Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MoJoBlog: SCOTUS to hear "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 07:33 AM
Original message
MoJoBlog: SCOTUS to hear "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case
A transcript of this case won't do. I need to see a video of Ruth Bader Ginsberg and John Roberts debating "Bong Hits 4 Jesus".

From MoJo:
Supreme Court to Consider "Bong Hits 4 Jesus"

Oh boy. I really can't wait for the transcript of this Supreme Court case. The Supes have agreed to hear a First Amendment case involving an Alaska teen who was suspended for unfurling a banner reading "Bong Hits 4 Jesus." The student says he did it as a prank to try to get on TV, but his principal said he'd violated the school rules by promoting drug use. (I guess promoting religion didn't work in his favor.) An appeals court sided with the kid, declaring that his free-speech rights were violated. But the school—represented by Kenneth Starr—has appealed to the Supreme Court. Serious questions of free expression aside, I think it's safe to say this will be the first time the phrase "bong hits" will be uttered in those hallowed halls (any SCOTUS watchers out there know otherwise?). If ever a Supreme Court hearing deserved its own drinking game, this is it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Justice Thomas: "Did you put a pubic hair in my bong?" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know that much about the case
If the kid was on school grounds, or was at the parade under school supervision or on a school activity, the school was right to issue consequences.

If the kid was there on his own time and not on school property, than it would only be a problem if he was violating some city ordinance, and in that case, it would be on the city police to address the issue, not the school officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. My son and I heard about this case on the radio yesterday
and according to the morning jocks on his favored rock station , the ultimate source of absolute truth (/sarcasm), the banner was displayed on private property adjacent to and visible from the school.

This case will be a riot though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC