Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holy Shite: Was the polonium mechansim of delivery this simple?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:43 PM
Original message
Holy Shite: Was the polonium mechansim of delivery this simple?
Sitting here smoking my cancer sticks and working on trying to figure out the polonium drama (if you don't know what I mean, go to www.atlargely.com) and I realized the following... going to post from my blog:

"My theory on the mechanism:

I have said before that I believe that the Polonium was not directly ingested by Alex, but was rather in something belonging to him or something that he used was laced with the polonium. But remember, you want to use one weapon against several people, and you don't want to use too much as it may be identified. What kind of delivery mechanism could both be undetected, potent, transmittable, and have the ability to cause so much confusion in terms of the evidence trail?

If Mario is not involved, but contaminated, what did he share with Alex and when? The same question applies to Alex's wife. What was it, a cup? No, because Mario did not go home to visit Alex's family.

How about this:

A cigarette. In fact, a cigarette would be an extremely powerful way to distribute the polonium via air, causing another to inhale it. But since the only people that would inhale for any real duration would be people in close proximity to the victim, it is certain to do the trick as smoking at most places is not allowed and also because in small vapor qualities it would not be necessarily lethal, so not too much of a danger to the British public, although somewhat of a danger if things went badly.

Let us then assume the polonium was brought into England by several agents, all bringing in cigarettes cartons. That would explain why an overhead was contaminated as well as a seat on a particular flight.

Imagine Alex going about his day, smoking. Meeting Mario for lunch, who only inhaled some of the poison. This would also account for some of the radiation sites that do not have a bodily fluid deposit, like urine for example. Most importantly, It would also account for the delayed reaction in Mario and also Alex's wife, because if they are non-smokers, they would not have directly ingested the Polonium, rather, they would have inhaled it. Alex, however, would have directly ingested it, both via his mouth and via inhalation, speeding up his death. The more he smoked, the worse it got, which might account for why there are places that are more contaminated than others and also out of order of his movements."
http://www.atlargely.com/2006/12/alex_smoking_gu.html

Now I have to see if this pans out via atomic experts, but this would be one hell of a dangerous weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does anybody know why this story is getting so much coverage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What do you mean? You really don't understand why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not at all. This story hit right after the guy died, without
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 05:56 PM by BuyingThyme
even any indication that he was murdered. They've been adding to it non-stop ever since. If a retired U.S. senator had died, he would have gotten less attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Not true. The story came out when the guy ended up in the hospital
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 06:17 PM by in_cog_ni_to
and he suspected Putin poisoned him. That's when it made the news. He died days after, maybe a week after he was hospitalized. THEN, the day AFTER he died, the hospital discovered it was POLONIUM 210! Not everyone has access to Polonium. This was a hit job on him and he's probably correct in suspecting Putin.

I heard a scientist say that all it takes to kill someone with Polonium 210 is an amount that fits on the TIP of a PIN. :scared: It's fascinating as hell. Now they've discovered 12 radioactive sites and 2 more victims? :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. In my world, the top-of-the hour radio news hits
started with the death, and they've constantly added to it.

There were two days where this story was the lead, almost every single hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
68. "… at a total cost of about $1 million - to have a toxic amount."

You would need about 15,000 of our Polonium-210 needle sources at a total cost of about $1 million - to have a toxic amount.

Another point to keep in mind is that an order for 15,000 sources would look a tad suspicious, considering we sell about 1 or 2 sources every 3 months.

http://www.unitednuclear.com/isotopes.htm

This is some expensive poison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
57. Take Wellstone's plane going down. Gosh - they got rid of
That story quickly.

True there were follow ups when the National Transportaion Board issued their findings, but news media paid little notice to many truly remarkable things aout the crash- including the fact that the head of that board had at one time been CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Because it is fairly rare...
for someone to be assassinated in such a total James Bond way. Fucking Polonium? WTF! That is like crazy super-spy stuff that only happens in movies, tv and books. Most assassinations are small and quiet, natural causes are what you usually want. Or big and lound.

This was --- in a word, weird. It is so specific that it has to either be Putin or someone who very badly wants to make it look like Putin did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, what you said.
And I'm a skeptic about pointing fingers until real proof's in... but having said that, this is far from normal.

It's just that Putin's considered so evil that he cannot but be guilty in the popular mind.. which makes me think that regardless of whether he's behind it or not, it looks very convenient, and very easy, to stir the media up to use this against Putin. When a lie is as good as the truth (maybe better), I suspect stories.

But absolutely, this was a weird case, the likes of which hasn't been seen in a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. They were pounding this story before the polonium
showed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Well, the media is usually concerned
about their fellow journalists being murdered. The spy who was killed was investigating Putin's role in the murder of a Russian journalist very critical of Putin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Only when it suits the corporate media's agenda
How many times have you seen CNN go into 'breaking news mode' when a journalist was killed by US forces in Iraq?

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0218/dailyUpdate.html?s=rel

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yeah, well they are not..
going to bite the hand that feeds them. In general though, they care about their fellow journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. That's because he said PUTIN did it.
That's why it made the news before the Polonium entered the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Spies are big stories when they are a.) outed [cf. "Plame, Valerie"];
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 06:30 PM by WinkyDink
b.) poisoned after threatening to reveal major "worse than corruption" activities of a world leader; 3.) assassinated via RARE NUCLEAR-WEAPON MATERIAL!

And right when the latest James Bond movie premieres?

You're seriously wondering why this is a story??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. My first thought was your second guess-
someone who very badly wants to make it look like Putin did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nannah Donating Member (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. the larouche folks think it was cheney
they say it is cheney trying to make putin look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Well, he does like to kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. not only was it not done in a way that seemed like natural causes....
...but the polonium, apparently, can only be obtained through very limited sources, like a govt.

There aren't a lot of places where you can just walk in and buy polonium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
65. It seems the FSB (KGB) is overt about its assassinations
(contrary to the US intel agencies) maybe they're trying to send a clear message to those they haven't yet gotten to.


Alexander Litvinenko, former FSB agent, accused FSB of being behind the 1999 terrorist attacks, asylum in UK, died due to radio-active poisoning november 2006
http://www.guardian.co.uk/russia/article/0,,1956643,00.html

Anna Politkovskaja, Journalist critical of Putin and the war in Chechenia, shot dead in Moscow okt 2006
http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article1819666.ece

Sergej Joesjenkov, Parlementarian investigating the 1999 terrorist attacks implicating the FSB, shot dead in Moscow april 2003
http://archief.trouw.nl/artikel?REC=7e619e0671cfa2d5c5f5efe6a91bf45d

Joeri Sjtsjekotsjichin, Parlementarian and journalist investigating the 1999 terrorist attacks, died due to misterious desease juli 2003
http://archief.nieuws.nl/zoekresultaat/86321

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Because it implies that a global superpower is carrying out political assassinations on foreign soil
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 05:50 PM by JohnLocke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hmm....you mean like we do?
Damn...can't have that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. right, but add to that
a bio-nuke attack on our most important friend's soil... the Brits... this is seriously disturbing on so many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Even worse- like we do, but with STYLE!
This was DESIGNED to grab headlines. Bond movie fans alone
would provide enough word-of-mouth to circle the globe.

This was not just an assasination, it was a MESSAGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I suspect becausethe guy was poisoned buy a very unusual method.
One that scares lots of people, and no one seems to be able to figure out the source. It seems to have originated in Russia, and they sure aren't know for theirability or desire to secure radioactive materials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Nuclear and chemical WMDs in a terrorist attack.
It'd be much bigger news if a muslim nation were suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yes and no
The target would have to be different.

The spy who was killed was a rabid anti-Putin guy. (Not disparaging him here, but his death bed words blamed Putin) He was investigating Putin for murdering journalists. Then he was assassinated super-spy anime cartoon style by a weapon easily traced back to Putin.

That makes it big news.

Yes, if the Polonium were traceable to say, Iran and the victim were say, an ex-Syrian spy who saying damaging things about Iran and Syria, yes it would be a bigger story, no doubt eclipsing this one's coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Tinfoil Alert: Imagine how much more effective a London "dirty bomb"...
attack would be now...

:tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Because it is a real life mystery, a bizarre method of death.
I guess you have to have kind of a strange mind to
be interested in it I admit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. It seems plausable...
especially since cigarettes already contain background radioactive materials anyway. The question is, do cigs have enough background rads to mask someone transporting them onto a plane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
70. No, they wouldn't.
Edited on Sat Dec-02-06 04:54 PM by skids
The only reason the trace amounts of Polonium 210 in normal U.S. cigarettes (and captured by cigarette smoke in Radon-high areas like cellars) is a health hazard is because it gets deposited right where it can do the most damage -- on a precancerous leision right next to some cells that it can irradiate... and that takes years to kill a person.

Alpha radiation is only effective at very short range, like down on the cellular level.

If you want to kill someone in a shirt time period you have to get them to inhale many many times that amount, or if you are not using an inhaled delivery mechanism like a cigarette, many many times even more of it. The levels of the Polonium 210 would have to be so high, so close to the cells, that they kill lots of cells outright, not just mutate a few every few weeks.

(EDIT: if you wanted to give a person to smoke a poisoned cigarette and have them die a few days later, there would probably be easier poisons to use, unless you really wanted it to stand out as peculiar, to which end there are plenty of ways than using radioactive materials. From the bits and peices I've bothered to look at in this story I'm guessing it was ingested.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Polonium is a component implicated in lung cancer.
Polonium is a component implicated in lung cancer.

http://nepenthes.lycaeum.org/Drugs/THC/Health/cancer.rad.html "The major source of the polonium is phosphate fertilizer, which is used in growing tobacco".

http://www.lenntech.com/Periodic-chart-elements/Po-en.htm "The Surgeon General C. Everett Koop stated that radioactivity, rather than tar, accounts for at least 90% of all smoking-related lung cancers. The Center for Disease Control concluded "Americans are exposed to far more radiation from tobacco smoke than from any other source. Cigarette smoking accounts for 30% of all cancer deaths."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Reasonable.
How was it carried? Sure, the cigs could have been doped anywhere. In Russia or in the UK. But either way the Polonium had to be transported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. It's an alpha emitter, it can be carried in a paper bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Can it be carried in a paper bag and not be detected in an airport? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. I doubt it.
If only because the process of putting it in the bag would have left a tiny amount on the outside of the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Well, since it was found on 2 planes in an overhead
that means it was a carry-on bag and would have gone through detectors. Right? OR the person would have gone through a detector if he was contaminated with it...either way, the detectors missed it or it was an inside job with an airport worker who let the Polonium go through. Strange and fascinating spy story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Well, right.
There are still plenty of stories going around about people sneaking actual guns onto airplanes. I'm saying polonium should be detectable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. The airport did not detect it. I don't think it was an inside job.
Someone just carried it onboard.

Can't they look at the passenger list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Okay, I just looked up 'alpha emitter' on another site
It says: "Polonium-210 is an alpha emitter. During radioactive decay, it loses two protons, and becomes a lead-206 atom, which is stable (i.e., nonradioactive)."

Does "nonradioactive" mean it can't pass through the skin but is still dangerous if inhaled or ingested? The terms are confusing me. I thought I knew what "nonradioactive" meant. Like I would have said I'm nonradioactive. (Mostly.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. It means the lead-206 doesn't decay.
So the end product is no longer radioactive (nonradioactive.) The Polonium-210 is still radioactive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Ah, thank you.
I get it now, whatever hasn't yet decayed is still dangerous. I'm not switched on tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Well, the lead's still poisonous.
There's no guarantee the non-radioactive daughter species isn't dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #47
61. Lead is still poisonous
A good friend if mine died of lead poisioning...... .38 caliber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
45. I have read it does not pass thru the skin. Must be ingested or inhaled.
You can hold it in your hand for a short period of time and still be OK,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. That's what I heard from a scientist. It has to be ingested and is not contagious
Edited on Fri Dec-01-06 08:24 PM by in_cog_ni_to
unless someone comes in contact with urine, feces, or bodily fluid of some sort. I guess the wife kissing him would explain her being positive? The other guy, I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #51
66. Yes ingested or inhaled.....
I don't get the other guy either, unless it was a cigarette delivery method..smoke inhaled by the other guy..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. I think I'll pass on that
I never was much for dares! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #56
67. I don't blame you....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. What was your reasoning that he didn't directly ingest the polonium?
I haven't actually seen details of what surfaces have had polonium found on them. If it's an entire room, your smoke theory could make sense. But "seat and overhead locker" sounds like contamination from someone's hands - which has nothing particular to do with cigarette cartons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
46. I think he was trying to account for all the traces in differing locales...
if he ingested it, would only be in his urine etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. i think he did ingest it... via the cig in his mouth
washed down with saliva. the surfaces have been anything ranging in a potty (for bodily fluids) to the overhead in a plane. as for the seat and overhead, that makes sense too, because one of the carrier bags was ripped or leaking i think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. In the movie, "The Enemy Within", the character played by
Lawrence Pressman was murdered when an agent carrying a lit cigar waved the smoke in the other man's face. His death was ruled a heart attack - which the poison used could produce.

In the movie, the comment was made that such a technique was an "old Russian" method.

Of course it's just a movie.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. Interesting. And Putin is EX-KGB.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. I know it is a stupid question but did he smoke.
If so did he like one Russian brand.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. If the answer to both of those questions is yes
then I think LaLa hit the nail on the glowing head. Now, it's time to find out if anyone else would have been near him when he was smoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. that's a very likely scenario..........
In fact, I read something that says cigarettes already contain some polonium.......


Lives could be saved by simply changing fertilizers, they say... Almost 95% of the Lung Cancer caused by Cigarettes are allegedly the result of using calcium phosphate fertilizer to grow the Tobacco. The resulting Cigarettes bearing a combination of local Radon gasses and radioactive Polonium from the Tobacco leaves deposit a small dose of radioactive isotopes directly into a smoker's lungs as they smoke (or breath smoke laden air)! For the "pack-a-day" smoker, it has been alleged that this dose would be the same as if you were forced to have between 300 and 8000 Chest X-Rays a year! If this startling fact be true, then it appears that your Lungs could literally be converted into a toxic, irradiated Nuclear Dump by the majority of today's commercially grown and factory manufactured Cigarettes!


http://www.acsa.net/HealthAlert/lungcancer.html

Assuming this is true, they would only have to increase the amount of polonium for it to be effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
43. Makes a lot of sense. Scary if true. How easy to smuggle and
administer the poison.

BTW Could the wife have gotten poisoned thru sexual contact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. i assume you mean
seman? good question...but the obvious question with that is rather disrespectful to them, so i won't ask it... but given the two criteria through which this enters the body, there would be only one way she could get it that way and only if she did a particular thing... i don't know, however, but good question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
49. Update, ciggies already have P in them
http://www.lenntech.com/Periodic-chart-elements/Po-en.htm

So that also gives the weapon a cover, should any of the cigs be located.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Holy crapola! Scary stuff. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. Readers Digest had an article 40 years or so ago--
--which reported that tobacco plants concentrate trace heavy metals from fertilizer, some of which are radioactive. Looks like modern research with actual URLs agrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
53. I think you might be on to the answer here
Makes lots of sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. thanks
love your flower by the way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-01-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
59. I'll K&R this.
Just stay off of Putinworld's radar, okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
60. There are a bunch of threads at firedoglake.com today writing about the
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
62. yeah, his WIFE was exposed but was not at the lunch with Mario
that would explain why she had exposure and was not at lunch with the exposed Italian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
63. Quite few leaps there. But nice imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. what leaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
69. The idea that second hand smoke would not be enough to contaminate others.
I think many more people would be sick from the second hand smoke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-03-06 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. People did get sick from 2nd hand smoke
from the OP: "..would also account for the delayed reaction in Mario and also Alex's wife..."

So you went from "quite a few leaps" to "i think there's one leap" - which turns out not to be a leap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #71
72. I gave you one. Thought you might be able to read more critically on your own.
It is a huge leap to assume the rate of contamination and toxicity of the second-hand smoke laced with the poison. Can you think of any other ways his wife might come in contact with the poison?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC