Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson: 'I Am Running' in 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:39 PM
Original message
New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson: 'I Am Running' in 2008
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,235323,00.html

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is expected to formally file papers to form a presidential exploratory committee in January.

But on Thursday he told FOX News "I am running," as he described the professional and personal experiences that he believes have prepared him for the job.

"I've dealt with the issues that are very important today — national security, immigration and energy," Richardson said in an interview with FOX News' Carl Cameron.

Richardson was secretary of energy and later U.N. ambassador during the Clinton administration. In addition to his diplomatic experience, Richardson believes that his Hispanic heritage will be an advantage in his campaign for the presidency.

"I am Hispanic, which I believe is an asset," Richardson said. "But I'm not running as an Hispanic, I am running as an American who is proud to be Hispanic."

Richardson plans to travel to New Hampshire, the first of the nation's states to hold a primary, the weekend after next.

In the most recent FOX News/Opinion Dynamics poll asking whom voters would select if the primary were held today, Richardson tied for last out of pool of 10 potential Democratic candidates with just 1 percent saying they would pick him. Sens. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., topped the list with 33 and 12 percents, respectively.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Richardson opposed immediate pullout from Iraq and said...
...that the economic sanctions, which killed over a million Iraqis years after Iraq had dismantled its weapons programs, were justified. He supports "an exit strategy" but with no timetable for withdrawal.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/22/1847207
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. So then, this whole thread has gone Emily Littella on us?
"Mr. Richardson is NOT running for resident? Oh, that's very, very different. Never mind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. bill richardson for drug czar in the Gore administration
that's my pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fox News makes up shit about Richardson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Richardson would be an interesting possibility as Veep
if the nomination went to a more liberal candidate. He'd put most of the Mountain West into play in that capacity, which would leave the GOP badly on the defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think that's his long-term strategy, actually.
He'd be quite a good choice for Veeper.

thoughtfully,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Bad choice all the way around, if you bother to look into what he's about!
Seriously, do some "vetting" before deciding that he's so great, just because he's from the west.

If it's the west you want, Gary Hart would be a much better choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. I Don't Know What Kind of Campaigner Richardson Is
Edited on Fri Dec-08-06 05:58 PM by ribofunk
but he certainly has good qualifications. I would prefer a governor. Unfortunately, he might be the Bob Graham of 2008 -- everybody's favorite #2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. A drunken one.
With lousy qualifications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Would that be why the "western movie" campaign ad Richardson did this year
Had him strolling into a saloon and ordering milk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Didn't see it. He has enough DUIs, well, enough.
And that's just the start.

Really, I don't understand why people don't do more "vetting" before throwing their support behind somebody just because...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. This thread could be considered to be part of the vetting process.
I didn't know about the DUIs.

There was also Richardson's pro-NAFTA work in Congress which could be an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh crap!!! This is bad on so many levels! Drop it, Richardson!
Just what we Dems need... another bad choice.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC