Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Can You Hear Me Now?", is the title of a piece written on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 05:37 PM
Original message
"Can You Hear Me Now?", is the title of a piece written on
ABC's blog, The Blotter. Written by: Vic Walter and Krista Kjellman it informs you how easy it is for the FBI to use your cell phone to listen in on your Conversations, even when you're not on the phone!
Link: http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/

"CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?"

"Cell phone users, beware. The FBI can listen to everything you say, even when the cell phone is turned off.

A recent court ruling in a case against the Genovese crime family revealed that the FBI has the ability from a remote location to activate a cell phone and turn its microphone into a listening device that transmits to an FBI listening post, a method known as a "roving bug." Experts say the only way to defeat it is to remove the cell phone battery.

"The FBI can access cell phones and modify them remotely without ever having to physically handle them," James Atkinson, a counterintelligence security consultant, told ABC News. "Any recently manufactured cell phone has a built-in tracking device, which can allow eavesdroppers to pinpoint someone's location to within just a few feet," he added.

...snip...

At least I know all I have to do is holler for help if I need it...right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need to find a way...
to use the phone without the battery....or does that make any sense at all. Eh, I'm not suprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. "recently manufactured"
How recent, I wonder?

There are advantages to staying with old equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Probably within the last 18-24 months. Cell phones are now
required to have the locater in them because of 9-1-1 calls. Most 911 districts/counties/parishes(in Louisiana)have Phase I capability. This lets the calltaker know what tower you are hitting and gives them a call back number. Phase II which is very spotty, depending on where you live in the U.S. gives you location within 150 meters (I think). Phase III, if anyone has it other than the Government I don't know, gives the calltaker your location within a few feet.
Cellphone makers had deadlines to meet because the phase deployment that were to be met.
They did, local governments couldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. so... if the CIA can do it, why shouldn't anyone else be able to figure it out?
Edited on Tue Dec-05-06 06:07 PM by nashville_brook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC