - to proclaim, "Mission Accomplished!" As the Bush administration touts its rhetoric of freedom and liberation, the IMF and World Bank are busily "liberating" Iraq's resources - oil and labor - and "freeing" Iraq's markets. The recent rise in fuel prices in Iraq and the subsequent riots are just a glimpse of what the future holds for Iraq under IMF and World Bank plans.

Stage One: Debt cancellation for Iraq, increased control for the IMF

Shortly after the start of the US occupation of Iraq, the Bush administration sent former Secretary of State James Baker on a pilgrimage to the capitals of other wealthy countries to seek cancellation of Saddam Hussein's odious debts. In a move that seemed inexplicable at first, the Bush administration was using the principle of odious debt to ask for cancellation of Iraq's Saddam Hussein-era debt.

Now, the political motivations behind this unexpected move are clear. The cancellation of Iraq's debt is a Trojan horse for the IMF, World Bank, and WTO to enter Iraq and start restructuring the economy further, continuing where Paul Bremer's Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) left off. In a move reminiscent of the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) program, not only debt but debt relief is being used as a tool to restructure Iraq’s economy.

......

Stage Two: The rule of the Coalition Provisional Authority

......

Stage Three: Economic occupation by the IMF and World Bank

Not content with the extent to which Iraq's economy has already been restructured on neoliberal lines by the U.S., the IMF and World Bank have more designs for the Iraqi economy, and are using debt cancellation as leverage to compel Iraq to comply with their conditions. In addition, they have begun normalizing their relations with Iraq, thereby strengthening their hand in the country.

The IMF made its first-ever loan to Iraq in September 2004. In July 2005, the World Bank made its first loan to Iraq since 1973. This was followed by a $100 million World Bank loan for the education sector last November, and an IMF Standby Arrangement in December. The cancellation of Iraq's debt under the Paris Club plan, referred to earlier, is conditioned on Iraq entering into this Standby Arrangement, and implementing it to the satisfaction of the IMF.

Timing the IMF deal immediately after the elections is a move that appears designed to prevent Iraqis from having a say in the deal. If the deal had been signed before the elections, it would have been an election issue. "The timing of the decision spared politicians from voters' wrath," the Washington Post pointed out in a December 28 story.


Please take a few minutes to really read the full piece here:
http://www.50years.org/cms/updates/story/320

Also, note that at the very bottom there is a copy of a joint statement released by:
General Federation of Iraqi Workers
Oil Unions Federation in Iraq / Basra
Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq
Kurdistan General Workers Syndicate Union / Erbil
Iraqi Kurdistan Workers Syndicate Union

As release statements are not copyrighted, I'll post the statement in its entirety here:


A Joint Statement Concerning the Programs of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in Iraq by Iraqi Trade Unions

The Iraqi economy has been severely affected by decades of sanctions, wars and occupation. The Iraqi trade unions and federations believe in the capacity of the country with all its oil and mineral resources to provide a decent living standard for Iraqis.

The federations and unions consider that the wars and occupation have caused a dramatic decrease in the living and social standards of Iraqis and especially of workers.

The federations and unions stress the importance of complete sovereignty for Iraq over its petroleum and natural resources so as to develop them in a way that assures a complete reconstruction of the country. We wish to stress the following points in regard to the policies of the IMF and World Bank in Iraq:

1. Increasing transparency and additional representation for Iraq in the decision-making structures of the IFIs.

2. To stop imposing structural adjustment conditions for loans.

3. Agreeing to provide funding for public services and state-owned enterprises without demanding their privatization.

4. Canceling debts owed by Iraq that have resulted from the policies of the former regime.

5. Rejecting the reduction of spending on social services especially the elimination of government support for the food distribution system or the reduction of the number of items covered.

6. Strongly rejecting the privatization of publicly owned entities and especially of the oil, education, health, electricity, transportation and construction sectors.

7. Rejecting the increase in the price of petroleum products, considering the negative impact of the increase on the living standards of Iraqis.

8. Adopting a new labor law and a pension and social security law that assure workers' rights and are in conformity with international labor standards and human rights conventions. The World Bank and the IMF must also respect these standards.

The unions and federations that have signed this statement announce the formation of a permanent coordinating committee that will make its positions known to the Iraqi Government and to the IFIs. They also demand that the IFIs engage in dialogue, discussion and negotiations with the trade union federations regarding their policies in Iraq.

Finally, they request the assistance of international trade union organizations to provide all possible support to the above-mentioned demands.

(Signed)

General Federation of Iraqi Workers
Oil Unions Federation in Iraq / Basra
Federation of Workers Councils and Unions in Iraq
Kurdistan General Workers Syndicate Union / Erbil
Iraqi Kurdistan Workers Syndicate Union
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R Great Post.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QuestionAll... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r. will bookmark for later reading.
but off the cuff response to all those who think it's high time for Iraq to take control. Bollocks! They have no control and will never have it and were never meant to have it. Especially when that comb-licking instigator of the war Wolfowitz is now in charge at the Bank.

Piracy and mass murder is what this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. I often worry that what Bush is doing to the U.S. is making it
fodder for the World Bank and IMF.

Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think its the goal, but I think its the effect
American corporations already benefit tremendously from how the World Bank and IMF function, but I fear that Bush's policies are going to drive us to an economic and social collapse that would put us in a prime position to end up a target of one of these "mob loans" the World Bank and IMF like to give developing countries under the term "aid."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What makes you think American corps are the
intended beneficiary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The fact that they are?
Western corporations, of which the united states certainly predominates, are the beneficiaries of IMF and World Banks mob actions on developing countries. The conditions of IMF/World Bank loans include lots and lots of demands that the country in question allow most of its resources to be privatized and taken over by big corps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh, I see.
What you really mean is the same as what I meant: big, multinational corporations who actually HAVE no loyalty to the U.S. even tho they may be based here.

But make no mistake about it: the intended beneficiaries are NOT "American" corporations, but behemoth multinationals. Not unlike Carlyle Group, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. True enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Reboot
upwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kick for an informative read on a Saturday evening. (EOM)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC