Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember this: Baker is responsible for Bush being in WhiteHouse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:11 PM
Original message
Remember this: Baker is responsible for Bush being in WhiteHouse
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 04:12 PM by NormaR
Baker knew what an Idiot Son Bush is - stupid, lazy, mean...and still Baker caused a Constitutional Crisis to get that little bastard into the Oval Office.

Baker - APOLOGIZE TO AMERICA NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
danalytical Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. How
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesEtoiles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the 2000 election, Baker's law firm in Flordia courts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Seppuku?
A good start...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Randi is reminding us
at this very moment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Baker ran the recount campaign for Bush in 2000
All those tricks they pulled, courtesy of Baker and company.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
danalytical Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yikes
Is he a member of the Carlyle group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Don't think so, His law firm does
well.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Baker's greater master is the Bush1 - House of Saud alliance. House of Saud
Edited on Wed Dec-06-06 04:21 PM by blm
undoubtedly told Bush1 a few weeks ago that Bushboy has to be given the political heaveho before the entire region breaks out into civil war.

For the short term good they will be working on a withdrawal plan for Iraq but will try and save some face for Bushboy - but always with the greater goal to please the Saudis.

So, I expect a 12-18 monh withdrawal, while keeping a force deployed near enough so if the turmoil turns on House of Saud, our force will be close enough to jump in.

It's the only way they can get their longterm fascist agenda back on track after Bushboy's incompetence was beginning to expose it - and they NEED the secrecy to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think the plan for the neo-cons to get into the WH has been in
the working for many, many years..and it took all of them to preform, taking over of this country...(the supreme court, baker, media etc. and epically right wing talk radio..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes very true But this is now a war btween Poppy's group & Chenny's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-06-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe he'll break down in tears in public as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. Also keep in mind
That not one of the ISG members was against the invasion of Iraq. None of them. Every last one of them supported this fool's errand; and every witness they interviewed was in favor of invading Iraq. What sort of recommendations do you suppose you're going to get from a group that was so uniformly wrong from the get-go?

This whole thing is a whitewash job, designed to excuse every mistake, de-fang every critic, and protect the powerful architects. Lee Hamilton's presence alone is all the proof needed, but every other bit of circumstantial evidence shows that the ISG is there to provide cover, not answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. Absolutely! He has blood on his hands. He is a liar and a cheat.
I don't trust one word that comes out of his mouth.

This Iraq Panel was a farce and a sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. Baker was the fixer for the Bush family
O'Connor was one of the fixees. The real responsibility lies with the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-07-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
16. Yep. I don't trust that Bush bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC