Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One Gay Dad's Take on Mary Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:47 AM
Original message
One Gay Dad's Take on Mary Cheney
I am a gay parent of two daughters, ages 9 and 11. My partner and I co-parent with two women, so the kids have two moms and two dads.

My feeling about Mary Cheney has nothing to do with her orientation, and everything to do with political hypocrisy.

This woman SUPPORTED candidates who declared WAR on my family for nothing but political gain. Like GW Bush during Viet Nam, her family provided a cloak of protection, so she - like GW - was safe from the real dangers of the war their families supported. Her money alone can protect her from some of the worst grievances other families face.

My disdain for anti gay fundies is only exceeded by my disdain for those like the Cheney family, who know better, but serve the religious right.

So fuck you Mary Cheney, and your asshole parents as well.

Since Mary supported politicians who USED MY FAMILY as a pawn in their game, I have NO problem using hers. But the big difference is that while I'm more than willing to call her hypocrisy, I'd still fight for her equal civil rights.

And that's a far cry better than I ever got from her or her family.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R - from another gay dad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll K&R to that
Fuck you, Mary Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. HYpocrasy runs deep in the Cheney family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep, I'll kick and recommend as well.
It IS all about hypocrisy, supporting people who have declared gay people as second rate citizens, not worthy of the same rights as everyone else.

Fuck you, Mary Cheney.

And you might want to watch the movie Rosemary's Baby for some insight as to what lies ahead for you. Anything born into such a detestable family cannot come from anything good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LilyLibber Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Proud to be #5
The depth and breadth of the Cheney hypocrisy blows my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R. I abhor the arrogance of the Cheney family
Surely, with their connections and wealth, they will never know the inequities which my family deals with every day.
I hope Heather Noe realizes what she is getting in to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'm reminded of people who want to make abortion illegal, knowing they
can always fly out of the country to get an unwanted pregnancy taken care of if they need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
47. We have people making laws
knowing they won't apply to *them*. Money fixes everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. likewise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. the person who will really suffer from this
is the child who is born to Mary Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Then shouldn't we discuss only the hypocrisy and not the pregnancy.
You know what I'm saying. I'm happy they are having a baby but I hate her politics of hate. So lets keep the pregnancy out of the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But her pregnancy IS important. She has supported a war on gay families
while having one herself - but she will not be touched by the war she supported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I don't think it is fair to say she won't be touched by the war....I can't imagine
that they are to warmly accepted to places without their father in attendance.

Plus hearing what they say about them...must be tough knowing they have to support it with silence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Respectfully, I disagree. She has the resources to work around
what many gay families have to deal with every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. I can understand what you're saying. But how does she work around hate?
Because of money? Name? True. But then that means anyone with money and a name can do it whether or not they were republican or not.

I'm hoping that this debate inadvertently takes the debate to their faces and forces them to either accept one of their own or toss her and her partner and the kid out on their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Enough money can protect you from a lot. And hate only bothersyou if you let it.
I don't really give a shit who hates me. I care about my rights.

Sorry if I sound pissed at you - I don't mean to, and I'm not feeling cranky with you AT ALL. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Hey. I don't read any thing in your posts that sound like you're pissed.
I enjoyed our discussion.

Plus it is everyone kick lil boots in the teeth day. I'm celebratin and high as a kite happy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Xultar, that's the part that gets me annoyed...
They -don't- have to "support it with silence".

Would speaking out be easy? No. Not only would the fundamentalist Christians -still- hate them, but there's a chance that their family would disown them.

Oh well.

I won't disparage the choice they made; I haven't walked a mile in their shoes. However, I'll be dammned if I feel sorry for them even a minute. Sure, their bed is uncomfortable, but it's the one they chose to make. You know as well as I (probably better, even) that there are thousands of gay couples who are far worse off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. she is only in the news now cos of the pregnancy. i however have a long standing hatred of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Her pregnancy needs to be at the center of the debate
From stem cell research to marriage benefits to child custody laws and more. For many gay families, this pregnancy IS the key to all of those debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. She's a typical "as long as I get mine" Republican
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 10:59 AM by Strawman
As the Vice President's daughter she's off-limits to these hate mongers. She can do what she wants basically and doesn't care that others like herself cannot. "Screw everyone else as long as I get mine." In a way this resolves the seeming contradiction and makes her a qunitessential Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hypocrisy always leads to injustice.
I hate injustice. People with money and power bullying people with none is not the way the world shoud work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. Also K&R
I only hope her pregnancy causes a bunch of anti-gay heads to explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. I understand your anger, but...
I'm never comfortable with kids being caught in the crossfire of these things. I know the repukes show little regard for your children, but at the very least, we can show some for an innocent infant in this case. Just my two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I never did anything that could harm her child in any way.
Did I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. No, but you did say family...
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 11:14 AM by cynatnite
and I wasn't implying you meant physical harm. I know better. I just get very uncomfortable when kids are dragged into these political fights. :hi:

on edit: I want to apologize since I wasn't clear in my first post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I believe Mary Cheney feels she can do this, and her child WILL be shielded
That's the point. Mary's family isn't going to be affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. ",,,to call her hypocrisy, I'd still fight for her equal civil rights."
These hypocrites have every human and legal civil right imaginable already. It's called wealth. Their civil rights are bought and paid for.

The civil rights that the rest of us have to fight and beg for is a game for them. They use them as bargaining chips with the religiously insane to gain more political & financial power.

You're a good person to recognize that Mary Cheney indeed has equal civil rights.

Mary Cheney should take her family to the newest successful democracy (as her dad would have us believe)... Iraq.

Let's see if her civil rights can be bought & paid for there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. Nice observation about being shielded from the conflict.
In the war on gays, she's like a chickenhawk. Or worse. What's a word for somebody who takes sides against her *own* demographic, secure in the knowledge that she will be personally shielded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. .
Maybe something close to a collaborator. But that's probably too strong because I'm unsure whether that would be a fair description of her actions.

Even if she wasn't actively fighting against those who are like her, I guess she didn't really use her position to speak out for them or to be a part of a civil discussion. As the daughter of the VP of a party so vehemently against gays, she could have been a voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwdeviant Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
45. Young republican
"What's a word for somebody who takes sides against her *own* demographic, secure in the knowledge that she will be personally shielded?"

The classic young republican advocates war while knowing that they're safe in college pursuing "other interests".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. Very well said. Hypocrisy is the Republican creed. Remember
when Bush Sr was asked what would he do if a member of his family said they wanted an abortion? He said "I would try to talk them out of it, but in the end it would be their decision". I really do hate these people. They know they have the money and power to get anything they want even if it's done in secrecy, which I'm sure has happened, what with the Bush twins' activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. heh, we need a gay dads forum
:hi:

Yeah, Mary Cheney your fifteen minutes ended over six years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. Thank you Mondo Joe.
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 12:56 PM by Scout1071
Mary Cheney is almost lower than her dad. The level of hypocrisy is unlike any other I have ever seen in my life. In the same ballpark as Mark Foley being the head of missing and exploited children, while it was a "known secret" that he pursued teenage page boys!

I've said it before and I'll say it a hundred times again. Most Republicans are pure fakes. Phony values, phony compassion, phony fiscal conservatism (really just shifting money from the middle class to the wealthy), phony security, phony reasons for going to war. Pure fakes through and through.

I've long thought that every family had at least one gay member. Some accept it. Some sort of accept it by tolerating it, but won't readily admit it. Some are in denial......and some are just cruel. I mean, really......do they really think that with all of the poverty, war and disease in this world that Jesus would be running around worried about 2 people loving each other?

Bottom line....I suppose I wish them well since they are bringing their devil spawn into this world and I can only hope that something positive comes from it. Maybe Mary and her partner will spend the rest of their lives publicly seeking redemption and working to fight discrimination.

Either way.....ooooooooohhh....who would want to mate with Mary Cheney anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. K&R!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. Let's suppose it went something like this...
"Hello, yes, it's me, I've got something for you. Really historic. But it's got to be from anonymous sources. Got that?"
...
"No, not the Iraq Study Group. The President has already said, the report's conclusions will be considered along with other options."
...
"Iraq, grave and deteriorating? No, listen, this is really big. Nothing to do with Iraq."
...
"A risk of spreading into a regional war? Oh, Christ, does the report really say that? No, wait I don't want to know. This is big, I'm telling you. You can probably give it 5, even 10 minutes on the evening news."
...
"Yes, it's that big! Do you think I would have called if it wasn't just humongous?"
...
"Alright. You ready for this?"
...
"No, look. I'm telling you I don't want to hear about Iraq. Do you want this story or don't you?"
...
"Listen, I don't care what Jim Baker says. If you don't take this, I'm calling..."
...
"Alright then. Ready? Mary and Heather HAVE A BISCUIT IN THE OVEN!"
...
"No shit, it's big! So how much airtime can give this? We think 10 to 15 minutes is about right. I mean this IS historic, isn't it?"
...
"Sounds good. About the pink or blue, I don't know. I'll call you back... say, in January, about the time Congress reconvenes."
Click.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. So you think Mary Cheney timed her pregnancy to coincide with the
release from the ISG?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #34
49. Of course not, Joe
I'm merely suggesting that the "leak" of this information may have been timed to coincide with the release of the ISG.

The Washington Post story on the pregnancy states that when Mary was interviewed on an eventual pregnancy six months ago, she demurred and seemed to indicate that raising a child was something she and Heather had not yet discussed. But the baby is due this spring, meaning the couple was probably already working on getting pregnant when Mary spoke to the Post.

Molly Ivins calls this the "Stagecraft Administration." I was only suggesting that this "leak" may have been yet another bit of stagecraft, specifically an attempt to turn public attention from the now fully acknowledged Iraq disaster.

By the way, congrats on your daughters. Lucky you! Lucky them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Bushco has so many scandals - actual and potential - that I think ANY
time they make any announcement it looks like a diversion.

Not there aren't real diversions. But statistically, they're always having to cover SOMETHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
33. You said it!
Mary and her partner are back stabbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. The gay movement needs solidarity.
In the labor movement, people who don't commit to solidarity are known as "scabs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. Mary joined daddy and mommy going apeshit when it was mentioned she exists
Great post, mondojoe. And let me join you in a "fuck you Mary Cheney, and your asshole parents as well."

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. Of course she did
It was politically expedient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smomfr Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
40. Many children of despotic tyrants are held guilty by association.
Mary Cheney does it all by herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. First thing the Dems should do in January
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 06:58 PM by jgraz
Is introduce a resolution condemning Mary Cheney's pregnancy because she's gay, and then force all the Rethugs to vote on it. It will obviously be voted down (all the Dems will vote NO), but the Rethugs will be forced to put their votes where their mouths are on gay parenting.

There are many issues like this where the Dems could force the Rethugs to show their hypocrisy. Bills to ban evolution, deny global warming, etc. None of these would take too much time, since they don't actually have to be that carefully thought out as actual law. But the Rethugs will be faced with scaring off the moderate vote or pissing off the religious freaks.

After all, isn't that what the 'Pukes tried to do to the Dems with their cynical Iraq pullout vote?

Edit: typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
42. Mary Cheney is a horrible person, end of story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
43. Mary Cheney expects "preferential treatment"
which happens to be the very thing she and her family have been bellyaching against for years. She's boring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. What a fabulous post Joe
Glad to recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhiannon12866 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
46. K&R, my friend. Well said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
50. ...And the horse she rode in on...
Loathesome family, the Cheneys and their spawn Mary. Don't know how Heather could have non-married into it, much less helped bring a child into the picture.

It's the hypocrisy, all right.

As for me, other peoples' love and their desire to form stable families of their own has never "threatened" my marriage. I hope eventually the legislatures of this backward nation will finally recognize the right of gays and lesbians to marry.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC