Okay, in the
Press Conference Georgie did answer a question about being ind denial about how bad things are in IRAQ... with the flip statement (okay, so) "It's bad in Iraq. Does that help?". Of course, he then went on and on about how he's "been saying it a lot"... but, what he actually says then is all about how "tough" it is in IRAQ. Sure, "bad" and "tough" are similar... but one expects combat duty to be "tough"; when it and the whole situation gets to be "bad", well, something needs to change.
Anyway, he then fails to address the other half of the question--which was about his perceived lack of "sincerity about changing course". Of course. That's because he really does plan to change course, that is, change course TO the
new, novel plan of "staying the course".
Sir, it's bad! Yes, that's what I said: "It's tough". (tough isn't the same)
Sir, we need to change course! Yes, that's what I said: "I understand what we're doing... (list what we've been doing)". (nobody asked if he "understood" what he thinks we have been accomplishing/doing)
Do his answers make sense (or address what was asked)? In Bushworld maybe; elsewhere not even close.
Q. Mr. President, the Iraq Study Group described the situation in Iraq as grave and deteriorating. You said that the increase in attacks is unsettling. That won't convince many people that you're (not**) still in denial about how bad things are in Iraq, and question your sincerity about changing course.
PRESIDENT BUSH: It's bad in Iraq. Does that help? (Laughter.)
Q. Why did it take others to say it before you've been willing to acknowledge for the world --
PRESIDENT BUSH: In all due respect, I've been saying it a lot. I understand how tough it is. And I've been telling the American people how tough it is. And they know how tough it is. And the fundamental question is, do we have a plan to achieve our objective. Are we willing to change as the enemy has changed? And what the Baker-Hamilton study has done is it shows good ideas as to how to go forward. What our Pentagon is doing is figuring out ways to go forward, all aiming to achieve our objective.
Make no mistake about it, I understand how tough it is, sir. I talk to families who die. I understand there's sectarian violence. I also understand that we're hunting down al Qaeda on a regular basis and we're bringing them to justice. I understand how hard our troops are working. I know how brave the men and women who wear the uniform are, and therefore, they'll have the full support of this government. I understand what long deployments mean to wives and husbands, and mothers and fathers, particularly as we come into a holiday season. I understand. And I have made it abundantly clear how tough it is.
...
So, no, I appreciate your question. As you can tell, I feel strongly about making sure you understand that I understand it's tough... (last paragraph of answer to question)
** "not" seems to be missing in the transcript (and possibly therefore, from the speech) but assumed to have been intended.