Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheap Labor vs. Population Control?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ciggies and coffee Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:32 AM
Original message
Cheap Labor vs. Population Control?

I overheard a discussion the other day and I was wondering if anyone
can make sense of this.

Are the super-rich in favor of population control, directly or indirectly?

Are the rich folks who dream to be super-rich in favor of cheap labor?

Any comments are appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
selfdestructive Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Are the rich folks who dream to be super-rich in favor of cheap labor?"

LOL....
i'm sorry but i just couldn't resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Every breathing being is another consumer and potential $0.20/hr worker.
What's not to like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ciggies and coffee Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. True. The real question is whether there is a line where...

..gaining power for your class and controlling competition for natural resources becomes a
greater priority than cheaper labor/more money made from consumers (Those two sort of
contradict each other BTW-cheaper labor has less money to spend on stuff).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Rightwing Henry Ford's "$5.00 a day" pay -- He needed consumers.
Edited on Mon Dec-04-06 01:14 AM by Bozita
And his workers consumed ... an awful lot of cars.

And America changed.

Old Henry wasn't much schooled, but he had a better grasp of economics than the folks working in the White House today.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. I bet they do favor population control...
Or they will if they don't now. Human life will devalue. As supply increases, demand will decrease, and demand will radically increase for foods, open lands, resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crandor Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. and they'll be the only ones able to afford them
Why do you think the right wing keeps attacking abortion and even birth control? Certainly not because they want to keep population down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Why do you think they keep putting suppressing safety, healthcare, welfare
for children while simultaneously backing free and open markets for dangerous products like cigarettes? This argument goes both ways. But the things you bring up are mostly fundy Christian causes, not pushed by corporate pukes...Therefore after 6 years of TOTAL republican control of SCOTUS, congress and whitehouse birth control and abortions are still safe and legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crandor Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's not just a religious right thing
most "libertarians" want to ban abortion too. And when it comes to birth control, they always defend attempts to withhold it by saying that in a free market nobody is forced to sell something (while omitting the obvious fact that in a free market, sellers wouldn't need a pharmacy license to sell it in the first place).

Yep, they do love to cut things that save lives... but in the grand scheme of things I think the effect on population is quite small. Cigarettes in particular, tend to kill you later on, after you're out of the labor force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It pretty much is, really.
The official stance of the Libertarian party is to support choice, and I'm sure that they support birth control...they are the party of legalized prostitution and drugs, so I can't see them freaking out it.

Regarding cigarettes and so forth I don't know, really. I do think smoking really cuts into labor productivity, but to be frank I don't think they NEED american labor at all at this point, its just for show to prevent vast poverty and revolution. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. The "ownership class" wants cheap workers who can't or won't vote.
"Guest" workers, undocumented migrants, H1B, and disenfranchised ex-felons (we have the biggest bumper crop in the world) are their ideal. Education? No ... worker training is all that's needed. None of that "liberal" stuff in our schools!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kiouni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. they just want white teenagers
and tons of them. Is how it sounds to me.

Don't raise the minimum wage because the only ones making that are high school students!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC