Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't trust these guys: "Employers offer electronic medical data"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Target_For_Exterm Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:04 PM
Original message
I don't trust these guys: "Employers offer electronic medical data"
"WASHINGTON - Five of the nation's largest employers plan to soon give their workers a unique health care benefit — their very own electronic medical record that they can take when they travel, change jobs or see a new doctor.

About 2.5 million workers and their dependents would have access to their health records through their computer. The records will be compiled by an independent, nonprofit organization. The information will be stored in a database that only the employee is supposed to be able to access.

The companies providing the electronic health records are Applied Materials, BP America, Inc., Intel Corp., Pitney Bowes and Wal-Mart.

The companies hope that cutting out the paperwork in health care would reduce administrative costs, duplicative care and medical errors."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061206/ap_on_he_me/health_personal_records

First of all, I don't see how having electronic medical records can reduce medical costs. Unless they intend to use the system as a means to prevent employees from getting medical care, which is pretty much what happens to Medicaid recipients here in my state through the use of electronic records.

Secondly, I think companies WOULD get their hands on these records and use them as a means to discriminate in hiring and firing.

What can these people envision about how these records could be used that would justify the expense of creating the databases, which would be considerable? Whatever they envision, it would have to offset the costs (and add some savings) to creating the database itself. To me, that screams nefarious hidden agenda. Paperwork, duplicative care and medical errors don't cost companies that much money. Something stinks.

What are your thoughts on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. and when they change jobs, they can be denied health coverage
much more easily for pre-existing conditions or other "underwriting" concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I love those good ol paper charts with bad handwriting
thats hard for someone else to read. Seriously. That tells me the doctor is keeping notes but it isn't going anywhere else, or if it does, its unlikely they'll be able to read it. Show me a doctor who is typing instead of talking and I am going to volunteer as little information as I have to in order to get what I need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobofSWVA Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. the one problem I see
would be using this as a big brother file.

If the use is completely benign, then it is a brilliant idea. Let me give an example related to my field. When I write new life insurance policies, the #1 holdup is related to obtaining medical records. The cost and time spent retrieving said records is not acceptable. The min. is 2weeks even for a person in perfect health. Some of our senior agents have gone as long as 4-6 weeks trying to receive records.

If there is a way to eliminate this problem without it being abused than lets go for it. The abusive potential can not be under stressed. IT MUST NOT BE USED BY THE WRONG PEOPLE.

As far as health coverage for switching jobs, know your HIPAA rights. HIPAA guarantees the continuation of health benefits to individuals who have been covered for 12 months immediately preceding a change of employment and who chooose to participate in the new employer's group health plan. It also applies to people who become self-employed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC