On one day the military reported 93 significant acts of violence. There were actually 1,100 that day

[NNN0LHI]

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003493869

Iraq Study Group Settles Debate Over 'Negative' War Coverage

NEW YORK For years now, the debate has raged: Does the press overstate the level of violence in Iraq and ignore the overall positive aspect of the U.S. involvment? The Iraq Study Group report today, in its main claim that the situation in Iraq is now "grave" and "deteriorating" would seem to offer a clue to the answer, but more specific details -- providing a "slam dunk" (if we may use that phrase) on the side of the press -- are found in the Intelligence section of the report near its end, starting on page 93.

There we learn, bluntly, that "there is significant underreporting of the violence in Iraq" by the U.S. military. "The standard for recording attacks acts as a filter to keep events out of reports and databases," the report continues.

Looking at one day, the report found undercounting of violent attacks by more than 1000 percent.

"A murder of an Iraqi is not necessarily counted as an attack," the report explained." If we cannot deter mine the source of a sectarian attack, that assault does not make it into the database. A roadside bomb or a rocket or mortar attack that doesn’t hurt U.S. personnel doesn’t count. For example, on one day in July 2006 there were 93 attacks or significant acts of violence reported. Yet a careful review of the reports for that single day brought to light 1,100 acts of violence.

[marmar]

1. It's like living in the old Soviet Union....

Filthy liars. Every last one of them in this administration.

[BuyingThyme]

2. But, Bill O'Reilly said...

[Mendocino]

3. So an attack on an American is equal to an attack on ten Iraqis?

a life is a life, are we so jaded that we resort to Vietnam standards: "The body count today was 100 dead Vietcong to only 10 dead US troops." What are we there for; kill ratios?!!!