Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Falwell: NBC Sermonizes Against Chastity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 08:58 AM
Original message
Falwell: NBC Sermonizes Against Chastity
FALWELL CONFIDENTIAL
Insider weekly newsletter to The Moral Majority Coalition and
The Liberty Alliance

From: Jerry Falwell
Date: December 8, 2006

NBC Sermonizes Against Chastity

Last night (Thursday) on NBC’s “ER,” the character of Hope Bobeck, who is defined as a Christian, abruptly decides that she should enter a sexual relationship with an atheist character.

“Chastity has always been overrated,” she states as she tells Dr. Archie Morris that they should meet for dinner and drinks and then “see what happens.” The doctor did determine not to join her for this tryst, but who knows what will happen in future episodes. The point here is that the portrayal is of a Christian young lady who suddenly determines that the Bible’s plan for sexuality is wrong.

Earlier this year, when NBC announced that “ER” would incorporate a Christian character into the series, many Christians held out hope that maybe just once we would see an honest depiction of someone who chooses to walk with Christ.

Instead, we get an often bungling character whose Christian faith is easily challenged and defeated.
This is typical of the so-called mainstream media.

The storyline reminds me of a “Will and Grace” episode a few years ago in which a gathering of ex-gays (people who have walked away from homosexuality) suddenly run off with each other, overcome by their sexual urges.

The message here is clear: Christianity is a feeble crutch that cannot — and should not — stand against reckless sexuality.

Christians who turn from homosexuality are depicted as jokes, even though multiple thousands of these individuals are wonderfully living out their faith today. And Christian singles who determine that they will remain chaste until marriage are similarly mocked.

I continue to insist that Christians are the only group in America that is routinely demeaned in the media. Strikingly, the major networks do not see a double standard.

Earlier this year on “ER,” a homosexual female impersonator was in the series hospital caring for his “partner.” So moved by their love was one of the attending doctors, he states, “You make me wish I was a drag queen.”

Imagine one of the “ER” doctors making that statement to a Christian character.
Exactly. There’s no way.

So passionate is the sentiment on these shows, they might as well hang a sign for viewers to see on their TV screens: “Gay is good. Christianity is bad.”

I believe these negative media portrayals of Christians and Christianity goes hand-in-hand with the accelerating effort to purge our nation of its Judeo-Christian symbols.

It’s a one-two punch: the media depicts Christians as either mean-spirited ogres or easily influenced simpletons while civil libertarians attempt to convince our fellow citizens that America should be free of religious symbols, specifically Christian ones.

This is why I believe our current battle to protect Christmas in the public square is so important. If representations of Christmas are outlawed, even informally, it is another nail in the coffin of public religious expression.

Working closely with Liberty Counsel, which this year launched its fourth annual “Friend or Foe Campaign,” we have convinced many retailers to return to utilizing expressions of Christmas in their advertising, store displays and employee conversations. Readers can visit the Liberty Counsel website to see this year’s “Naughty and Nice” list, which shows which retailers have Christmas-friendly (and unfriendly) policies.

We have also worked with pastors and churches across the country in placing local newspaper ads that inform readers on the legalities of public Christmas expressions.

I believe this is an important campaign. It is just one of the ways we must work together to preserve our nation’s Judeo-Christian heritage against those whose deceptive campaign seeks to ignore and defy our history. It is fully apparent that Christianity is in the crosshairs, so we must work harder than ever to preserve our religious freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hahahaha!
What a loon!

He needs to go find his tinfoil hat! }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Jer! What's worse: her choice to chuck chastity or is it the fact
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 09:04 AM by no_hypocrisy
that she may "do it" with an godless atheist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. "The message here is clear: Christianity is a feeble crutch"
Well, OK, have it your way, Jer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Sometimes, even the Talibangelicals get it right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Talk about a persecution complex!
How fragile does he think Christians are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh yes, that was unfair of ER, because we all know that Christians
NEVER engage in sex outside of marriage. We wouldn't want to portray something so blatantly FALSE about Christians, implying that they are HUMAN just like everyone else, and not without sin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. We wouldn't want to see them
as hypocritical warmongering jihadists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Umm, NBC is portraying Christianity in a reality based way
All that one has to do is check the rate of STDs, unwanted pregnancies, etc., among those Christians brought up on abstinence only programs. The stats aren't good. And frankly, judging from a lot of anecdotal evidence, Falwell is way off the mark here.

Sorry Jerry, but the truth hurts sometimes, but hey, you've probably figured that out by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. And in Falwell's opinion, REALITY is a bad thing.
Just look at the lengths he goes to to avoid it;
to avoid talking about it, to avoid even ADMITTING
that it exists.

"How dare a TV network go looking to REALITY for its
characters and plotlines", saith Falwell.

NO, that won't do. Everyone everywhere must live their lives
according to the shifting, contradictory rules of Jerry Falwell's
own personal fantasy-land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. he's not preaching to the reality-based crowd, though
And, you're right, I think born again Christians and Christian fundamenatlists have the highest divorce rates (with Atheists having a rate near the bottom!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Good point! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. "They might as well hang a sign “Gay is good. Christianity is bad."
Can we order those signs at your website, Jer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Make some up
They should read:

"Gay is Good. Christianity is Bad."
--Jerry Falwell


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoil tiaras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. "People who have walked away from homosexuality"
That's impossible. Homosexuality is genetically encoded into a person. In other words, the homosexual gene is in your DNA (and the APA agrees with me) and you can't change it. Being an "ex gay" is like someone being an "ex-black" (Michael Jackson is an exception) or an "ex-white" or an "ex-hispanic". You can't change your skin color and you can't change your sexuality. When was the last time someone said they chose to be straight. Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Earth-to-Jerry, Christians didn't always have a bad image
You and your crowd gave it to them. The sign should read "Gay is good; Falwell's brand of Christianity is very, very bad."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Love this line of his:
"If representations of Christmas are outlawed, even informally, it is another nail in the coffin of public religious expression."

I wonder if in the first draft, he had that line as:

"If representations of Christmas are outlawed, only outlaws will have Christmas."


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Often the idiotic and hypocritical are "demeaned," Rev. Fallwell--that
so many idiotic hypocrites happen to be fundy loons is just the way it shakes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. So, having sex negates your faith?
Where in the Bible does it say that?

I do know the Bible says, "Judge not, lest ye be judged".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. Is the character "Dr. Archie Morris" really an atheist?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's funny how Jerry continuously fails to see why MLKJr is more revered than him.
Every time he attempts to equate the disdain people have for hypocrites and hate-mongers to "disdain for Christians" I think of Martin Luther King Jr.'s conscientious modeling of his own faith - and the vicious bigots like Falwell who attacked him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. People still watch ER?
Doesn't he have bigger issues to preach on? Oh, that's right . . . he doesn't. :eyes: He sounds like all those idiot preachers who'd rail on and on about sex outside of marriage during chapel in college. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. "multiple thousands of these individuals "
Hey Falwell!!!

Could we have a link on that, guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. Get a clue, Jerry.
Not all Christians are chaste, and not all atheists are promiscuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
22. Excuse my cynicism....
...but Christianity is a feeble crutch. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. Jeez, I hope he doesn't begin watching
Boston Legal! (THE best show on network TV....God bless David E. Kelly)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. Mr. Falwell, Blow it out of your hemrhoidal ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. But that character is an unlikable, sleazy ASSHOLE and hardly a role-model.
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 12:24 PM by IanDB1
His awkward and fumbling speech against chastity was SUPPOSED to be seen as what it actually was-- a lame attempt to get into the pants of his born-again co-worker.

DUH!



Fundamentalists have a genetic inability to recognize or appreciate irony, satire, or subtlety. It's their defense mechanism against the cognitive dissonance cause by their own hypocrisy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Go suck Fred Phelps, Jerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC