Adenoid_Hynkel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:20 PM
Original message |
Who will be the great progressive hope of 2008? |
|
Biden, Hillary and Vilsack are rightwingers and don't excite me
Kerry is a nice guy, but an inept campaigner and won't get the nomination Feingold says no Edwards? maybe Clark? dunno Obama? I don't think he'll run this soon, but maybe
Gore? wish it were so, but he says no.
--- So unless we want to be stuck with the DLC's nominee getting entrenched as the front runner, we need to draft someone and fast. is it time to deluge gore with a flood of mail begging him?
or as someone else has suggested, how about dean? he's been proven right a thousand times over
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
1. In what possible world are Biden, Clinton, or Vilsack "rightwingers?" |
|
They might be more moderate than you'd like, but that hardly makes them "rightwingers."
|
Adenoid_Hynkel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. they voted for the war and are DLC |
|
the country's gone so far to the right that it needs a left turn and not some career politician triangulating the party out of an identity while sitting on the GOP's mess
clinton tried that. it came back to haunt us all with chmpy
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. so much misinformation about the DLC. I'll let you figure out what part of your post... |
|
... isn't true. The rest of it is, of course, you entitled opinion.
|
Adenoid_Hynkel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
22. one key element is factually untrue |
|
Edited on Sun Dec-03-06 01:09 PM by wyldwolf
Biden is not DLC.
The rest, I'm sure, is merely your perspective.
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Economically conservative, pro-war, pro-military, pro-free trade, socially moderate... |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-02-06 11:53 PM by Spider Jerusalem
They're certainly more right than left. The American political spectrum is heavily skewed to the right; this creates distortions of public perception where anyone who's to the left of Barry Goldwater is now considered a "liberal". Even the most left-leaning of the Democrats whose names are often floated as potential national candidates is at best centre-right politically.
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I'll agree that our political center is shifted rightward from the rest of the world |
|
However, in a political context that includes the modern Republican party, it's absurd to call those three "right-wingers."
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
Just because the current Republican Party now represents radical right-wing extremism doesn't mean that Democrats like Hillary, or Biden, etc., aren't also right of centre, even if moderately so instead of nearly at the far edge of the scale.
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. In a global sense, maybe. |
|
Even if they are right of center in a global sense, it doesn't make much sense to refer to them in that scope.
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Because the issues that make them right of centre as the political centre is defined everywhere and not JUST in the US are ALSO issues of GLOBAL and not only AMERICAN significance: trade, war and military intervention, et cetera.
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. None of which changes that they are running in the American political system |
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. And America is one of the most right-wing countries on the planet. |
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Maybe if by "on the planet" you mean "compared to Europe," but otherwise I think you're wrong.
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Compared to Europe, Oceania, most of Latin and South America... |
|
America is certainly one of the most right-wing of the so-called "developed nations".
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Man, I would love to see Howard Dean run for president again. |
|
But he's made a commitment to the DNC and I suspect he'll live up to it.
Gimmie Gore, PLEASE gimmie Gore.
|
vote 4 democracy
(115 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message |
5. We need to flood Gore with pleas for a return to sanity n/t |
southerncrone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I still am angry at Kerry for conceding so quickly in light of closeness of 2004, seemed turn-coat to me. Obama too green. Someone made the comment on TV the other day that he only beat out Allan Keyes so far. Needs more experience. But seems like terrific future hopeful. Clark or Edwards or Dean, maybe someone altogether new. I really don't want to see anyone from Yale, quite frankly, because if they conferred a degree on the shrub, their program can have NOOOOOOOOO INTEGRITY! Plus the "Skull & Bones" shadow.:thumbsdown:
|
PassingFair
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 11:41 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I'm NOT a huge fan....but my "spidey senses" say |
|
Edwards.
I think he miscalculated last time. He won't flub again.
Hope he spends more money on speech writers this time around though.
The "Ma Daddy was a mill worker" schtick got BORING real fast.
It was powerful the FIRST time, but by ROUND 47, my eyes were literally ROLLING BACK IN MY HEAD.
:eyes:
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Don't get your hopes up our nominee in 08 will be |
|
In the moderate to Conservative bracket, I'd bet money on it.
|
Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message |
17. When did Gore ever say "no"? He didn't. |
|
"I'm not planning on it, but I haven't ruled it out" is VERY far from "No, I won't run."
The attempts of many DUers to spin this as a firm statement are laughable.
|
ToeBot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
18. I would hope that Gore can be persuaded to run. |
|
He is the only potential candidate that generates any enthusiasm in me, and having won the office once, he deserves it. I suppose I could drag my ass to the polls to vote for Edwards, but as for the rest? They can hang, I'm tired of being played.
|
NuttyFluffers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 01:14 AM
Response to Original message |
20. look in the mirror. you've always been your greatest hope! |
|
O8) :hippie:
oh wait, that's not the answer you're looking for...
|
salin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
Lusted4
(558 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
24. America needs more, GIVE GORE FOUR. America needs more, GIVE GORE FOUR. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:19 PM
Response to Original message |