Zmolak: Scott, I saw you on TV some time during the war when the US troops were getting kind of bogged down in southern Iraq, and the media was making quite a big noise about your speech that I think you gave in Portugal, saying that the US was going to be leaving Iraq with its tail between its legs, whether you actually meant at the time that the US was not actually going to take Baghdad and sp forth or whether you were talking more about a long-term situation in which the US occupation of Iraq would be a disaster.
Ritter: The statement I made was that the United States would be able to win every tactical invasion it fights, which means every time we go face-to face with an Iraqi military threat, we will prevail. We will prevail on the outskirts of Baghdad, we will prevail in Baghdad, and we will prevail in BAghdad, and we will prevail though out Iraq. But we will lose the war. We will leave Iraq with our tail between our legs. The analogy that I've used many times is that Afghanistan and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, where they were able to successfully take Kabul, take the palace, take every major urban center in Afghanistan, and yet, after nearly ten years, they left Afghanistan with their tail between their legs. They got beat. Because war isn't simply a matter of putting troops on the ground and closing with and destroying the enemy through fire power maneuvering. War is an extension of politics. We have an objective in Iraq of liberating Iraq. You can't liberate a people that don't want to be liberated.
http://traprockpeace.org/RitterTraprockPeace090703.pdfPage 16