Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why should someone swear an oath of office on a book

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 04:55 PM
Original message
Why should someone swear an oath of office on a book
That means absolutely nothing to him?
What type of message is that?
If he doesn't believe in the Bible...then swearing in on it would be like a believer swearing in on a dime store novel. No meaning whatsoever.
But better than that--no reason to uphold the promise he is making when swearing in.
Personally, I would rather he make a promise on something that is dear to HIM. Otherwise it is relegated to simply a meaningless gesture when it should mean everything.
Just my .02.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would rather they look me in the eye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. because people are superstitious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, we can't expect them to pledge
what the signers of the Declaration of Independence did. How many of todays politicians would even have "sacred honor" to put on the line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. An unfortunate awareness of the origin or words
To testify used to mean to swean on your testies. Thats where the word comes from. You swore on your balls. If it was found out you were lying.... you get the picture. There are even passages in the bible demonstrating this practice.

As we became more ... civilized... the focus of this oath shifted from something very important to us in a physical sense to something more important in a less substantial sense.

To get this you really have to understand how Judeo/Christian religion was different than the other religions of its day. Most other religions were an amalgamation of verbal stories and local customs. But Judaism introduced the idea of text forming the foundation of a particular teaching. This made it very easy to establish lines of authority. Christianity adopted this from its founding religion and expanded upon it. The text became vested with increasing degrees of authority over time. Eventually the texts exchanged amongst fellow Christians began to take on similar value to the Jewish texts and were included in this authority. Letters from teachers and leaders took on the value of doctrine.

Eventually these texts were assembled by the Council of Nicea and given the full weight of moral authority. Essentially voting the particular collection of works to be special or holy. And since they swore to its truth it took on the name of Testiment. Which carried with it all the implications of the origins of that word.

Which all is a round about way of saying that swearing on the bible is sort of like swearing on your balls. Which of course also explains why women were not allowed to testify for so long. No balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. They shouldn't.
And I'm getting more and more angry with those who voice the opinion that Keith Ellison is somehow wrong to prefer taking his oath on the Koran.

Don't these people understand the concept of "no religious test" for any elected official? Why is that so hard to get? Who are these people that think there is some American "rule" about using the Bible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. I propose that all members of Congress swear on a copy of
Tom Sawyer. After they turn around and spit. I am series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. There is no requirement that holders of public office swear an oath
on any book, religious or otherwise.

It is the constitution that they are supposed to be defending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Keep in mind that the purpose of an oath is to risk something
There are all sorts of ways people have tried to ascertain if someone was telling the truth or not. Swearing on testies (see my post above) and worse methods have been used. The Japanese would place a red hot sword on a person's tongue briefly to see if they were lying.

The idea of an oath is based on risk aversion notions. The idea is to place a person in a position where they fear losing something rather than lying. It used to be things like tongues and testies. But Christianity introduced the idea of the soul. And many are taught that risking your soul is the greatest risk of all. So the fear should motivate them to tell the truth.

Course that has no effect on someone that doesn't happen to believe in the bible or a soul. Which causes many believers a lot of consternation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FtWayneBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have heard tell of swearing on one's mother's eyes.
Some swear by "cross my heart and hope to die."

Here's a thought, for those swearing to uphold The Constitution of The United States of America - Swear on that Sacred Document.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think they should swear on the Constitution
It contains the laws they are supposed to uphold and the belief system they are supposed to be loyal to as public servants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Politicians are not sworn into office with one hand on the bible. They raise
their hand and take the oath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC