|
The neoconservative invasion of Iraq is one of the worst strategic blunders in human history.
Napoleon's invasion of Russia was wise and brilliant compared to this. In fact, it makes the US in the Vietnam War look noble.
That it was to be a long-term disaster was obvious from the start. Neoconservative designs on Iraq were long term and had nothing to do with Saddam, terrorism, weapons of mass destruction or bringing democracy to the oppressed Iraqi people. The design was colonial; post-Saddam Iraq was initially governed by that great Iraqi statesman, Jerry Bremer, playing the role of a legendary lawgiver and decreeing Iraq's economy open for private foreign investment. The neoliberal paradigm that is rejected by voters in Latin America was imposed on the people of Iraq by force of arms. The only way that paradigm could be maintained is by continued foreign occupation. Bush would have to keep US troops there indefinitely in order for his corporate crony pigs to continue feed at Iraq's trough. Whether Iraq would be governed by an American governor general or by native puppets made little difference; the military-economic structure of neoconservative Iraq would look like the British Raj in India. Occupation was the real goal and there could be no exit strategy.
As for the civil war in Iraq, it would be wrong to blame Bush and the neoconservatives for it directly. If Saddam had died quietly in bed in March 2003 there would have been a civil war in Iraq. It wouldn't have played out quite the same way, but it would have happened. What is fair is holding Bush and his aides accountable for dismissing the idea that this was any sort of possibility and being completely unprepared for it.
The invasion of Iraq has set that back years the goal, even if the merely stated goal, of making the US and its "interests" safe from terrorism. Prior to the invasion, Zarqawi was in Iraq, but had difficulty setting off firecrackers. After the invasion, he was allied with al Qaida and setting off IEDs. Prior to the invasion, there were no active international terrorists in Iraq; what presence there is of international terrorists in Iraq has come about since the invasion. After all, international like lawless, chaotic environments, like Lebanon in the 1980s, Afghanistan in the 1990s and Iraq today. There's no one there to stop them from training future terrorists or operate in relative freedom.
Meanwhile, resources were diverted from Afghanistan that were used there to fight real terrorists who posed an immediate and real threat to the American people. Instead of rebuilding Afghanistan into a reasonably modern state that would be stable and prosperous enough to keep al Qaida from operating within its borders, there is now open talk of bringing al Qaida's old allies, the Taliban, back into the government.
Often, officials of the Bush regime or demagogues like Newt Gingrich remind Americans that we could see another September 11 and give that as a reason to keep neoconservatives in power. I, too, am fearful of another September 11; to me, that is a reason why Bush and Cheney should be removed from office as soon as possible and neoconservatism buried with a stake through its heart. Bush and his neoconservative aides are incompetent, deceitful, cynical, tyrannical, elitist, megalomaniacal and inept. They are a danger to Americans and to all people.
|