Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA May Drop Lead Air Pollution Limits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 08:41 PM
Original message
EPA May Drop Lead Air Pollution Limits
Published on Thursday, December 7, 2006 by the Associated Press
EPA May Drop Lead Air Pollution Limits
by John Heilprin
 
The Bush administration is considering doing away with health standards that cut lead from gasoline, widely regarded as one of the nation's biggest clean-air accomplishments. Battery makers, lead smelters, refiners all have lobbied the administration to do away with the Clean Air Act limits.

A preliminary staff review released by the Environmental Protection Agency this week acknowledged the possibility of dropping the health standards for lead air pollution. The agency says revoking those standards might be justified "given the significantly changed circumstances since lead was listed in 1976" as an air pollutant.

The EPA says concentrations of lead in the air have dropped more than 90 percent in the past 2 1/2 decades.

But Rep. Henry Waxman (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., the incoming chairman of the House Committee on Government Reform, called on the agency to "renounce this dangerous proposal immediately," because lead, a highly toxic element, can cause severe nerve damage, especially in children.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1207-01.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. This last line caught my attention
"That is not to say that air emissions of lead should be uncontrolled, or that no steps should be taken to address public health concerns arising from lead use," the Battery Council International said. "But many other regulatory vehicles exist for meeting these concerns."

I wonder if the guy is blowing smoke or is on to a real problem? I work in the chemical industry and the number of environmental rules and regulations are mind boggling at times. There are many regulations the overlap each other (often contradicting each other in the process) that create redundant and wasteful programs for companies to comply with.

Sometimes even a broken clock is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. But the regs seem to be working.
The EPA says concentrations of lead in the air have dropped more than 90 percent in the past 2 1/2 decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm all for reg's on lead
I was merely pointing out that sometimes these regulations overlap each other in weird ways that make compliance a nightmare. This might be a case where that happens.

It's sort of works like this. One part of a state or federal agency has a set of rules for a process or chemical, and another state or fed agency has another set of rules that for the same process or chemical. A manufacturer must comply with both. Sometimes one reg has a manufacturer doing something the other reg does not allow or is a burden to implement for no reason. Neither side want to change so the manufacturer gets stuck in the middle. You can get rid of one set of regs and still operate in an environmentally safe way.

Is this the case here? I'm guessing not, but you never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. self-delete
Edited on Fri Dec-08-06 09:11 PM by BadgerKid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is just SO fucking disgraceful. I read it in the paper today, and could not believe
what I was seeing.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somebody tell me they're not NAZIs.
If you would, please put "Mengele" in the GOOGLE and see there's NO difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC